Thursday, August 21, 2008

Houses in subprime shape lead price charge down - Aug. 22, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Mold, maggots and piles of festering trash - no wonder home prices are in freefall.


It's not just the subprime mortgage crisis that's to blame for plummeting home prices. A flood of squalid properties on the market is helping to exaggerate the post-bubble price declines.


"Part of the reason home prices are declining is a fundamental deterioration in the housing stock," said Glenn Kelman, CEO of the online, discount broker Redfin. "During the boom, nine out of 10 houses for sale in many markets were in prime condition. Now, for every 10 houses, at least three are dogs."


Most of these mutts are foreclosed properties that have been permitted to fall into disrepair by lenders overwhelmed with thousands of vacant homes. If these houses sell at all, they're going for bargain basement prices that are hurting home values throughout the neighborhood.


"I've never seen so many houses in this condition before," said Ray Anderson of Buyer's Advantage Real Estate in Auburn Calif., near Sacramento. "And I've been in the business 20 years. I've seen bank-owned properties in the past. They were never like this."


Distressed properties usually sell for discounts of 10% to 40% below comparable, well-maintained homes, according to Tom Inserra, executive vice president for Zaio, an appraisal company that is creating a national database of home values.


Richard Smith, CEO of Realogy, the parent company for Coldwell Banker, Century 21 and Sotheby's International Realty, estimates that homes that are not bank-owned have actually only seen price declines in the low single digits over the past 12 months. That's compared with the 15% price drop recorded by the S&P/Case-Shiller Index for all homes over the same period.


'Crime scene'

Lori Mize has firsthand experience with horrible homes for sale. She waited for years for prices to come down in her Elk Grove, Calif. home area, just east of Sacramento. With the median home there now selling 30% below the market's peak, Mize thought it was time to buy. But nearly all the homes in her price range - $250,000 to $300,000 - are bank-owned properties, which tend to be in the most beat-up condition.


After looking at a few of them, she was almost ready to give up.


"The first one I saw was the worst home I had ever seen in my life," said the married mother of two young girls. "There were magic-marker messages on the front door saying, 'STAY OUT.' They had poured paint and other stuff on the carpets. There was a lot of trash. I felt like I was at the scene of a crime. I wouldn't let my daughters touch anything."


In Florida, another foreclosure hot spot, vacant homes deteriorate rapidly in the high heat and humidity.


Garbage and food that's left behind fester. "The properties smell," said Eve Alexander, an agent in Orlando. "You find maggots. The swimming pools are green. The lawns dry up. They're eyesores. Neighbors yell at us to water the lawn."


Often the homes have been stripped bare. "All the kitchen appliances, cabinets and countertops, bathroom fixtures, lights are [stolen]," she said.


Others trash the place before they leave, according to Adele Hrovat, a real estate agent with the Buyer's Realty of Las Vegas. "They punch holes in the walls, dump oil on the carpets. The banks are so overwhelmed, they haven't gotten to the point when they send in crews to fix them up," she said.


Indeed, soaring foreclosures have returned many houses to their lenders, who put them right back on the market - usually as is.


Nationally 18.6% of all homes sold during the three months ended June 30 were foreclosures, compared with just 7% during the same period a year earlier, and 3.1% in 2006, according to the real estate Web site Zillow.com. And that doesn't include short sales, which is when a home is sold for less than the mortgage balance and the bank forgives the unpaid balance and also account for a lot of sales in many areas.


Just a few years ago in Detroit, only one in a hundred listings were foreclosures or short sales, according to agent David Mills of Homebuyer's Realty. Now half of the listings are. Some have been badly damaged and suffered huge drops in value.


"A three-year old home that recently sold for $660,000 is listed for $350,000. There's no kitchen, no master bath. The toilet was taken, the tub, cabinets gone."


A growing problem

With the number of foreclosed properties projected to keep rising, there seems to be no end in sight to falling prices, according to Texas A&M real estate economist Mark Dotzour. Even though many of these dilapidated homes are actually pretty good bargains, Dotzour isn't surprised that more people aren't jumping in. Everyone is reluctant to buy in a declining market.


"Once buyers start to feel confident that prices in a given community have stabilized, they'll start buying again," he said.


For that to happen, the natural population increase will have to absorb all the excess housing inventory, until supply and demand are in balance again.


In the meantime, Congress has allocated $4 billion for municipalities to rehab derelict foreclosures in an effort to prevent them from dragging down nearby neighborhoods.


But mostly hitting bottom is just waiting for market events to play out and the construction of new homes drops and remains below below the replacement rate for a while.


"Once that inventory is gone, we'll be at the market bottom, and the price trajectory will flatten out," said Dotzour.


Until then, dilapidated homes will continue to aggravate the steep price drops being recorded throughout the nation. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Wednesday, August 20, 2008

Mortgage rate fall to 6.47% - Aug. 21, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Rates on the 30-year fixed mortgage fell from last week, even as the housing market showed more signs of weakness.


Government-sponsored mortgage finance giant Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) reported Thursday that 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.47% this week. That's just below the previous week, but still under the 6.52% average a year ago.


"Even with the current historically affordable mortgage rates, news continues to show signs of weakening in the housing sector," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist.


More bad news

He noted that housing starts fell in July to their slowest pace in 17 years, and homebuilder confidence remains at record-low levels.


Other mortgage rates also slipped this week, according to the Freddie Mac survey.


Rates on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages fell to 6.0%, down from 6.07% last week. Last year, the 15-year mortgage averaged 6.18%


The five-year adjustable-rate mortgage declined to 5.99%, down from 6.02% last week. At this point last year, it averaged 6.34%.


The rate on one-year adjustable-rate mortgages increased to 5.29%, compared to 5.18% last week. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 5.60%.


Reports on new and existing home sales for July are due next week. Also on tap is the S&P Case-Shiller home price index for June.


Meanwhile, mortgage application volume fell last week to its lowest level in nearly eight years, the Mortgage Bankers Association reported Wednesday. The sharp drop in refinancing volume in recent weeks has been the leading driver of the declining application volume.  


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


More Fannie, Fannie worries send share on roller coaster - Aug. 21, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Shares of mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac plunged and then rebounded in early trading on Thursday after new reports that the federal government may have to take over the troubled firms.


Fannie fell as much as 87 cents or 20%, to $3.53, but then rebounded to a small gain in morning trade. Freddie shares tumbled as much as 99 cents, or 30%, to a record low before rebounding. The lows of the day represented a 20-year low for Fannie (FNM, Fortune 500) when adjusted for splits, and a record low on that basis for Freddie (FRE, Fortune 500), which started trading in 1989.


The Wall Street Journal Thursday said that the firms needed to refinance $225 billion in mostly short-term debt by the end on September. Concerns about the firms' ability to refinance the debt had prompted Treasury Department officials to begin developing a series of options to shore up the companies, if necessary.


The two shareholder-owned firms were originally set up by the federal government to provide financing to the mortgage market. Today they are the primary source of funding for banks and other home lenders, and they own or guarantee more than $5 trillion in mortgages. But both have reported large losses due to rising foreclosures and declining home prices on the loans they own or back.


Earlier this summer, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson secured congressional authority to lend the firms an unlimited amount of money if necessary, as well as the ability to have the government buy shares in the two firms. It is widely expected that such a move would wipe out the holdings of current shareholders.


Paulson and executives of the firms have continued to insist that they don't expect such moves to be necessary, as they have stated that both firms have capital in excess of levels required by regulators to cover their expected future losses. But the investors have not been convinced, sending shares down more than 60% in the first three trading days of this week alone. Shares have now lost nearly 90% year-to-date. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Tuesday, August 19, 2008

Distressed IndyMac borrowers to get relief - Aug. 20, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The FDIC, six weeks after taking over mortgage lender IndyMac Bank, said Wednesday that it will start automatically modifying some of the bank's most troubled loans to keep borrowers in their homes.


The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. said it has started to send out the first of what will be an estimated 25,000 letters to borrowers most seriously delinquent on their loans.


The goal of the modifications: to provide borrowers with affordable payments so they can stay in their homes while minimizing the risk of foreclosure and loss to investors in securities backed by the loans.


"Foreclosure is often a lengthy, costly and destructive process. Avoiding foreclosure not only strengthens local neighborhoods where foreclosures are already driving down property values, it makes good business sense," FDIC Chairman Sheila Bair said in a statement. "This is a 'win-win' program all around."


Equally important, by turning what are currently non-perfoming loans into performing loans, the FDIC hopes to maximize the value of IndyMac assets to potential buyers, which would be good news for IndyMac customers who had uninsured deposits at the bank when it was taken over. A higher purchase price would also mean fewer costs for the FDIC and its insurance fund.


"By turning troubled loans into performing ones, we enhance their overall value," Bair said in a press call Wednesday afternoon.


Bair, who has long pressed lenders to help struggling homeowners by systematically modifying their mortgages to more affordable terms, inherited $200 billion in mortgages owned or serviced by IndyMac when the bank was taken over by regulators in July.


She said she hopes this new FDIC program will serve as a model for other loan servicers.


"It's my hope that it will provide further catalyst to provide more loan modifications for borrowers across the country," Bair said.


How the program will work

The FDIC is defining "affordable" loans as those in which the mortgage payment (including principal, interest, taxes and insurance) does not exceed 38% of a borrower's income.


That debt-to-income ratio may be achieved in a number of ways, according to the FDIC: by reducing the interest owed on the loan, by stretching out the number of years over which the loan may be paid back or by principal forbearance, which defers payment on a portion of the original principal until the home is sold or the loan is refinanced.


For IndyMac borrowers to qualify for an FDIC modification, they would have to show verification of income - most IndyMac loans are so-called Alt-A loans, which were given to borrowers with good credit but no proof of income. Borrowers would also have to verify that the home at issue is their principal residence. And they would need to sign the letter sent to them by the FDIC and send it back with the first payment due on the modified loan.


The FDIC said borrowers may call (800) 781-7399 to talk with an IndyMac Federal representative to see if they qualify. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Monday, August 18, 2008

New York becomes least affordable housing market in U.S. - Aug. 19, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Home prices continue to tumble across the country, making homes more affordable in most U.S. cities, according to a new report released Tuesday.


Nationally, 55% of homes sold from April through June were affordable to families earning the U.S. median income of $61,500, according to a quarterly report released Tuesday by the National Association of Home Builders.


That's up from 53.8% in the first quarter of 2008, and the most affordable home prices have been since the second quarter of 2004.


"Several factors combined to increase housing affordability nationwide. There was a marginal rise in mortgage rates, which still remain near the historically low levels of a few years ago, family income nationwide held steady, and lower house prices," said NAHB President Sandy Dunn in a press release.


Indianapolis led the the nation's major metro areas in home affordability for the 12th straight quarter. The median price of homes sold during the second quarter was $108,000, down from $122,000 last year. And 91.6% of the households there earning the median income of $65,100 could afford to buy a median priced home. That's up from 86.8% last year.


New York was the least affordable major housing market in the country, according to the report. It was the first time that a major metropolitan area outside of California was the least affordable home market in the 17-year history of the report.


In New York, the median home price fell slightly year over year to $481,000 from $510,00. That led to an increase in affordability; 11.4% of households earning the median income of $63,000 could afford to buy a median priced home, up from 6.3% in the second quarter of 2007.


Despite that change, New York still fell to the least affordable area from second-least affordable last year, according to this survey. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Home building plunges to 17-year low in July - Aug. 19, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Housing building fell sharply in July to a 17-year low, a government report issued Tuesday showed.


Starts plunged 11% to an annual rate of 965,000 from a revised 1.084 million pace in June, according to the Census Bureau report. Economists surveyed by Briefing.com had forecast starts would fall to a rate of 960,000.


Permits - often seen as a sign of builders' confidence in the housing market - tumbled 17% to an annual rate of 937,000 from a revised 1.138 million in June. Economists had forecast that permits would come in at 959,000.


The sharp percentage drop from June was due partly to a jump in multi-family home starts and permits during that month. Single-family home starts and permits slipped only slightly from the June level. But the single-family starts were also at a 17-year low in July, while single-family permits fell to a level not seen since the 1982 recession, reaching a rate of only 584,000 homes in July.


The sharp fall in building activity suggests that home building will continue to be a drag on the economy in the second half of the year. Earlier this year, many economists hoped that building activity would bottom out this summer and start to show signs of improvement.


In the second quarter, the drop in home building took 0.6 percentage points off of gross domestic product, the broad measure of the nation's economic activity. It marked the 10th straight quarter that home building has been a drag on GDP.


But the continued drop in building could be just what the battered real estate market needs. One of the biggest problem for sellers is a glut of unsold homes on the market. Since demand for homes remains weak, the glut will only ease if fewer new homes are built.


In June, builders faced a median wait of 8.4 months to sell a completed home, the longest delay in selling time in 25 years, according to a separate Census Bureau report issued recently.


The government report on housing starts and permits comes the day after a survey of builder confidence by the National Association of Home Builders remained at a record low in August. Only 5% of builders said the current market is good, 8% said they expected a favorable market in the next six months and fewer than 2% said they were seeing strong traffic from potential buyers.


The downturn in housing and building has hammered the results of most of the nation's major builders. Late last month Centex (CTX, Fortune 500), which is the No. 2 builder by revenue, reported a larger-than-expected loss and warned it was seeing no improvement in the home building market.


Most builders have reported larger than expected losses, although Pulte Home (PHM, Fortune 500), the largest builder by revenue, did slightly better than forecasts. Only one major builder, NVR (NVR, Fortune 500), has reported a profit through the current downturn, although its earnings have plunged.


As a group, the revenue of the nation's eight largest home builders has plunged 37% over the last year. Analysts surveyed by Thomson Reuters are forecasting another 36% drop in revenue over the course of the next 12 months. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Sunday, August 17, 2008

Builders' sentiment survey matches all-time low - Aug. 18, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Homebuilders' confidence in the housing market remained at record low levels, a trade group said Monday.


The NAHB/Wells Fargo housing market index for August held at a seasonally adjusted reading of 16, matching July's reading. Economists surveyed by Thomson/IFR also expected the index to remain at 16.


A reading below 50 indicates that more builders think home sales conditions are poor than those who think the environment is positive for sales. August's reading ties the record low level reached in July, which fell below the previous record low set in June.


Builders were asked for their view of the current market, the number of buyers looking at homes and expectations for six months from now.


Only 5% of the builders surveyed believe the current market is favorable, up from 4% in July. Of the more than 300 homebuilders surveyed, 73% view the market as poor. Still the bleak numbers were an uptick from July, sending the August present sales component index up to a level of 16 from 15 in July.


The future sales index also got a slight boost in August, rising to a level of 25, up 2 points from the previous month. Just 8% of builders said housing market will be favorable by the end of the year, though that's up from 6% in the previous month. Poor conditions are expected to continue six months from now by 60% of the builders surveyed.


Builders said the number of prospective buyers is still low, and the component traffic of buyers index held steady at 12. Only 1.2% of builders said they received a high number of prospects, while 77% said the number of potential buyers was low.


Light at the end of the tunnel

Although overall builders' confidence remains at an all-time low, Seiders believes the market is due for a turnaround soon.


"Our current forecast shows stabilization of sales during the second half of this year, followed by solid recovery in 2009 and beyond," he said in a statement. "It is a good sign that two out of three of the ... component indexes rose in August, and this may be an indication that we are nearing the bottom of the long downswing in new-home sales."


Though there is some stabilization of national existing home sales already, Seiders noted much of that has been driven by an upswing on foreclosure sales at cut-rate prices.


As a result of a battered market, President Bush signed the Housing and Economic Recovery Act late last month. The bill includes a temporary home buyer tax credit of up to $7,500 for first-time home buyers or haven't purchased a home in three years.


Qualified buyers must earn less than $75,000 - or $150,000 for a couple - after which point the tax credit begins to phase out. The Senate Finance Committee estimates that about 1.6 million people will use the credit.


"Builders are counting on some support from this new first-time homebuyer tax credit," Seiders said. "Though first-time home buyers generally buy more in the existing home market than in the new home market, new homes get a ladder effect from the existing home market."


Monday's report came a day ahead of the government's report on housing starts and building permits for July, which economists forecast will fall close to 17-year lows after unexpected gains in those measures in the June report.


Shares of homebuilders were mostly lower Monday. Lennar Corp. (LEN, Fortune 500), Centex Corp. (CTX, Fortune 500) D.R. Horton Inc. (DHI, Fortune 500) and Hovnanian (HOV, Fortune 500) all lost about 1%, though Radian Group (RDN) traded in slightly positive territory. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Tax credit for first time home buyers comes with caveats - Aug. 18, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Washington policy makers and housing industry insiders hope a new tax credit for first-time home buyers will get the moribund housing market moving again.


But most analysts agree that the program is more of a band-aid than a cure-all for the battered real estate market. What's more, others are quick to point out that the credit must be repaid, which means it's actually an interest-free loan that could get some homeowners in trouble.


"It's one of those things that are more complicated than it seems at first blush, said Allen Fishbein, director of housing and credit policy for the Consumer Federation of America. "Consumers have to make sure they understand the credit thoroughly.


The $7,500 credit is for people buying their first homes, and was passed as part of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 and signed into law in July. To qualify for the full $7,500, individuals must earn less than $75,000 annually, while couples may earn up to $150,000. Buyers with income of between $95,000 and $170,000 are eligible for a partial credit.


The Senate Finance Committee estimates that about 1.6 million people will use the credit.


The housing industry pushed for the program. "Breaking the log jam of unsold homes is something we are very much behind," said Richard Dugas, president of builder Pulte Homes, at a news conference to discuss the program. First time home buyers represented about 20% of the market for new homes in 2007.


Realtors are also behind the credit. "[It] will help chip away at inventory levels, stabilize prices and spur [sales] activity," said Richard A. Smith, CEO of Realogy, the parent company of both Coldwell Banker and Century 21.


The industry has had success with tax credits in the past. In 1975, Congress passed a $2,000 credit for home buyers (about $8,200 in today's dollars).


"Buyers flocked to market and cleared out a then-record inventory of homes," said NAHB president Sandy Dunn. But that credit did not have to be repaid.


And the impact should extend beyond first time home buyers, according to Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association of Realtors. A boost in demand for starter homes means that those sellers will be able to trade up to bigger, more expensive places, and so on up the chain.


How it works

Buyers who have not owned a home in the past three years can take a tax credit worth 10% of a home's sale price, up to $7,500, whichever is smaller.


The credit is good for homes closed on after April 9, 2008 and before July 1, 2009, and can be taken on taxes filed during 2008 or 2009. Even buyers who bought a home before the bill passed, but after April 9, can claim the credit.


Unlike tax deductions, which only offset taxes by lowering taxable income, the tax credit is a straight dollar-for-dollar deduction of your tax bill. So a buyer who would ordinarily pay $8,000 in taxes would pay just $500.


It's also "refundable," which means if a buyer's taxes are less than $7,500, the government will send them a check for the difference. For example, if a couple's income generates a tax bill of $5,000, the government will refund all of that plus $2,500.


Buyers must to start paying back the loan within two years, at a rate of no more than $500 a year for 15 years. When the the home is sold, any outstanding balance will be repaid from the profit; if it's sold at a loss and the difference will be forgiven.


And some argue that mortgage lenders will take the credit into consideration, making it easier for buyers to get a loan.


"[The $7,500 reserve] will make borrowers less likely to fall into default," said Ken Goldstein, an economist with the Conference Board, since it gives them a nest egg should they run into trouble. Still, that assumes that buyers will sock the $7,500 away rather than spend it.


No cure

Indeed, the credit comes with plenty of caveats from economists and industry analysts.


"It's not going to provide first-time home buyers with cash up front," said the Consumer Federation of America's Allen Fishbein. "You have to apply to get the credit after the fact. There's a delay before you get the financial advantage."


And there are concerns that borrowers may treat the credit as a windfall, spending it as if it doesn't have to be repaid.


"It may appear to be free money," said Fishbein. "Consumers have to have their eyes open about how this works."


Other economists caution that while the credit may be helpful, it's hardly a solution to the crisis.


"It will not turn things around," said Jared Bernstein, an economist with the Economic Policy Institute. "Given the economy, it will only push a precious few first-time home buyers over the edge right now."


Plummeting home prices will blunt any impact that the credit may have, according to Nicholas Retsinas, director of the Harvard University's Joint Center for Housing Studies. As far as he's concerned, the market is simply too soft right now for a modest measure like this to make a big difference.


"The challenge right now is as much willingness to buy as affordability," he said. "The market still has this psychological barrier because people think prices will be lower tomorrow. I don't think this can overcome that barrier." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Wednesday, August 13, 2008

Home prices have fallen 7.6% over the past 12 months - Aug. 14, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Real estate prices continued to post steep year-over-year declines during the three months ended June 30, according to a new report from the National Association of Realtors (NAR).


Nationwide, the median existing single family home price plunged 7.6% to $206,500 from $223,500 in the second quarter of 2007. The median price represents the point at which half of all homes sold for more and half sold for less.


A record numbers of foreclosures helped drive down prices, according to NAR. In fact, foreclosures and short sales accounted for about one third of all existing homes sales.


"In many areas with large concentrations of foreclosure sales, homes are being purchased below replacement cost values," said NAR president, Richard Gaylord. "Many buyers with long-term expectations are getting exceptional value in the current market."


Sun Belt metro areas led with price declines. These areas ran up fabulous gains during the mid-2000s boom, but are experiencing even more severe declines during the bust.


Regional and local prices

In Sacramento, Calif. prices plunged 35.6% year-over-year to $$229,500. Cape Coral, Fla. saw a decline of 33.1%, while prices in Riverside, Calif. dropped 32.7%, and Los Angeles prices are down 29.6%. Las Vegas prices fell 23.6% and Phoenix was down 22.5% for the quarter.


More bargain hunting buyers are coming into the market, according to the Realtors association. "The biggest home-sales gains over the previous quarter have been in some of the markets with the steepest and fastest price drops," said Lawrence Yun, NAR's chief economist. "Buyers in these areas are responding to deeply discounted home prices."


The biggest regional home price declines occurred in the West, where the median home price declined 17.4% to $290,500.


At the same time, sales in that part of the country increased. Existing-home sales were up 25.8% in California, 25% in Nevada, 20.5% in Arizona.


Prices in the South, at $177,000, were almost flat, down just 0.9%, while Florida sales saw an uptick of 10.1% in the quarter.


The Northeast median home sold for $269,000, down 9.6%, and prices in the Midwest were down 4.1% to $161,500.


Among metro areas, Yakima, Wash. posted the largest price increase, up 8.9% year-over-year to $162,300. Binghamton, N.Y. was second with a price jump of 8.7% to $120,900.


Condo prices fell much less than single family homes, down just 3% year-over-year to $220,000 from $226,900. A couple of cities recorded double-digit condo price gains, led by Syracuse, N.Y., up 17.8% to $144,900, and New Orleans, up 15.9% to $192,100. Houston condo prices rose 9.9% to $141,100. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Another bad jump in foreclosures in July - Aug. 14, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The foreclosure juggernaut lurched forward in July as banks took back 77,295 homes - up 8% in a month and 183% in a year, a report issued Thursday shows.


Total foreclosure filings - delinquency notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions - were up 8% from June and 55% year-over-year, according to RealtyTrac, an online marketer of foreclosed homes. One of every 464 U.S. households received at least one filing during the month.


"Bank repossessions, or REOs, continued to be the fastest growing segment of foreclosure activity," said RealtyTrac's chief executive officer, James Saccacio, in a statement. "The sharp rise in REOs, combined with slow sales, has resulted in a bloated inventory of bank-owned properties for sale."


The company says it has more than 750,000 active listings of repossessed homes for sale on its database. That represents about 17% of all the existing homes for sale in the United States as reported by the National Association of Realtors.


Leading states

Foreclosure activity in Nevada, surpassing all other states, touched one in every 106 households in July. Foreclosures in the state were up 15% for the month and were almost double the rate of last July.


Other hard-hit states included California (one of every 182 households), Florida (one of 186) and Arizona (one of 195). For sheer volume, California led the other states with a total of 72,285 filings.


An especially high percentage of the California filings were bank repossessions. There were 23,406 in all, up from just 4,444 in July 2007. The state accounted for more than a third of all such events in the nation. The number was also a big jump from June's total of 20,624 bank repossessions in the state.


"The properties there, once they enter foreclosure, are making a beeline back to the banks," said RealtyTrac's spokesman, Rick Sharga.


Many of the California homes were bought during the height of the frenzy of the mid-2000s at inflated prices. Now that home values have dropped, borrowers who bought at the top owe more than their homes are worth. These properties are almost impossible to refinance and are difficult to sell.


A couple of Midwestern states have also been consistently among the leading foreclosure hot spots and July was no exception. Ohio was fifth in the nation for foreclosures with one for every 375 households. That includes 4,057 bank repossessions, a 33% increase since July 2007. Michigan had 3,933 repossessed homes, or 17% fewer than last July, when it recorded 4,739.


City centers

The worst-hit metro area of the 230 regions that RealtyTrac covers was Cape Coral, Fla. About one of every 64 households in the Gulf Coast city received a filing during the month, more than seven times the national average.


Merced, Calif., with one filing per 73 households, had the second highest foreclosure rate, followed by the nearby Central Valley cities of Stockton and Modesto, which each had about one filing for every 82 households.


The report is bound to disappoint Washington policy makers and lending industry insiders who have stepped up their efforts to slow the massive default problem. June filings, which were down 3% from May, had been a cause for slight optimism.


But, according to Sharga, that decrease was helped along by rule changes in Massachusetts and Maryland that prevented lenders from issuing filings for up to an additional 90 days after borrowers first fall behind in their payments.


That significantly reduced the number of foreclosure filings in both states. In June, for example, Massachusetts recorded a 55% decrease in initial filings.


"Now, both states are creeping back up," he said. "The 90-day lull in Massachusetts is being followed by a whole run of properties [in delinquency]." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Tuesday, August 12, 2008

Lawmakers to investigate Countrywide 'VIP' practice - Aug. 13, 2008


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Two Republicans are calling for an investigation into whether House lawmakers or staffers received preferential treatment from mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp.


The troubled lender, which was sold to Bank of America Corp (BAC, Fortune 500). earlier this year, has been the focus of allegations that it gave favorable loan terms to lawmakers.


Sens. Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and Kent Conrad, D-N.D., have acknowledged receiving mortgages through a VIP program for friends of former Countrywide Chief Executive Angelo Mozilo, but have said they were unaware of any favorable treatment.


Reps. Darrell Issa, R.-Calif., and Mark Souder, R-Ind., are calling on the House ethics committee to examine allegations, made in Conde Nast Portfolio magazine, that House staffers and members also received such treatment.


In a letter sent Tuesday to the ethics committee, Issa and Souder called the report a "serious and broad allegation."


The ethics panel does not comment on investigations. Under its rules, the committee may open an investigation in response to a complaint filed by a lawmaker, but is not required to do so.


Issa and Souder had called on Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, to investigate, but Waxman said last month the ethics panel would be the "appropriate venue" for such an inquiry.


A representative from Bank of America was not immediately available to comment Wednesday afternoon. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Home sellers suffering huge losses - Aug. 13, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- More homeowners than ever are selling at a loss, propelling the real estate market deeper into crisis.


In the 12 months that ended June 30, nearly 25% of all homes sold nationwide fetched less than sellers originally paid, according to real estate Web site Zillow.com.


While the nation's double-digit decline in home prices has been well documented, the new report underscores the economic force of those price declines. Homeowners are walking away with much less in their pocket when they sell. And that affects more than the real estate market.


"It's stunning what's happening out there," said Stan Humphries, Zillow's vice president of data and analytics, who looked at statistics that date back to 1996. "The numbers are the worst we've seen and it's not just the magnitude of the problem but the scope - so many markets are affected."


In Merced, Calif., 63% of homes sold during the past 12 months brought in less than what the owner paid. Prices there have fallen 40% over the past 12 months and 56% from their 2006 peak.


About 63% of sellers in Stockton, Calif., lost money during the same period, 60% in Modesto, Calif., 55% in Las Vegas and 38% in Phoenix.


And the trend has worsened in recent months. In Merced, 74.9% of sellers took a loss when they sold during the three months ended June 30 compared with just 28.7% during the same period in 2007.


The experience of one would-be seller in Cape Coral, Fla., illustrates the kinds of losses sellers are suffering. The homeowner, who asked not to be named, paid $147,000 in 2003 for a three-bed, two-bath ranch. Prices have dropped there more than 22% in the past 12 months.


He said he made a 10% downpayment spent big on upgrades, including two renovated baths. The house was appraised at $279,000 two years ago. Two months ago: $140,000. He has been trying to sell it for more than a year and has dropped the price to $129,900.


"It's terrible," he said. "I'm taking a major loss. I'll probably have to bring a check to the closing."


The short-sale solution

Many sellers are so underwater that their only solution is a short sale. Elsa Bell, a claims adjuster, bought her Riverside, Calif., house in 2006 for $330,000, using a no-down-payment loan. In April she put the house on the market for $275,000, but it hasn't sold.


"The bank is willing to do a short sale, and we have an offer of $170,000 on the house, but we believe the bank will turn that down," Bell said.


A short sale is when a lender agrees to take less than the amount it is owed on a mortgage and forgives the remaining debt.


For Bell, whatever the sale brings, it's going to be a lot less than what she paid.


The good news is that she should get out of the deal fairly clean. Since she has little invested, she has little to lose. The bad news is that a short sale may mean a hit to her credit score.


Nationwide, nearly a third of all homeowners who bought since 2003 owe more on their homes than the homes are worth. And those that, like Bell, put little or none of their own money into the home purchases, are more likely to try to sell short or simply abandon their homes.


"They hand over their keys and walk away from the homes," says Danielle Babb, a real estate investor, instructor at the University of California Irvine and author of "Finding Foreclosures."


That adds to foreclosure rates. Zillow reported that nearly 15% of U.S. existing home sales during the last 12 months involved foreclosed homes.


That trend will almost surely continue.


In Stockton, Calif., 2006 buyers now owe a median of nearly $171,000 more than their homes are worth. In Salinas, Calif., 2006 buyers now have median negative equity of $161,000, and in Merced, the figure is nearly $160,000.


Broader impact

A plethora of sellers taking losses can have a chilling effect on people's lives, says Dean Baker, co-director of the Center for Economic and Policy Research in Washington.


People don't want to sell at a loss, so they put off their plans, whether it's a move for a better job opportunity elsewhere or trading up to a larger home.


"That will delay the [market correction]," said Baker. "It takes time for people to recognize that [these losses] are real."


A quick turnaround is not likely. More than $200 billion in adjustable rate mortgages are scheduled to reset during the second half of 2008, according to the National Association of Realtors, and loans of all types defaulting at high rates. There is also about 11 months of inventory at the current rate of sales.


"With $3.9 million unsold homes on the market, prices will have to come down even more before the market stabilizes," said Zillow's Humphries. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Mortgage application volume drops 1.5% - Aug. 13, 2008


WASHINGTON (AP) -- Mortgage application volume fell 1.5% during the week ended Aug. 8 as fixed interest rates hovered near annual highs, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly application survey.


The MBA's application index fell to 425.9 from 432.6 a week earlier, according to the trade group's survey.


Application volume declined as fixed interest rates rose. The average rate for traditional, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages rose to 6.57% during the week ended Aug. 8, just shy of the 2008 high of 6.59% set last month.


The average rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, which are often a popular choice for refinancing a home, rose to 6.17% from 6.02%. It was the highest average interest rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages this year.


Refinance application volume fell 4.2 % during the week, while purchase volume was flat. Refinance applications accounted for 35.2% of all applications during the week.


The index peaked at 1,856.7 during the week ending May 30, 2003, at the height of the housing boom.


An index value of 100 is equal to the application volume on March 16, 1990, the first week the MBA tracked application volume. A reading of 425.9 means mortgage application activity is 4.259 times higher than it was when the MBA began tracking the data.


The survey provides a snapshot of mortgage lending activity among mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts. It covers about 50% of all residential retail mortgage originations each week.


The average rate for one-year adjustable-rate mortgages declined slightly to 7.15% from 7.17%. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Monday, August 11, 2008

A dead end on the road to housing recovery - Aug. 12, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com ) -- Prime mortgages are starting to record disturbingly high default rates, which could slow any potential housing recovery.


The delinquency rate for prime mortgages worth less than $417,0000 was 2.44% in May, compared with 1.38% during May of 2007, according to LoanPerformance, a unit of First American (FAF, Fortune 500) CoreLogic which compiles and analyzes residential mortgage statistics.


Delinquencies jumped even more for prime loans of more than $417,000, so called jumbo loans. They rose to 4.03% of outstanding loans in May, compared with 1.11% a year earlier.


And prime loans issued in early 2007 are performing the worst of all, failing at a rate nearly triple that of prime loans issued in 2006 according to LoanPerformance.


"The extent of how bad these loans are doing is very troubling," said Pat Newport, real estate economist with Global Insight, a forecasting firm.


Washington Mutual (WM, Fortune 500) CEO Kerry Killinger said on an earnings call last month that the bank's prime loan delinquencies are on the rise. As of June 30, 2.19% of the prime loans issued by WaMu in 2007 were already delinquent, compared with 1.40% of prime loans issued in 2005.


And on a July earnings call, JP Morgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) CEO Jaime Dimon, called prime mortgage performance "terrible," and suggested that losses connected to prime may triple. For the second quarter, the bank reported net charges of $104 million for prime rate delinquencies, more than double the $50 million recorded three months earlier.


The latest shoe

Prime loans are just the latest class of mortgages to see a spike in failure rates. The first lot to go bad was, of course, subprime mortgages, which set the housing meltdown in motion. Next were the Alt-A loans, a class somewhere between prime and subprime loans that doesn't require strict documentation of a borrower's assets or income.


Now, as prime loans are added into the mix, the resulting foreclosures could haunt the housing market for a long time, according to Global Insight's Patrick Newport.


"Home prices will drop for quite a while," he said, "maybe several years."


Prices are already off nearly 20% from their 2006 highs, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price index.


And there's a strong inverse correlation between home prices and defaults, according to Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association of Realtors.


"It's a feedback loop," he said. "Price declines lead to more defaults, which leads to more price declines."


More foreclosures will add to an already massive oversupply of homes on the market. Inventories are up to about 11 month's worth of sales at the current rate.


Indeed, about 2.8% of all homes for sale were vacant as of June 30, according to the Census Bureau's statistics. That's up about 50% from three years ago, and near historic highs.


More foreclosures, fewer loans

The failure of prime mortgages will also make it more difficult for new borrowers to find affordable loans - and that will slow sales even more. Lending standards have been tightening for months, but if prime loans start to look risky, lenders will be even more conservative about who gets a mortgage.


About 60% of the loan officers surveyed reported that they tightened lending standards for prime mortgages during the first three months of 2008, according to the April 2008 Senior Loan Officer Opinion Survey on Bank Lending Practices from the Federal Reserve, which is released quarterly.


That number will likely be even higher for the second quarter, according to Mike Larson, a real estate analyst for Weiss Research. "It's already harder and more expensive to get loans," he said. "Lenders pull in their horns when things go south."


While easy credit fueled the housing boom, restricted credit is certainly contributing to the bust.


"Eventually," said Newport, "time will break the cycle. Pricing will drop enough to attract more buyers, and inventories will decline."


But there will probably more hard times ahead before markets come back into balance and recovery begins. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Thursday, August 7, 2008

Government regulators expand scrutiny of Countrywide - Aug. 8, 2008


LOS ANGELES (AP) -- The Securities and Exchange Commission has escalated its scrutiny of Countrywide Financial Corp. into a formal investigation, according to a regulatory filing by Bank of America Corp.


The document, filed Thursday, did not specify what aspect of the lender the SEC's probe is focused on, although regulators launched an informal inquiry into Countrywide Chairman and CEO Angelo Mozilo's stock trades last fall.


Bank of America, which finalized its acquisition of Countrywide last month, also noted in the filing that Countrywide has responded to subpoenas from the SEC.


Representatives for Charlotte, N.C.-based Bank of America and Countrywide declined to comment beyond the filing Friday.


A call to an SEC spokeswoman in California was not immediately returned.


The Los Angeles Times reported Friday that the SEC probe centers on whether Mozilo's stock trades violated the law and whether the lender's financial disclosures misled investors.


The newspaper based its report on unnamed persons close to the investigation.


Mozilo, who is no longer with Countrywide, could not immediately be reached for comment.


Suspicious trading

Mozilo's trades of Countrywide stock began drawing negative attention last year as the company's stock price tumbled.


The executive exercised options on thousands of shares of common stock through a prearranged trading plan, but the timing of changes in the stock-selling program drew shareholder criticism.


The changes, which were made in the months before the company's stock plunged, allowed Mozilo to significantly increase his sales of Countrywide shares.


Mozilo has denied making any improper trades and has said he is cooperating with the SEC.


Since the collapse of the subprime mortgage market last summer, Countrywide has been hit with lawsuits by investors, consumers and state officials in California, Illinois, Florida and Connecticut.


On Aug. 11, a U.S. Bankruptcy Court judge in Pittsburgh is set to review an agreement in which Countrywide agreed to pay a bankruptcy trustee $325,000 to settle allegations that the mortgage lender sought improper fees or payments from bankrupt homeowners and otherwise violated bankruptcy court orders and regulations in nearly 300 cases.


Countrywide acknowledged errors in handling some debts, but it had denied any systematic effort to thwart bankruptcy protections to collect money.


Countrywide is also among the companies being investigated by the FBI as part of the agency's probe into the financial services industry in the wake of the mortgage meltdown.


Shares of Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) rose 73 cents, or 2.3%, to $32.25 Friday. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Mortgages get more expensive - again - Aug. 8, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The good news: Mortgage giant Fannie Mae is taking steps to shore up its finances. The bad news: You're going to pay for it when you take out a mortgage.


Fannie plays a central role in the market for home mortgages by purchasing loans, securitizing them and selling them to investors. In announcing announcing a $2.3 billion loss on Friday, it also said it would make major changes that could have a significant effect on mortgage liquidity and pricing.


The company said it will increase its fees, stop buying certain high-risk loans and charge a higher risk premium for buying loans in the declining market.


"[These actions] have raised the costs of mortgage credit and reduced its availability," said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com. "Policy makers had been hoping they would move forward to provide more credit and now they're just hoping they don't pull back."


The increases were inevitable, according to Keith Gumbinger of HSH Associates, a publisher of mortgage loan information.


"The cost of mortgage credit is getting pushed higher by the issues in the marketplace," he said. "They can't reduce their market exposure and that means more expensive mortgages."


Point taken! Times are tough

Fannie increased fees for some loans by a quarter of a percentage point, based on borrowers' credit scores and the amount of their down payments. It will charge, for example, 1% (up from 0.75%) for a buyer with a credit score of 680 paying 20% down.


And Fannie (FNM, Fortune 500) doubled its "adverse market delivery charge" to 0.5%. That is an across-the-board fee assessed against every loan Fannie buys, according to a Fannie spokeswoman. Fannie first instituted the charge this spring.


"It's very negative," said Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association of Realtors. "Any time there's an additional imposition of fees in obtaining a mortgage, it knocks some potential buyers out of the market."


Fannie's smaller cousin, Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500), which also announced a big loss this week, has been taking similar steps to shore up in finances and reduce its exposure to risky loans.


The additional fees imposed by Fannie will hit newcomers particularly hard, according to Yun. First-time buyers are usually most on the margins and struggling to afford a home purchase. The added fees will be passed on to borrowers and could mean quarter-point increases in interest rates.


Reducing the number of first-time buyers can have a domino effect on the market. Existing homeowners looking to trade up to bigger, more expensive homes may postpone doing so because they can't sell their present home.


Bye-bye to Alt-A loans

Fannie will also eliminate buying Alt-A loans by the end of 2008. Alt-A loans, a category between prime and subprime, accounted for about 11% of the company's loans during the last years of the boom. They have been used mostly by people who couldn't or wouldn't document their incomes, their assets or both. These buyers will find it harder to obtain financing once Fannie stops buying the loans.


According to Yun, however, the cutback in Alt-A will hurt people buying second homes to rent out or resell, rather than first time homeowners.


"These are people who often rely on their good credit to buy investment properties putting little or no money down," he said.


But removing some of them from the market will decrease demand in a market already struggling with high inventory.


Fannie and Freddie, as private companies created and sponsored by the government, have to foster home ownership while satisfying their shareholders. They have to maintain profitability or risk triggering a government rescue.


"They were created to provide liquidity in times of crisis," said Yun. "If they don't do that, what's the point of having Fannie and Freddie in the first place?" 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Finding gold in foreclosures - Aug. 8, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Hoping to score a house on the cheap by buying a foreclosed property? There are good deals out there, but the process is complicated and risky. Here's what you need to know.


There are certainly plenty of foreclosed homes on the market. In California, 40% of existing homes sold in the second quarter were foreclosures, according to DataQuick, a provider of real estate information, compared with 5.4% a year earlier.


Indeed, Fannie Mae CEO Daniel Mudd said Friday that the company is pushing hard to sell more foreclosed properties, to get them off the books. "I don't think this is a time to be holding onto REOs and hoping for a better day," he said.


Steve Dexter, author of "Prospering in the Rising Wave of Foreclosures," has bought dozens of foreclosed homes and thinks now is a good time to dive in. "It's the best way to buy, and it's time to buy again," said


There are three different stages of foreclosure, each of which presents different opportunities for buyers. The first step is to figure out which one makes the most sense for you.


Pre-foreclosure

A home goes into pre-foreclosure when a borrower has fallen behind on his payments, but the house has yet to be auctioned off.


Buyers can find pre-foreclosures by poring over the delinquency notices that lenders file with county courthouses when a borrower misses a payment.


Armed with prospects, buyers should go scouting. If they see homes they like, they should contact the owners to see if they want to sell.


"You call them or knock on their doors and say, 'I know you're having a problem and I think I can help you,' " said Alexis McGee, co-founder of Foreclosures.com.


McGee only buys when she figures she can make a profit of 30% or more; marketing and other expenses wipe out about half that by the time she resells. But people buying a house to live in might be happy with a 20% discount from market value.


Cold calling and making low-ball offers on people's homes can be difficult: Some owners are emotional, even angry. Many are trying to hold onto their houses and don't appreciate what they consider scavengers sniffing around.


"But you're not taking advantage of these homeowners," said Duane LeGate, president of HouseBuyerNetwork.com, which puts together buyers and sellers of distressed properties. "All many of them want is financial relief from bad mortgages, and you're offering it."


Indeed, some owners are open to doing what's called a short sale, which is when a buyer pays less for a house than the mortgage that is owed on it. Lenders must agree to a short sale, and will then forgive the rest of the debt.


Often, banks are reluctant to do such deals, since it requires them to take a loss. It can take months and a lot of badgering before a deal goes through, and not every buyer is up for that kind of hassle.


But as the housing market deteriorates, lenders are warming up to short sales, according to Foreclosure.com founder Brad Geisen. "It makes a lot more financial sense for them to liquidate early rather than go through the foreclosure process," he said, which can cost lenders about $50,000.


Gabe Cera recently bought one through an associate of LeGate, Raul Pineyro, owner of Cacophony Group Real Estate Services in Dade County, Fla. Cera purchased a four-bed, three-bath in Miami for about $60,000 less than what the owner's mortgage was worth.


"I'm very satisfied," Cera said. "The transaction was very smooth and quick and I think I saved a lot of money."


In buying any pre-foreclosure, LeGate advises buyers to not be turned off by dirty carpets or ugly paint jobs. That's where the best deals are.


"Anybody can go the Home Depot (HD, Fortune 500) and buy some paint and a new rug," he said.


Sheriffs' sales

In the next stage of foreclosure, homes in default are auctioned off on the county courthouse steps. These homes can be real bargains, but the process is a crap shoot.


Bidders can't inspect the property, so there's no telling how much work it needs. And there is also no telling what kind of liens there are against the home, due to unpaid taxes and so forth, which can also jack up the cost of these homes. Finally, Buyers need to come with cash, ready to put 10%-20% down on the spot, and able to pony up the rest in a matter of days.


"If you want to buy on the courthouse steps," said LeGate, "you'd better be a pro."


Even after a purchase, a deal can fall through if the current owner can come up with enough cash to repay the buyer the amount of the winning bid.


LeGate himself has bought several homes at auction, with mixed results.


"The first time, I bought, renovated and sold the house all within 29 days and made a killing," he said. "I thought I was a mini-Donald Trump. The second time, the previous owner poured cement into the pipes before he left and when I turned on the water, it clogged everything. I lost more on the second house than I made on the first."


Post-foreclosure

After a lender takes back a house, the property goes back on the market as what's called an REO (real estate owned) property. These are treated like ordinary sales, listed with a broker. Typically, bargains are not as sharp.


Author Steve Dexter advises house hunters to go to the Web sites of all the major lenders and look for REOs in their communities. Alternatively, "Get a young, hungry real estate agent who's screening REOs all the time and put them to work for you," he said. Foreclosures for sale may also be found on the sites of Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) and Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500), as well as eBay (EBAY, Fortune 500).


Dexter prefers to buy REOs because the process is so clean; the title is clear and the property is delivered vacant, even if the prices aren't as good. He says one bank manager told him he usually sells REOs for 95% of listing prices, on average.


"You might not think that's too great for buyers," said Dexter, "but the listing prices are lower [than market value]," usually by 10% or more. The total discounts often exceed 15%.


Another way to buy an REO is through an REO auction. As bank portfolios of these properties have swollen, they've started to unload them en masse. Pam McKissick, chief operating officer of Williams & Williams, an auction company based in Tulsa, said her company buys big portfolios of post-foreclosure properties from lenders and then auctions them to individual buyers.


The REOs that Williams & Williams pick up are usually sold within 30 days; successful bids can be quite low. "It's a very rapid process," said McKissick, " You want to put a family back into a home quickly and bring the neighborhood back. This does that." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Wednesday, August 6, 2008

Long-term mortgage rates hold steady - Aug. 7, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Interest rates for long-term mortgages held steady this week as the troubled housing market continued to weigh on the nation's economy, Freddie Mac reported Thursday.


The government-backed mortgage finance giant said rates for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.52% for the week ending Thursday, unchanged from last week.


The recent average remains lower from the same time last year when rates for 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.59%.


The news came as the housing market - with record foreclosures and sinking home sales prices - continued to take a toll.


"The housing market is continuing to act as a drag on the economy," Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac's vice president and chief economist, said in a statement. "Residential fixed investment subtracted 0.6 percentage points off second-quarter growth in real GDP."


Inventory still high. Mortgage applications increased slightly for the week ended Aug. 1, but were still much lower compared with the same week last year, the Mortgage Bankers Association said Wednesday.


The MBA said its Market Composite Index -- a measure of mortgage loan application volume -- was 432.6, up a seasonally unadjusted 2.4% compared with the previous week and down 33.7% from a year earlier.


"Although showing some initial signs of improvement, the inventory of unsold homes remains at historically high levels," Nothaft said.


There was some promising housing news on Thursday, however. The number of pending homes for sale rose 5.3% in June, a surprise rebound from the previous month, according to the National Association of Realtors. However, sales are still down 12.3% from last year. (Full story)


The country's homeownership rate, meanwhile, essentially held steady during the second quarter of this year, compared to the previous quarter and second quarter of 2007, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.


Rates for other types of mortgages were mixed.


Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) said 15-year fixed-rate mortgages this week had rates averaging 6.10%, an increase from last week when they averaged 6.07%. A year ago, the 15-year mortgages averaged 6.25%.


Five-year Treasury-indexed hybrid adjustable-rate mortgages averaged 6.05% this week, down from last week when they averaged 6.07%. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 6.33%, Freddie Mac said.


One-year Treasury-indexed ARMs averaged 5.22% this week, down from last week when it averaged 5.27%. A year ago, the one-year ARM averaged 5.65%. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Can $4B stabilize foreclosure-plagued areas? - Aug. 7, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- City officials and community activists can't wait to get their hands on nearly $4 billion the federal government is about to inject into blighted neighborhoods suffering from record foreclosures.


Opponents of the measure say the paltry sum won't do much good considering the number of vacant homes on the market - one million families are expected to lose their homes this year - and will more likely turn into a political boondoggle.


It remains to be seen which side is right. But the program - part of the massive housing rescue bill Bush enacted last month despite his own misgivings - will serve as one test of Washington's ability to mitigate the foreclosure crisis.


The U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development is expected in late September to come up with a formula for how to distribute $3.92 billion to states and cities nationwide to turn foreclosed property to affordable housing for sale or rent.


The funds are intended to help communities deal with the flood of vacant homes, which drain public resources and drag down property values of neighboring houses.


"This money will help get neighborhoods hard hit by foreclosures back on their feet again," said Jeff Falcusan, policy advisor for the National Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials, a trade group.


Congress mandated that the money be allocated based on the number and percentage of foreclosures, homes financed with subprime loans and homes in default or delinquency in the community. Once the formula is set, HUD has 30 days to dole out the funds. Government officials then have 18 months to put the money to use in their neighborhoods.


In addition to buying and fixing up homes, municipalities can use the money to demolish blighted structures and redevelop vacant land. The foreclosed property must be bought at a discount from its current appraised value to avoid bailing out the lenders.


Local governments could rehab the properties on their own or with the help of public housing authorities. They could also partner with community groups.


The program is also designed to increase the affordable housing stock in the community. The law mandates that the homes be sold or rented to families at or below 120% of the area median income, with one-quarter of the funds set aside for families at or below 50% of median income.


Communities "will have the opportunity to put these houses back into productive use," said Steve Adamske, communications director for the House Committee of Financial Services.


Vacant homes = trouble

Vacant properties can cause big problems for municipalities. As the number of abandoned homes multiplies, property tax revenues fall. Yet, the vacant houses often require more public resources, including frequent visits by police, health department and code enforcement officials. And they hurt property values of surrounding houses.


In Tucson, Ariz., which has been hit hard in the housing slump, abandoned pools have been a particular concern because they attract West Nile-carrying mosquitoes, said Emily Nottingham, the city's community services director. Neighbors also complain about dilapidated houses and overgrown gardens.


"It can really become an eyesore for a neighborhood," she said. Vacant houses "can attract squatters and if the weeds are overgrown, it's harder for adjoining houses to be sold. Pools turn green and attract mosquitoes."


Foreclosures are a widespread problem in Tucson. It already has 4,000 foreclosed properties on the market and is expecting the number to grow. The city is projecting 8,000 homes to enter foreclosure this year - some of which are already up for sale - and another 8,000 in 2009.


The key to using the federal funds most effectively is concentrating efforts in particular neighborhoods rather than scattering the money around town, experts said.


"Target neighborhoods where it can make a difference," said Buzz Roberts, senior vice president for policy at Local Initiatives Support Corp., a national non-profit group which focuses on rebuilding low-income communities.


Local rehab efforts

Rehabbing blighted communities is nothing new for many municipalities and community groups, experts said. Numerous efforts are underway to address the mess left behind in the foreclosure crisis, said Ali Solis, vice president for public policy and industry relations at Enterprise Community Partners, a non-profit group that develops and finances affordable housing.


For instance, Living Cities, a collaboration of corporations and philanthropies, is doling out $10 million in grants to renovate foreclosed properties. The initial recipients include Dallas, Detroit, New York and Washington, D.C.


In Cincinnati, local officials are hoping to use the federal funds to augment a $1.25 million revitalization effort already in the works, said Michael Cervay, director of community development.


The funds should allow the city to demolish or fix up hundreds of vacant homes. The city has about half of the 5,600 homes that went into foreclosure in Hamilton County in 2007. Even more foreclosures are expected this year.


"It will make a significant impact on the problem in Cincinnati," he said.


A drop in the bucket

Some foreclosure experts, however, said that the funding is too little to have any real effect, especially in the hardest hit areas. California, for example, had 209,000 homes go into foreclosure over the past year, said Sean O'Toole, founder of foreclosureradar.com, a foreclosed properties website for real estate professionals.


"$4 billion is kind of a meaningless sum," O'Toole said. "It can't possibly make a difference. You've brought a pistol to a nuclear war."


Converting foreclosed houses into livable homes may prove a big challenge for many municipalities, said David John, senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank. He foresees a lot of the funding going to waste in poor planning or fraud.


Also, because of the weak housing market, local officials might find themselves unable to unload the houses once they are renovated at a price the recoups the repair costs, he said.


"The money could be better used for other purposes," John said. "State and local government have a rather bad record of managing this kind of activity. They don't really have much expertise in retail housing." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]