Wednesday, July 30, 2008

Freddie enlists loan servicers in foreclosure prevention - Jul. 31, 2008


NEW YORK (AP) -- Freddie Mac is doubling the amount of money it pays loan servicers for each successful mortgage workout among other measures to keep struggling borrowers out of foreclosure, it said Thursday.


The mortgage financier is also giving more time to negotiate workouts in states with fast foreclosure processes and will reimburse servicers for door-to-door outreach.


Freddie will pay $500 for each repayment plan and $800 for each loan modification on Freddie-owned mortgages. Servicers will receive $2,200 for each short sale where Freddie accepts less than the full amount owed on the mortgage.


In some states and Washington, D.C., the government-sponsored entity will give up to 10 months from the due date of the last payment to find sustainable workouts for strapped borrowers. These states allow a lender to foreclose in less than 10 months.


The affected states are Alabama, Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Georgia, Hawaii, Maryland, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, North Carolina, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Virginia, West Virginia and Wyoming.


Freddie also will reimburse a servicer up to $15 per mortgage for leaving a door hanger and up to $50 per mortgage for knocking on a door that results in the borrower contacting their servicer.


These new policies go into effect Aug. 1. The outreach reimbursement expires March 31, 2009.


Shares of Freddie (FRE, Fortune 500) fell 25 cents, or 2.9%, to $8.48 in midday training. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Subprime fraud ran rampant in New York - Jul. 31, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Mortgage scammers took advantage of loopholes in New York State lending laws to defraud homeowners and lending institutions all over the state, according to a new report released Thursday.


The New York State Commission of Investigations reported that the state's mortgage borrowers need more regulatory protection from predatory lenders. It also linked subprime loans closely to New York's growing foreclosure problem; in 2007, 59% of all foreclosures statewide involved subprime loans.


New York had 39,000 properties with foreclosure filings in 2007, according to RealtyTrac, the online marketer of foreclosed properties, ranking eighth in the nation behind states like California, Nevada and Florida.


"The principle focus of this investigation was subprime mortgage fraud," stated the Commission's chairman, Alfred Lerner, in a press release accompanying the report, "but it was impossible not to recoil at the extremely worrisome statistics in the subprime lending market in general. We are seeing foreclosures among New York's subprime mortgage holders at alarming rates, a situation made far worse by unscrupulous appraisers and brokers."


A 400 hour workweek

Many of the most egregious cases involved clearly predatory lending practices in which there was never any possibility that the borrowers could afford to pay off their loans.


In one example from 2006, Suzette Francis, a woman with two young children, no assets, working as a $10-an-hour security guard and living in a homeless shelter, obtained a mortgage for $470,000 that, as the report stated, "exhibited...every characteristic and feature associated with dangerous subprime loans."


Francis had down payment and no proven income or assets. Her adjustable rate mortgage started at 10.8% and was capped at 16.85%. At that rate, even her initial monthly payment came to more than $4,400. She would have to work 400 hours a month just to pay her loan.


"I'm, like, in a million dollar debt in housing and cash poor," Francis told the Commission while testifying earlier this year.


The fact that this kind of lending went on in New York, which has relatively strong lending regulations, suggests that similar abuses may have been even more widespread in states with more relaxed laws.


Targeting minorities

Particularly targeted all over the nation have been minority communities. The Commission found that, all other things equal, New York state African-American and Hispanic borrowers were twice as likely to have subprime loans as whites.


"A lot of 'one-stop-shops,' where real estate agents are also mortgage brokers, operate in minority neighborhoods," said Mary Biunno, senior assistant counsel for the Commission, "and they rope in a lot of people."


Some of these operations profit by giving clients poor advice in order to get fees and commissions for arranging sales and loans. They provide appraisers and attorneys who work for them rather than for the clients.


"Customers in minority communities eligible for prime loans have been pushed into taking out high-risk subprime loans by shady mortgage brokers," the report said.


The Commission issued several recommendations to avoid future problems including:



  • Instituting standardized regulations governing the industry which apply to all the professionals - real estate agents, mortgage brokers and loan officers, attorneys and appraisers. All must be licensed and fulfill educational requirements.

  • Banning the practice of brokers taking on dual rolls. The report stated, "The potential for conflict of interest and outright criminality is so great [when one] individual acts as both real estate broker/agent and mortgage broker...in a single...transaction [it] should be prohibited.

  • Improving borrower education and outreach efforts to draw more borrowers into financial literacy programs. The state should consider mandating pre-purchase financial counseling for all subprime borrowers.


It will be a challenge to follow through on these recommendations, since federal regulations take precedence over state laws, nullifying New York's attempts to protect consumers. So the Commission also recommended that New York solicit cooperation from federal regulators such as the Federal Reserve, FDIC and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency.


At a minimum, according to the Commission, national banks should be requested to share data on subprime loans with the states.


The single best piece of advice that Biunno had for anyone buying a home is to hire their own attorney.


"It may add to the expense a little," she said, "but when people go to buy a home, they should have a trusted attorney and they should never take a recommendation from a real estate agent." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Mortgage rates drop as commodities ease - Jul. 31, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Mortgage rates fell slightly this week according to a weekly report released Wednesday, as lower oil prices briefly ease fears of price inflation.


The Primary Mortgage Market Survey from mortgage finance company Freddie Mac said that rates of 30-year fixed-rate mortgages (FRMs) averaged 6.52% for the week ended July 31 with an average 0.7 point discount, down from an average 6.63% last week, and down from an average of 6.68% recorded during the same week last year.


The 15-year FRM averaged 6.07% this week with an average of 0.6 point, down from 6.18% last week, and down from 6.32% last year.


A point, or "discount point," can be purchased at the time of closing to decrease the mortgage rate. Each point costs 1% of the loan amount and each point that a borrower purchases lowers the the loan interest rate.


Five-year adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 6.07% this week, with an average 0.6 point, down from last week when it averaged 6.16%. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 6.29%.


One-year ARMs averaged 5.27% this week with an average 0.6 point, down from last week when it was 5.49%. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 5.59%.


"Mortgage rates moved lower this week as a drop in commodity prices eased market concerns over inflation pressures," said Freddie Mac chief economist Frank Nothaft in a statement.


The price of gasoline at the pump continued to fall below $4 a gallon as crude oil prices have fallen nearly $23 a barrel over the past several weeks from its peak of $147.27 on July 11.


"Yes, there is some influence in hope for less inflation pressure, but we'd need a more extended period of these softening prices" to see a significant decline, said Keith Gumbinger, vice president of HSHAssociates.com, an online publisher of consumer loan information. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Hope Now reports record mortgage workouts - Jul. 30, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A record number of American homeowners are seeking - and getting - help to solve their mortgage woes.


According to the Hope Now coalition of mortgage lenders, servicers, investors and community advocacy groups, more than 76,000 at-risk mortgage borrowers had their loans permanently modified in June to make them more affordable, with lower interest rates, reduced principal or both. That's up about 9% from May and 26% from January.


Another 105,000 homeowners were given repayment plans, which means that they'll have extra time to make up missed payments. Repayment plans, which don't reduce a borrower's debt load and are generally considered to be less effective at helping homeowners, made up about 58% of all the mortgage work outs in June.


"The industry continues to accelerate the pace at which it is helping homeowners and expects this positive trend to continue," said Hope Now's Executive Director Faith Schwartz.


Hope Now says it has helped a total of 1.9 million homeowners since its program launched in July, 2007.


But all this has still failed to stem the rising foreclosure tide. The coalition reported that more than 82,039 people lost their homes to foreclosure during the month, up 12% from May. This flood of vacant homes on the market is pushing prices down further. On Tuesday, the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city Home Price Index showed that in May home prices dropped a record 15.8% from a year ago.


A new law

The Hope Now report was released just hours after President Bush signed the massive housing rescue bill, which allocates $300 billion to help at-risk borrowers refinance their unaffordable old mortgages into new low-cost fixed-rate loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration.


That will give Hope Now's 26 members another means to help homeowners. Under the bill, lenders and servicers must voluntarily lower borrower's mortgage balances to 90% of current market value, and pay the FHA a fee equal to 3% of the new principal.


The group also reported the results of a survey of its members it conducted to determine the extent of the industry's exposure to subprime ARM resets.


It found that about 928,000 of these loans had been scheduled for reset during the first half of 2008. Of that total, some 382,000, or 41%, have been refinanced, while 57,000, or 6% of them, have been modified and given more favorable loan terms. Less than 1% of these borrowers who were current with their payments when their loan reset went into default.


Better guidelines

Hope Now recently introduced a number of revised policies in order to help more delinquent borrowers stay in their homes.


It has pledged faster response times to borrowers seeking work outs. That means its members will acknowledge work out requests within five days, keep borrowers informed on the status of the work outs and give them either an approval or denial, within 45 days.


Hope Now has also stepped up its outreach efforts, making sure at-risk borrowers are aware of work out options. Its members are sending letters to subprime adjustable rate mortgage (ARM) borrowers 120 days before their loans reset warning them that their payments will go up soon, and offering credit counseling.


Additionally, the coalition has teamed with community groups to participate in 14 massive foreclosure prevention work shops around the country, which put borrowers together with credit counselors and lenders to quickly reach workable solutions to mortgage payment problems. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Mortgage applications hit 2008 low, MBA survey says - Jul. 30, 2008


NEW YORK (AP) -- Mortgage application volume tumbled 14.1% during the week ending July 25, hitting its lowest level of the year, according to the Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly application survey.


Volume fell even though interest rates on fixed-rate mortgages retreated from sharp increases a week earlier.


Refinance volume plunged 22.9% during the week, while purchase application volume fell 7.8%. Refinance applications accounted for 35.2% of total application volume during the week.


The overall application index fell to 420.8 from 489.6 a week earlier.


An index value of 100 is equal to the application volume on March 16, 1990, the first week the MBA tracked such data. The index peaked at 1,856.7 during the week ending May 30, 2003, at the height of the housing boom.


The survey provides a snapshot of mortgage lending activity among mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts. It covers about 50% of all residential retail mortgage originations each week.


The average rate for traditional, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages fell to 6.46% from 6.59% during the previous week. Rates for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages - often a popular option for refinancing a home - fell to 5.98% from 6.10%.


The average rate for one-year adjustable-rate mortgages rose to 7.25% from 7.16% a week earlier. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


How the housing rescue bill can help you - Jul. 30, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush signed a $300 billion housing rescue bill Wednesday aimed at helping troubled homeowners avoid foreclosure and supporting mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


After the law kicks in on Oct. 1, thousands of at-risk borrowers will be able to refinance their unaffordable old mortgages into new low-cost fixed-rate loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).


The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 400,000 borrowers with $68 billion in loans may benefit from the program - but the bill allows for as many as 1 million or 2 million borrowers to participate in the program.


Here's what homeowners need to know.


Who's eligible?

Qualified borrowers must live in their homes and have loans that were issued between January 2005 and June 2007. Additionally, they must be spending at least 31% of their gross monthly income on mortgage debt to be eligible for the program.


They can be up to date on their existing mortgage or in default, but either way borrowers must prove that they will not be able to keep paying their existing mortgage - and attest that they are not deliberately defaulting just to obtain lower payments.


Before homeowners can get FHA-backed mortgages, they must first retire any other debt on the home, such as a home equity loan or line of credit. Borrowers are not permitted to take out another home equity loan for at least five years, unless it's to pay for necessary upkeep on the home.


To get a new home equity loan, borrowers will need approval from the FHA, and total debt cannot exceed 95% of the home's appraised value at the time.


How can I apply?

Borrowers can contact their current mortgage servicer or go directly to an FHA-approved lender for help. These lenders can be found on the Web site of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.


How does the refinancing process work?

This is a voluntary program, so lenders holding the original mortgage have to agree to rework a given loan before things can get started. The bill requires lenders to make major concessions, writing down the value of the loan to 90% of the home's current value. In areas where prices have plummeted by as much as 20%, that will mean a substantial loss for the lender.


But lenders won't sign off on a workout unless they think that they'll lose less money on that than they would by allowing a home to go through the costly foreclosure process.


Each loan will have to be underwritten by an FHA lender on a case-by-case basis. That means the banks will do a new appraisal to determine the home's current value, as well as examine and verify income statements, bank accounts, job histories and credit scores.


Based on that new appraised home value, the FHA lender must determine how much the original lender has to reduce the original mortgage, so that it will reflect 90% of the home's market value.


If the original lender agrees to the writedown, the new lender buys the old loan and takes over the reworked mortgage.


As part of the deal, the old lender writes off any fees and penalties on the original mortgage, including prepayment penalties, and accepts the proceeds from the new loan on a paid-in-full basis. Additionally, it pays the FHA an up-front premium equal to 3% of the mortgage principal.


What does it cost?

There should be little up-front costs for borrowers to bear. Loan origination fees will vary by lender, but these can usually be paid by the borrower over the life of the loan in the form of a slightly higher interest rate.


However, the refinanced loans do come with many strings. For one thing, borrowers are responsible for paying an insurance premium to the FHA guaranteeing the loan, which will be 1.5% of the principal annually.


Borrowers also agree to share any profits from future home-price appreciation with the FHA. To do that, they'll pay a "3% exit fee" of the mortgage principal to the FHA when they resell or refinance.


Plus, they'll agree to pay the FHA 100% of any profits they realize from higher home prices if they sell or refinance within a year. So if the original loan principal is $200,000 and the home sells for $250,000, the borrower will owe the FHA $50,000, minus costs.


After a year, borrowers will share 90% of the profits with the FHA. The percentage keeps dropping in 10% increments to 50% after the fifth year, where it stays.


What will I save?

Savings depend on what borrowers are paying for their present loan and where they live, but for most people it will be substantial, even after factoring in the FHA fees.


In areas that have sustained huge price drops, such as Sacramento, Calif., where prices have fallen by about 30% over the past year, some loans might be reduced by more than 40%.


Additionally, the FHA loans carry reasonable interest rates, which are fixed for the life of the loan, as opposed to a subprime adjustable-rate mortgage that can jump higher every six months. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Bush signs housing rescue bill into law - Jul. 30, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- President Bush on Wednesday signed into law a sweeping housing bill that aims to boost the struggling housing market and bolster mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


The Senate voted 72-13 in favor of the bill on Saturday, after the House passed it three days earlier.


"We look forward to put in place new authorities to improve confidence and stability in markets, and to provide better oversight for Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac," said White House spokesman Tony Fratto. "The Federal Housing Administration will begin to implement new policies intended to keep more deserving American families in their homes."


The new law, one of the most far-reaching on housing in decades, marks the centerpiece of Washington's efforts to address the nation's housing meltdown.


The legislation has two principal objectives: to offer affordable government-backed mortgages to homeowners at risk of foreclosure, and to bolster Fannie and Freddie with a temporary rescue plan and a new, more stringent regulator.


The White House last week reversed its long-standing threat to veto the bill. In fact, the administration still objects to parts of the legislation, including aid to states to buy foreclosed properties.


But the president decided to sign it since "oversight of the housing government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) and the new temporary authorities requested by [Treasury] Secretary [Henry] Paulson are urgently needed now, and they'll contribute to confidence and stability in housing and financial markets," Fratto said last week.


Helping at-risk borrowers

Provisions that will most directly affect consumers and communities include:


A larger role for the Federal Housing Administration. The FHA will be allowed to insure up to $300 billion in new 30-year fixed-rate mortgages for at-risk borrowers in owner-occupied homes if their lenders agree to write down loan balances to 90% of the homes' current appraised value.


The cost of the new FHA program - which would begin on Oct. 1 and be in place for just a few years - will be funded by fees from Fannie and Freddie, along with fees paid by both lenders and borrowers.


While the law authorizes the FHA to insure up to $300 billion in loans, the CBO estimates that the agency is only likely to insure up to $68 billion and help keep roughly 325,000 people in their homes. Those estimates were based on the CBO's assessment of who is likely to qualify under the program and accounts for a certain number likely to default anyway.


(Here are more details on this provision.)


A stronger regulator for the GSEs. The new regulator will have a greater say over how well funded the two government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) are - a major concern in the markets that has sent stocks in both companies plunging in the past two months.


A permanent increase in "conforming loan" limits. The law will permanently increase the cap on the size of mortgages guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie to a maximum of $625,500 from $417,000.


The FHA maximum loan limits for high-cost areas would also increase to a maximum of $625,500. Higher loan limits will make it easier for borrowers to get mortgages, because those mortgages are more likely to be traded if they are considered conforming.


A new home-buyer credit. The new law includes a tax refund for first-time home buyers worth up to 10% of a home's purchase price but no more than $7,500.


The refund, however, serves more as an interest-free loan, since it would have to be paid back over 15 years in equal installments.


A ban on down-payment assistance from sellers. The new law eliminates a program that has allowed sellers to provide down payment assistance for FHA loans.


The law would also increase to 3.5% from 3% the down payment requirement for borrowers getting FHA loans.


A new affordable housing trust fund. The law establishes a permanent fund to promote affordable housing. The fund will be paid for by fees from Fannie and Freddie.


Grants to states to buy foreclosed properties. The law grants $4 billion to states to buy up and rehabilitate foreclosed properties. The White House has opposed such funding, contending that it will benefit lenders and not homeowners.


Bolster Fannie and Freddie

A late and controversial addition to the new housing law provides temporary authority for the Treasury to lend a financial hand to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac if the Treasury deems it necessary to help stabilize markets.


Concerns over whether Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) will have enough money to weather future losses in the housing market has sent shares plummeting in recent weeks. Since the beginning of June, Fannie's stock price has dropped 57% and Freddie's plummeted 66%. For the past year, they're both down roughly 85% as of the end of trade on Friday.


Fannie and Freddie guarantee the purchase and trade of mortgages and own or back $5.2 trillion in mortgages.


The law includes provisions that let Treasury offer Fannie and Freddie an unlimited line of credit and buy stock in the companies. The provisions expire in 18 months.


Both critics and supporters of the Paulson plan have expressed concern that loaning or investing money in the companies could leave taxpayers with a fat bill to pay.


Treasury Secretary Paulson has said that merely having the powers in place may boost confidence in the two companies enough to preclude the need for Treasury to step in.


The Congressional Budget Office last week estimated the potential cost of a rescue could be $25 billion. CBO said there is probably a better than 50% chance that Treasury would not need to step in. It also said there is a 5% chance that Freddie's and Fannie's losses could cost the government $100 billion. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Feds cracks down on mortgage fraud - Jul. 30, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- While Congress and the Bush administration are focusing on bailing out struggling homeowners and financial companies, another group of federal officials are going after the people who helped propel the country into the mortgage crisis.


The FBI's Mortgage Fraud Task Force, which works with federal, state and local law enforcement officials across the United States, has ramped up its work. Its targets: mortgage brokers, lenders, appraisers and professionals who defraud homeowners and bankers.


A federal grand jury is looking into three large players in the housing market - Countrywide Financial, IndyMac and New Century Financial - the Los Angeles Times reported last week. All three succumbed to the mortgage meltdown. The paper said that investigators are also looking into whether Countrywide founder Angelo Mozilo gave mortgage deals to powerful friends and politicians, including members of Congress.


In recent weeks, law enforcement officials have descended on those suspected of fraud. This month alone, mortgage professionals in Maryland, Florida, Washington and elsewhere have been charged with bilking lenders and homeowners out of millions of dollars.


These charges come on the heels of the U.S. Justice Department's roundup of more than 400 people - accused of inflicting more than $1 billion in losses - who were caught up in the latest nationwide sweep named Operation Malicious Mortgage.


"Mortgage fraud and related securities fraud pose a significant threat to our economy, to the stability of our nation's housing market and to the peace of mind of millions of American homeowners," Deputy Attorney General Mark Filip said in June.


Mortgage pros involved in most fraud

Mortgage schemes come in many flavors, but the most common by far are conducted by industry insiders. Some 80% of all fraud losses involve collaboration or collusion by professionals, which is known as "fraud for profit," according to the FBI.


Often the schemes involve inflated appraisals, falsified documents and fake buyers. The crooks take as much equity as they can out of a house before they stop making mortgage payments, usually leaving the lender stuck with the property.


In Las Vegas earlier this month, five people pleaded guilty in a scheme that cost banks $17 million. They were involved in recruiting people to pose as homebuyers, falsifying loan applications and then defaulting on mortgages. Six more people are awaiting trial in the case.


In other schemes, professionals steal people's identities and credit histories to qualify for loans. Sometimes, the sham involves flipping a house from buyer to buyer, inflating its value, before abandoning it.


In some cases, industry insiders claim to help delinquent borrowers save their homes from foreclosure, but actually take the title of the home, strip out the equity and then desert it.


In mid-July, law enforcement officials charged a 36-year-old Maryland man with defrauding homeowners facing foreclosure. In the case, the man conspired with the owners and employees of the Metropolitan Money Store to dupe struggling borrowers, telling them they could keep their homes and repair their credit if they turned over the title of their houses. Instead, the FBI charges, they stripped the homes of their equity and let them fall into foreclosure. Nine defendants face a variety of charges, including mail fraud, wire fraud and money laundering. He is looking at a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison and $1 million fine.


The other type of fraud, known as "fraud for housing," involves a borrower falsifying his income or employment to qualify for the loan.


While acknowledging that the feds can't turn a blind eye to mortgage fraud, industry observers question how effective their efforts will be at stemming such crimes. Some say the problem is just too widespread, while others maintain the key to stopping mortgage fraud lies in closer monitoring of the lenders and other professionals.


"The deterrent will come through better regulation and underwriting standards," said Todd Foster, a former federal prosecutor and FBI agent who is now a defense attorney in Tampa. "I'm not sure these prosecutions will have as great an effect as that."


Fraud reports soar with home prices

Law enforcement agencies started ramping up their investigations into mortgage fraud earlier this decade after seeing a spike in banks filing reports of suspected criminal activity. In 2004, they formed a mortgage fraud task force with local and state officials and, within 16 months, had charged more than 300 people with crimes ranging from doctoring loan documents to inflating property appraisals.


There are now 42 regional mortgage fraud task forces nationwide charged with rooting out criminal activity in the housing market, with many of them created after the sector starting imploding last year. One of the most recent was a squad in Southern California, a hotspot for mortgage schemes, which was assembled in June.


"We don't know the depth of the problem," said Sharon Ormsby, the FBI's section chief of financial crimes. "We are trying to be diligent and target those subjects who will do their communities the most harm."


The FBI has 180 agents devoted to the sector. They are juggling more than 1,400 investigations, double the caseload it had three years ago. It is also probing 22 corporations for subprime-related schemes.


Law enforcement officials have been busy in recent months. In the first four months of the year, the FBI obtained 189 indictments and 122 convictions, on top of 321 indictments and 260 convictions last year. The top markets for mortgage fraud include Florida, Georgia, Michigan, California and Illinois.


The housing market's collapse doesn't spell the end of mortgage fraud, Ormsby said. Foreclosure scams will likely increase, for instance.


"The market, whether up or down, doesn't affect fraud," she said. Nowadays, the criminals "just need to be more creative."


Clamping down on mortgage fraud is tough, says Patricia McCoy, law professor at the University of Connecticut. Since the players are often small, law enforcement has to go after "many small fish in many different towns" nationwide, she said.


While many blame the regulators for being too lax during the housing boom, McCoy said officials could have ramped up their efforts earlier too. It might have encouraged lenders to increase their oversight.


"If the FBI had been much more serious about mortgage fraud, they might have gotten the lenders to be serious about taking fraud prevention measures, she said. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Monday, July 28, 2008

Home prices drop record 16% - Jul. 29, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- May home prices dropped a record 15.8% from a year ago, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index of 20 cities. It was the 22nd consecutive month of decline recorded by the index. Prices fell 0.9% from April to May.


Each of the 20 metro areas covered by the index posted annual declines; nine posted record lows and 10 cities recorded double-digit drops.


The Case-Shiller 10-city Index posted a year over year decline of 16.9%, and a 1% month over month dip. Both the 10-City Composite Index and the 20-City Composite Index are reporting record annual declines.


"Since August 2006, there has not been one month where we have seen overall price increases, as measured by the two Composites," said David Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor's.


Case-Shiller has been tracking the 20-city index for 19 years, while the 10-city index is 21 years old. The current price decline streak has been unprecedented in both length and depth. Starting in April 1990, the 10-city index streaked down for 10 consecutive months. But that total loss was just 6.5%.


Since the 10-city index peaked in July 2006, it has plunged 19.8%. The 20-city is down 18.4%.


The 20-city index's Sun Belt cities, which recorded the biggest price gains during the boom, have led the charge down. Las Vegas prices have plummeted 28.4% during the past 12 months; Miami prices fell 28.3%; and Phoenix homes lost 26.5% of their value.


Midwest metro areas, which have endured tough economic times for years, are also feeling the pain. Detroit prices are off 17.4% for the 12 months, and Cleveland is down 8%.


Northeast cities like Boston, down 6.2% for the 12 months, and New York, off 7.9%, have been less volatile than the Sun Belt.


The smallest year-over-year declines were recorded by Charlotte, N.C. (down 0.2%), Dallas (down 3.1%), and Denver (down 4.8%).


Optimistic observers might point out that price declines appear to be slowing. The 10-city index's 1% month to month dip in May was less than April's, when it registered a 1.5% decline, while the 20-city index fell just 0.9% in May after dropping 1.3% in April.  


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Sunday, July 27, 2008

Paulson, banks join forces on covered bonds - Jul. 28, 2008





NEW YORK�(Fortune) -- The government is reaching across the Atlantic in its latest bid to revive the U.S. housing market.


On Monday, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson laid out guidelines for banks seeking to issue so-called covered bonds as a way to finance home mortgages. Four big U.S. lenders - Citi (C, Fortune 500), Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500), JPMorgan Chase (JPM, Fortune 500) and Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) - said they support the venture.


By issuing covered bonds, a bank borrows money from investors, using assets on its balance sheet - such as home mortgage loans - as collateral. Until now, covered bonds haven't been issued in the U.S., though the concept has long been in use in Europe.


But with the housing bust threatening to push the economy into recession - the International Monetary Fund warned Monday that "a bottom for the housing market is not visible" - policymakers and financial institutions have been trying out new ideas in hopes of making mortgages more available, while breaking the cycle of falling house prices and rising foreclosures.


"I believe covered bonds have the potential to increase mortgage financing, improve underwriting standards, and strengthen U.S. financial institutions by providing a new funding source that will diversify their overall portfolio," Paulson said. The efforts of the big banks would "kick-start" the development of the U.S. covered bond market, he added.


"We believe a robust U.S. covered bond market would provide an additional stable and cost-effective funding source for banks to originate and hold mortgages on their balance sheet," the banks said in a joint statement. "We look forward to being leading issuers as the U.S. covered bond market develops, with programs consistent with the FDIC and Treasury statements."


The move comes as shares of banks and brokerage stocks posted their latest sharp decline and investors fret over the fallout of falling house prices on the health of financial institutions. While the Federal Reserve has slashed short-term interest rates over the past year, partly in response to the sharp decline of house prices, mortgage rates recently soared to highs last seen at the turn of the century.


Banks in Europe have used covered bonds as a primary source of mortgage finance for many years, and the market for covered bonds is worth more than $3 trillion.


Until recently, American lenders have preferred to sell their mortgage loans to investors as securities, in the process known as securitization. But when loans to borrowers with poor credit histories started souring at unusually rapid rates last summer, investors fled the market for mortgage-backed securities - a trend that marked the beginning of a credit crisis that has choked off lending in the housing market and, increasingly, elsewhere in the economy.


Monday's move comes on the heels of the Senate's approval of a bill that gives the Treasury the authority to buy shares in two struggling U.S. mortgage firms: Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500). Fannie and Freddie are the biggest providers of mortgage finance in the nation, through their guarantee of mortgage-backed securities issued by others and the purchase of mortgages for their portfolios.


With U.S. house prices having plunged at a double-digit percentage rate over the past year, fears have arisen on Wall Street that Fannie and Freddie will face losses that will eat through their thin capital cushions. At the end of last quarter, Freddie held some $800 billion in mortgage loans and other assets against shareholder equity - a measure of net worth - of just $16 billion.


Paulson said in a speech before the Federal Insurance Deposit Corp. earlier this month that the use of covered bonds might be one way to "increase the availability and lower the cost of mortgage financing to accelerate the return of normal homebuying activity."


Still, while Europe's covered bond market is certainly large, it's no stranger to the fears that have shaken other debt markets around the world. The yield on covered bonds sold in Europe by the two U.S. banks that have sold the bonds - Washington Mutual (WM, Fortune 500) and Bank of America - have soared since those offerings were made in 2006, Bloomberg reports.


Paulson said he sees the expansion of covered bond sales into the U.S. as just one part of the government's effort to bolster market confidence. "There is no silver bullet here," Paulson said Monday.  




See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Friday, July 25, 2008

How the housing rescue bill can help you - Jul. 26, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The Senate on Saturday passed a $300 billion housing rescue bill aimed at helping troubled homeowners avoid foreclosure and supporting mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


President Bush is likely to sign the bill into law within days. After the law kicks in on Oct. 1, thousands of at-risk borrowers will be able to refinance their unaffordable old mortgages into new low-cost fixed-rate loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA).


The Congressional Budget Office estimates that 400,000 borrowers with $68 billion in loans may benefit from the program - but the bill allows for as many as 1 million or 2 million borrowers to participate in the program.


Here's what homeowners need to know.


Who's eligible?

Qualified borrowers must live in their homes and have loans that were issued between January 2005 and June 2007. Additionally, they must be spending at least 31% of their gross monthly income on mortgage debt to be eligible for the program.


They can be up to date on their existing mortgage or in default, but either way borrowers must prove that they will not be able to keep paying their existing mortgage - and attest that they are not deliberately defaulting just to obtain lower payments.


Before homeowners can get FHA-backed mortgages, they must first retire any other debt on the home, such as a home equity loan or line of credit. Borrowers are not permitted to take out another home equity loan for at least five years, unless it's to pay for necessary upkeep on the home.


To get a new home equity loan, borrowers will need approval from the FHA, and total debt cannot exceed 95% of the home's appraised value at the time.


How can I apply?

Borrowers can contact their current mortgage servicer or go directly to an FHA-approved lender for help. These lenders can be found on the Web site of the Department of Housing and Urban Development.


How does the refinancing process work?

This is a voluntary program, so lenders holding the original mortgage have to agree to rework a given loan before things can get started. The bill requires lenders to make major concessions, writing down the value of the loan to 90% of the home's current value. In areas where prices have plummeted by as much as 20%, that will mean a substantial loss for the lender.


But lenders won't sign off on a workout unless they think that they'll lose less money on that than they would by allowing a home to go through the costly foreclosure process.


Each loan will have to be underwritten by an FHA lender on a case-by-case basis. That means the banks will do a new appraisal to determine the home's current value, as well as examine and verify income statements, bank accounts, job histories and credit scores.


Based on that new appraised home value, the FHA lender must determine how much the original lender has to reduce the original mortgage, so that it will reflect 90% of the home's market value.


If the original lender agrees to the writedown, the new lender buys the old loan and takes over the reworked mortgage.


As part of the deal, the old lender writes off any fees and penalties on the original mortgage, including prepayment penalties, and accepts the proceeds from the new loan on a paid-in-full basis. Additionally, it pays the FHA an up-front premium equal to 3% of the mortgage principal.


What does it cost?

There should be little up-front costs for borrowers to bear. Loan origination fees will vary by lender, but these can usually be paid by the borrower over the life of the loan in the form of a slightly higher interest rate.


However, the refinanced loans do come with many strings. For one thing, borrowers are responsible for paying an insurance premium to the FHA guaranteeing the loan, which will be 1.5% of the principal annually.


Borrowers also agree to share any profits from future home-price appreciation with the FHA. To do that, they'll pay a "3% exit fee" of the mortgage principal to the FHA when they resell or refinance.


Plus, they'll agree to pay the FHA 100% of any profits they realize from higher home prices if they sell or refinance within a year. So if the original loan principal is $200,000 and the home sells for $250,000, the borrower will owe the FHA $50,000, minus costs.


After a year, borrowers will share 90% of the profits with the FHA. The percentage keeps dropping in 10% increments to 50% after the fifth year, where it stays.


What will I save?

Savings depend on what borrowers are paying for their present loan and where they live, but for most people it will be substantial, even after factoring in the FHA fees.


In areas that have sustained huge price drops, such as Sacramento, Calif., where prices have fallen by about 30% over the past year, some loans might be reduced by more than 40%.


Additionally, the FHA loans carry reasonable interest rates, which are fixed for the life of the loan, as opposed to a subprime adjustable-rate mortgage that can jump higher every six months. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Senate poised to pass housing rescue package - Jul. 26, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- In a rare weekend session, the Senate on Saturday is expected to pass a landmark housing bill that will offer up to $300 billion in loans for troubled homeowners and establish a government rescue plan for mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


The House passed the bill on Wednesday just hours after President Bush reversed his long-standing vow to veto the bill.


Once the package clears the Senate, it will be sent to President Bush, who is likely to sign it soon.


The legislation, one of the most far-reaching housing bills from Congress in decades, marks the centerpiece of Washington's efforts to address the nation's housing meltdown.


"This will begin to lay the groundwork for a turnaround in the housing market and hopefully in the broader economy as well," said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., chairman of the House Financial Services Committee and a principal author of the bill.


The bill has two principal objectives: to offer affordable government-backed mortgages to homeowners at risk of foreclosure, and to bolster Fannie and Freddie with a temporary rescue plan and a new, more stringent regulator.


Helping at-risk borrowers

Provisions in the 700-page bill that would most directly affect consumers and communities include:


Increase the Federal Housing Administration's role. The FHA will be allowed to insure up to $300 billion in new 30-year fixed-rate mortgages for at-risk borrowers in owner-occupied homes if their lenders agree to write down loan balances to 90% of the homes' current appraised value.


The cost of the new FHA program - which would begin on Oct. 1 and be in place for just a few years - would be funded by fees from Fannie and Freddie, along with fees paid by both lenders and borrowers.


Establish a stronger regulator for the GSEs. The new regulator will have a greater say over how well funded the agencies are - a major concern in the markets that has sent stocks in both companies plunging.


Permanently increase "conforming loan" limits. The bill would permanently increase the cap on the size of mortgages guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie to a maximum of $625,500 from $417,000.


The FHA maximum loan limits for high-cost areas would also increase to $625,500. Higher loan limits will make it easier for borrowers to get mortgages, because they're more likely to be traded if they are considered conforming.


Create home-buyer credit. The bill includes a tax refund for first-time home buyers worth up to 10% of a home's purchase price but no more than $7,500.


The refund, however, serves more as an interest-free loan, since it would have to be paid back over 15 years in equal installments.


Bar down-payment assistance for FHA loans. The bill eliminates a program that has allowed sellers to provide down payment assistance.


The bill would also increase to 3.5% from 3% the down payment requirement for borrowers getting FHA loans.


Create an affordable housing trust fund. The bill establishes a permanent fund to promote affordable housing. The fund would be paid for by fees from Fannie and Freddie.


Give grants to states to buy foreclosed properties. The bill would grant $4 billion to states to buy up and rehabilitate foreclosed properties. The funding had been opposed by the White House, which said it would benefit lenders and not homeowners.


Bolster Fannie and Freddie

Concerns over whether Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) will have enough money to weather future losses in the housing market sent shares plummeting in recent weeks. Since the beginning of June, Fannie's stock price has dropped 57% and Freddie's plummeted 66%. For the past year, they're both down roughly 85% as of the end of trade on Friday.


To help stabilize markets, Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson asked Congress to temporarily empower Treasury to offer the companies a backstop if needed. Consequently the housing bill now includes provisions that let Treasury over the next 18 months offer Fannie and Freddie an unlimited line of credit and the authority to buy stock in the companies.


Both critics and supporters of the Paulson plan have expressed concern that loaning or investing money in the companies could leave taxpayers with a fat bill to pay.


The Congressional Budget Office on Tuesday estimated the potential cost of a rescue could be $25 billion. CBO said there is probably a better than 50% chance that Treasury would not need to step in. It also said there is a 5% chance that Freddie's and Fannie's losses could cost the government $100 billion. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Thursday, July 24, 2008

New home sales' annual rate well above forecasts - Jul. 25, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- New home sales fell in June, the government said Friday, but the annual rate was stronger than economists expected.


The Census Bureau reported Friday that June sales of new single-family homes came in at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 530,000, down 0.6% from May's revised reading of 533,000.


That revision was significant; the original May reading was 512,000.


The June figure was much higher than the economists' consensus forecast of 505,000, as compiled by Briefing.com.


Sales have declined 33.2% from the year-earlier rate of 793,000, the government said.


The median sales price of new houses sold in June 2008 was $230,900, which is 1.4% higher than the revised median sales price of $227,700 from a month ago, but still 2% lower from the median house price of $235,500 from a year ago.


The average sale price for June was $298,600, which was $300, or 0.1%, lower than the revised average sales price of $298,900 in May. Compared with a year earlier, the average sale price has fallen 2.6% from $306,500.


The seasonally adjusted estimate of new homes for sale at the end of June was 426,000, which represented a 10-month supply of housing inventory at the current sales rate.


That was 3.8% smaller than the revised 10.4-month supply of housing inventory in May. The inventory of new homes available for sale was 20.5% higher than the 8.3-month supply of housing inventory reported in June 2007.


The National Association of Realtors reported Thursday that sales of existing slowed more than expected last month to their lowest level in 10 years. Sales by homeowners dipped to an annual pace of 4.86 million, down 2.6% from a pace of 4.99 million in May. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Servicers get Washington grilling - Jul. 25, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A key House committee was set to grill home lenders and housing advocates on Friday about mortgage industry efforts to work out affordable loans for troubled homeowners.


The House Financial Services Committee plans to hear from executives at two big lenders: Michael Gross of Bank of America Corp. (BAC, Fortune 500) and Mary Coffin of Wells Fargo & Co. (WFC, Fortune 500) Also testifying is Faith Schwartz, the executive director of Hope Now, an industry alliance of lenders, loan servicers and housing counselors.


The House Financial Services Committee is chaired by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., who has led the House's legislative response to the housing crisis. On Wednesday, the House passed sweeping legislation that will offer up to $300 billion in assistance to troubled homeowners and throw government support behind mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500). The Senate is expected to vote on the bill on Saturday.


"Reducing foreclosure is an essential matter of justice and an essential matter [for the economy as well]," Frank said in his opening remarks.


He also urged lenders and loan servicers - the middlemen that administer and collect payments on the loans - to inform the committee of any barriers to their foreclosure prevention efforts that still exist after the bill takes effect in October.


"There are no silver bullets," he said. "I'm not the Lone Ranger. If there are obstacles, tell us. And we will do the best we can to remove those obstacles."


A pledge to help

Bank of America's Gross said in prepared testimony that the bank will modify and work out at least $40 billion in mortgages by the end of 2009, helping about 250,000 troubled homeowners.


"We know that consumers who are experiencing financial challenges, but who ultimately have the ability to repay their loans, often need our help to stay in their homes," Gross said. "We are ready to help them. We do so because no one benefits from a foreclosed home."


Many critics of the mortgage industry have charged that lenders and loan servicers are dragging their feet when it comes to helping at-risk mortgage borrowers.


But David Kittle, chairman-elect of the Mortgage Bankers Association, said that wouldn't be in their best interest. "It makes good economic sense for mortgage servicers to help borrowers who are in trouble," he said. "Foreclosure is a lengthy and extremely costly process for the industry and, generally, a losing financial proposition. Several independent studies have found the losses to be quite significant: over $50,000 per foreclosed home or as much as 30 to 60 percent of the outstanding loan balance."


Still, foreclosures are growing at a faster rate than mortgage workouts, according to the most recent data from Hope Now. Meanwhile the housing crisis continues to deepen.


Home prices have plunged 15% nationwide over the past 12 months, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index. More than 340,000 borrowers have lost their homes to foreclosure during the first six months of the year, up 136% compared with the same period in 2007. The number of homeowners in default during the same period rose to 1.4 million, up 56% from a year earlier.


The housing rescue bill should help to break the cycle, and lenders and loan servicers are promising to do more to keep borrowers in their homes.


Servicers step up

"Since last fall, we have been working aggressively to address these problems," Hope Now CEO Faith Schwartz said in prepared testimony. "The goal of Hope Now is to keep more people in their homes"


Hope Now has recently announced new guidelines that were intended to speed up the mortgage modification process and keep borrowers better informed of its progress.


Loan servicers have pledged to respond to a borrower's request for a workout within five days, and come to a decision on the modification within 45 days.


Hope Now also promised to improve the way it reports the number of people it has helped. Critics, such as FDIC chief Sheila Bair, would like to see much more detail about what kind of mortgage workouts Hope Now members are arranging. Right now, it reports workouts only under very broad categories.


"This is a serious committed effort that will continue until problems in the housing and mortgages market abate," Schwartz said in prepared testimony. "It is neither a silver bullet nor a magic solution, but this effort will continue to compliment the efforts of legislators and regulators as we work through the housing issues."  


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Servicers get Washington grilling - Jul. 25, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A key House committee was set to grill home lenders and housing advocates on Friday about mortgage industry efforts to work out affordable loans for troubled homeowners.


The House Financial Services Committee plans to hear from Michael Gross, who is Bank of America's (BOA) managing director for loss mitigation, mortgage, home equity and insurance services, Mary Coffin, Wells Fargo (WFC, Fortune 500) Home Mortgage's executive vice-president, as well as Faith Schwartz, the executive director of Hope Now, an industry alliance of lenders, loan servicers and housing counselors.


The House Financial Services Committee chaired by Rep. Barney Frank (D-Mass.), who has led the House's legislative response to the housing crisis. On Wednesday, the House passed sweeping legislation that will offer up to $300 billion in assistance to troubled homeowners and throw government support behind mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500). The Senate is expected to vote on the bill on Saturday.


Bank of America's Michael Gross is expected to pledge that the lender will modify and work out at least $40 billion in mortgages by the end of 2009, helping about 250,000 troubled homeowners.


"We know that consumers who are experiencing financial challenges, but who ultimately have the ability to repay their loans, often need our help to stay in their homes," Gross said in prepared testimony. "We are ready to help them. We do so because no one benefits from a foreclosed home."


Many critics of the mortgage industry have charged that lenders and loan servicers are dragging their feet when it comes to helping at-risk mortgage borrowers.


Foreclosures are growing at a faster rate than mortgage workouts, according to the most recent data from Hope Now. Meanwhile the housing crisis continues to deepen.


Home prices have plunged 15% nationwide over the past 12 months, according to the S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Index. More than 340,000 borrowers have lost their homes to foreclosure during the first six months of the year, up 136% compared with the same period in 2007. The number of homeowners in default during the same period rose to 1.4 million, up 56% from a year earlier.


The housing rescue bill should help to break the cycle, and lenders and loan servicers are promising to do more to keep borrowers in their homes.


"Since last fall, we have been working aggressively to address these problems," Hope Now CEO Faith Schwartz said in prepared testimony. "The goal of Hope Now is to keep more people in their homes"


Hope Now has recently announced new guideline that were intended to speed up the mortgage modification process and keep borrowers better informed on its progress.


Loan servicers have pledged to respond to a borrower's request for a workout within five days, and come to a decision on the modification within 45 days.


Hope Now also promised to improve the way it reports the number of people it has helped. Critics, such as FDIC chief Sheila Bair, would like to see much more detail about what kind of mortgage workouts Hope Now members are arranging. Right now, it reports workouts only under very broad categories.


"This is a serious committed effort that will continue until problems in the housing and mortgages market abate," Schwartz said in prepared testimony. "It is neither a silver bullet nor a magic solution, but this effort will continue to compliment the efforts of legislators and regulators as we work through the housing issues."  


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


More foreclosure gloom - Jul. 25, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Foreclosures continue to soar, with 220,000 homes lost to bank repossessions in the second quarter of this year, according to the latest statistics from RealtyTrac, an online marketer of foreclosed homes. That's nearly triple the number from the same period in 2007.


There were a total of 739,714 foreclosure filings recorded during that three month period, up 14% from the first quarter, and up a whopping 121% from the same period in 2007. That means that out of every 171 U.S. households received a filing, which include notices of default, auction sale notices and bank repossessions.


"Most areas of the country are seeing at least some increase in foreclosure activity," said RealtyTrac CEO James Saccadic. "Forty-eight of 50 states and 95 out of the nation's 100 largest metro areas experienced year-over-year increases in foreclosure activity."


Because foreclosure filings are growing so quickly, RealtyTrac will have to reevaluate its foreclosure forecast for the year, according to spokesman Rick Sharga.


"We've been saying foreclosures will total 1.9 million to 2 million this year," he said. "But midway through the year, we're already at 1.4 million so we're going to be raising our projections."


And there is more bad news: Bank repossessions are up as a proportion of total filings, representing 30% of the notices issued during the quarter, up from 24% a year ago.


"I don't think that's a surprise if you look at the general conditions out there," said Brian Bethune, chief financial economist for Global Insight. "There have been six straight moves of weaker employment this year. The ongoing problems in the housing market are compounded by a generally weaker economy. Foreclosures won't go down until we start to see employment move up again."


Sun Belt front and center

California's Central Valley remains ground zero for foreclosure filings. Stockton, which is just east of San Francisco, had the highest rate of foreclosure filings of any metro area, one for every 25 homes. That's seven times the national average.


Riverside/San Bernardino, which is east of Los Angeles, had the second highest rate in the nation with one filing for every 32 households. Las Vegas, Bakersfield and Sacramento rounded out the top five.


Detroit continued to suffer more than any other non-Sun Belt area, with one filing for every 66 households. And several Ohio cities were also hard hit, led by Toledo (one in 92 households), Akron (one in 93) and Cleveland (one in 108).


On the other hand, there were a handful of metro areas that remained relatively unscathed. Honolulu, at one filing for every 1,331 households had the lowest rate of all, followed by Allentown, Penn. (one for every 972) and Syracuse, NY (one for every 880).


At the state level, Nevada had the highest rate with one filing for every 43 households, while California had the highest total number of filings - 202,599.


The report came as more negative news for the housing market this week. On Thursday, a report form the National Association of Realtors revealed that existing home sales had declined again as the number of homes for sale continued to rise. On Tuesday, a government agency reported home prices registered another drop in May.


All this is happening as Congress struggles to pass a housing rescue bill that will make FHA-insured loans available to many at-risk borrowers. That bill, even if signed this week, will not take effect until October.


One of the sponsors of the bill, Barney Frank (D -- Mass.), released a statement on Thursday in which he encourages lenders and mortgage servicers to delay taking action against delinquent borrowers before the new law takes effect.


"I am urging the mortgage servicers to hold off on foreclosures in applicable cases," he said, "so borrowers can take advantage of the program." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Wednesday, July 23, 2008

Homeowners close equity spigot - Jul. 24, 2008


NEW YORK (AP) -- The amount of money Americans pulled out of their homes is at a four-year low as homeowners battle falling home values and stricter standards among lenders, Freddie Mac said Thursday.


Homeowners "cashed out" about $68 billion in home equity during the first half of the year, the lowest since the first six months of 2004, according to the McLean, Va.-based mortgage finance company.


About $38 billion in home equity was cashed out through refinancing of loans made to prime borrowers in the second quarter - less than half the $79 billion cashed out during the same period last year, said Amy Crews Cutts, Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) deputy chief economist.


In the second quarter, 66% of homeowners who refinanced loans purchased by Freddie Mac "cashed out" at least 5% of their equity.


Tapping home equity allows homeowners to get cash out of their homes. And economists watch that number closely because it affects consumer spending and investment decisions.


Consumer spending, which accounts for two-thirds of total economic activity, remains under severe strains, as the housing market downturn, combined with rising food and gasoline costs, have hurt consumer confidence. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Grand jury investigates subprime lenders - Jul. 24, 2008


LOS ANGELES (AP) -- A federal grand jury is investigating subprime mortgage lenders Countrywide Financial Corp., New Century Financial Corp. and IndyMac Federal Bank, a person familiar with the situation told The Associated Press on Thursday.


Subpoenas seeking documents have been issued to all three companies, according to the person, who was not authorized to speak publicly about the case and requested anonymity.


The subpoenas are seeking e-mails, phone bills, financial records and other information, according to the Los Angeles Times, which cited people with direct knowledge of the subpoenas in first reporting the investigation was under way.


The grand jury investigation is the clearest sign yet that prosecutors are investigating whether fraud and other crimes might have contributed to the mortgage crisis that led to the demise of all three California-based lenders.


The Times also said investigators have begun looking at whether Countrywide and its former chairman, Angelo Mozilo, gave mortgage breaks to influential friends, including members of Congress.


Countrywide (CFC, Fortune 500) had been the nation's largest originator and servicer of home loans. Its business included subprime loans, many of which went to people with poor credit histories.


California, Illinois and the city of San Diego are suing the company over its lending practices.


Bank of America Corp. (BAC, Fortune 500) bought Countrywide in a deal approved by the lender's shareholders late last month. Scott Silvestri, a spokesman for Bank of America, did not immediately return a call from the AP seeking comment.


New Century (NEWCQ) had been the second-largest originator of subprime loans in the country before seeking Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in April 2007. Subprime loans are those made to borrowers with poor credit repayment records.


Federal regulators seized IndyMac's (IDMC) assets on July 11. The bank is the largest regulated thrift in the nation to fail, regulators said.


The FBI told The Associated Press last week that it is investigating IndyMac. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Mortgage rates rise again - Jul. 24, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Rates on 30-year mortgages rose for the third consecutive week amid concerns about mounting inflation, the weak housing market and speculation that the Federal Reserve will hike interest rates soon.


Mortgage finance firm Freddie Mac reported Thursday that 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.63% this week. That's up from 6.26% last week but still below the 6.69% average a year ago.


Thursday's average marked the eighth week that rates have been above 6%.


"Market concerns about rising inflation, further weakness in the housing market and greater probability that the Federal Reserve will raise short-term rates this year all combined to push mortgage rates higher this week," said Freddie Mac chief economist Frank Nothaft in a statement.


The ongoing downturn in the housing market was highlighted Thursday by a separate report that showed sales of existing homes fell more than expected last month.


The National Association of Realtors reported that sales by homeowners dipped in June to an annual pace of 4.86 million, down 2.6% from May. Analysts were expecting NAR to report a sales pace of 4.95 million, according to estimates compiled by Briefing.com.


The report also showed that the median price of a home sold during the month fell to $215,100, down 6.1% from $229,000 a year earlier, as the housing market continues to work through a glut of inventory.


In response to the nation's housing woes, the House passed sweeping legislation on Wednesday that will offer up to $300 billion in assistance to troubled homeowners and throw government support behind mortgage finance giants Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500).


In addition to housing market concerns, rising inflation rates also helped push mortgage rates higher this week.


"Some of the key drivers to these concerns were consumer prices jumping 1.1% in June - the largest increase since September 2005 on a year-over-year basis - coupled with consumer prices growing at a 5% clip - the strongest since February 1991," Nothaft said.


Many analysts think mounting inflation may cause the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates at its September meeting.


Other types of mortgages also showed rate increases this week, according to the Freddie Mac survey.


Rates on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages rose to 6.18%, up from 5.78% last week.


The five-year adjustable-rate mortgage rose to 6.16%, up from 5.80% last week.


The rate on a one-year adjustable-rate mortgage rose to 5.49%, compared to 5.10% last week. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]