Monday, June 30, 2008

Bush says housing deal possible - Jul. 1, 2008


NORTH LITTLE ROCK, Ark. (AP) -- President Bush expressed confidence Tuesday that he will reach a deal with Congress on a housing-rescue plan, but prodded lawmakers to show "less politics."


The president's comments came as many homeowners, saddled with mortgage payments they can no longer afford, are facing foreclosure. The Senate is considering a $300 billion plan to back cheaper loans for people who risk losing their homes, but that measure has stalled for now.


"I think we can get us a bill," Bush said. "But it's going to require less politics and more focus."


He spoke at a credit-counseling agency in Arkansas that helps people saddled with debt.


Senate leaders hope to get back to the bill soon after their weeklong break. The legislation has been snagged over an unrelated dispute about tax breaks and renewable energy.


The bill includes elements Bush supports, including an overhaul of the Federal Housing Administration. But the White House opposes parts of the rescue plan, too.


President upbeat on economy

Bush also sounded an upbeat tone about the slumping economy.


"I'm confident in the long run, America is going to be just fine," he said.


The economy has been battered by housing, credit and financial problems. Consumers responded in the first quarter by spending at the weakest pace since the 2001 recession.


The combination of weak housing sales, falling home values, tighter lending and the weak economy has forced many strapped homeowners into foreclosure. Many can't find buyers, or they owe more than their home is worth and can't get refinanced into an affordable loan.


Nationwide, 261,255 homes received at least one foreclosure-related filing in May - up 48% from a year ago, according to foreclosure listing service RealtyTrac Inc.


Bush made his quick stop at the nonprofit housing agency in between two fundraisers. Ultimately, taxpayers end up paying most of the bill for any political travel by the president.


In Mississippi, Bush led a closed fundraiser for Sen. Roger Wicker, the former congressman who was appointed to Trent Lott's vacated seat. Wicker is competing in a Nov. 4 election against Democrat Ronnie Musgrove to fill the remaining four years of Lott's term.


Wicker's campaign manager, Austin Barbour, said no fundraising totals were available for the Mississippi event. But with roughly 500 people attending the $1,000-per-ticket luncheon, the amount raised was expected to be at least $500,000 for Wicker and other state Republicans.


Wicker was among the Republicans who bucked Bush in this election year by voting for the farm bill. The president said the massive $290 billion bill was bloated with spending, including farmer subsidies. He vetoed the measure, but Congress overrode him.


In Little Rock, Ark., Bush also led a private fundraiser for the Arkansas Republican Party. Tickets were $150; a photo-op package with Bush cost $5,000.


The state's Republicans are trying to rebound from a string of losses at the state level.


Bush - still a fundraising presence despite low national popularity - carried Mississippi and Arkansas in both of his presidential races. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Sunday, June 29, 2008

Florida attorney general sues Countrywide - Jun. 30, 2008


TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) -- Countrywide Financial Corp., the nation's largest mortgage lender, was sued Monday by Florida Attorney General Bill McCollum for misleading and unfair trade practices.


The 12-page suit also named Countrywide Chief Executive Angelo R. Mozilo as a defendant. The California-based lender did not immediately return a call for comment on the suit.


"It appears to us Countrywide did no due diligence and accepted applications which were patently fraudulent and reflected no ability on the part of the borrowers to make the required payments," said Marc Taps with Legal Services of North Florida. "The most financially unsophisticated segment of the population was targeted by the brokers who knew Countrywide would write these mortgages."


The complaint, filed in the 17th Judicial Circuit in Broward County, claims Countrywide hid the potential negative effects of its so-called "teaser" loans, including increased interest rates and prepayment penalties.


"It is unthinkable a company would try to take advantage of someone's dream of home ownership," said McCollum, who plans a Tuesday news conference to detail the allegations against the California-based lending giant.


Illinois and California sued Countrywide last week, also accusing the company of persuading homeowners to apply for risky mortgages far beyond their means.


Washington Gov. Chris Gregoire has accused Countrywide of cheating the state out of $5 million by underreporting assessments, and she plans to seek restitution.


Countrywide (CFC, Fortune 500) is in the process of being sold to Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500). The Charlotte-based bank expects to close the deal this week, having received the go-ahead from Countrywide shareholders last week. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Wachovia quits offering risky mortgage loan - Jun. 30, 2008


CHARLOTTE, N.C. (AP) -- Beleaguered consumer bank Wachovia Corp. said Monday it will quit offering a mortgage payment option that allows borrowers to pay less each month than the bank charges in interest.


The choice to pay less was one of the options of Wachovia's controversial Pick-A-Payment mortgages, which offer customers four different payment options each month. Wachovia (WB, Fortune 500) told The Associated Press that it will no longer offer the less-than-full interest payment option on all new home loans.


Critics have said paying less than the amount of interest charged can lead to negative amortization. That means the borrower owes more than the value of their home, increasing the chance of foreclosure.


"I think in a difficult time, a lot of people are looking to find ways to avoid foreclosure and we want to make sure our customers have the right products to meet their needs," said Wachovia spokesman Don Vecchiarello.


The move is a major pullback for the nation's fourth-largest bank, which started offering the loan after it purchased California-based mortgage specialist Golden West Financial Corp. in 2006. The portfolio of Pick-A-Payment loans is currently worth $120 billion.


Wachovia said it plans to continue offering a loan with three different payment options for customers: one for the full amount of interest accrued, and payments of principal and interest on a 15 and 30-year repayment schedule. Whether the bank retains the "Pick-A-Payment" name, has yet to be determined, Vecchiarello said.


"They are taking the riskiest component out, as they should," said Tony Plath, an associate professor of finance at the University of North Carolina at Charlotte. "There is no one in this market that should be in a loan like that, not right now."


Like many of the nation's leading financial institutions, Wachovia has been hit hard by a widespread slump in the nation's housing market and ongoing credit crunch. The bank forced out Chief Executive Ken Thompson amid rising loan losses and a series of miscues, including the decision to buy Golden West for roughly $25 billion at the height of the nation's housing boom.


The bank's battered stock tumbled further Monday, falling 82 cents to $15.40 in afternoon trading. Wachovia shares fell as low as $14.70, a 16-year low, earlier in the day.


In April, before Wachovia slashed its dividend 41% and reported what was to become a $707 million first-quarter loss, the bank said it would revise the underwriting policies in its mortgage loan business - a step that could make it harder to take out a loan at the bank.


The bank had said earlier that month it was considering halting Pick-A-Payment mortgage loans in 17 California counties that have been hit hard by falling home prices and rising foreclosures.


Last week, Wachovia said it has hired Wall Street Investment firm Goldman Sachs Group (GS, Fortune 500) to analyze its loan portfolio and evaluate various alternatives. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Thursday, June 26, 2008

KB Home's quarterly loss widens - Jun. 27, 2008


LOS ANGELES (AP) -- KB Home says its losses widened during the fiscal second quarter as it took charges to lower the value of inventory, joint venture deals and land option contracts, and had a drop in sales.


The Los Angeles-based homebuilder says it lost $255.9 million, or $3.30 per share during the quarter ended May 31, compared with $148.7 million, or $1.93 per share during the year-ago period.


Analysts polled by Thomson Financial, on average, forecast a loss of 94 cents per share, on sales of $691.3 million.


Revenue fell 55% to $639.1 million, from $1.41 billion during the year-ago period.


KB Home (KBH, Fortune 500) took a charge of $176.5 million to cut the value of its inventory and to abandon some land option contracts.


The company said that as of May 31, its unfilled orders were 54% lower than at the same time last year. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Existing home sales up for 2d time in 10 months - Jun. 26, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Sales of existing homes rose slightly more than expected in May as home buyers responded to plummeting home prices, according to an industry trade group.


The National Association of Realtors (NAR) said Thursday that the number of existing homes sold during May rose 2% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.99 million units in May from a level of 4.89 million in April.


Sales were 16% below the 5.93 million-unit pace in May 2007, the report showed. Thursday's report marks only the second time in 10 months that sales have increased.


Analysts were expecting the sales rate to increase to 4.95 million last month, according to a consensus of analysts' estimates gathered by Briefing.com.


The report also showed that the national median existing-home price for all housing types fell 6.3% to $208,600 from $222,700 a year earlier.


"Home buyers are starting to get off the fence and into the market, drawn by drops in home prices in many areas and armed with greater access to affordable mortgages," said NAR President Richard Gaylord, a broker with RE/MAX Real Estate Specialists, in a statement.


Total housing inventory at the end of May fell 1.4% to 4.49 million existing homes available for sale, indicating a 10.8-month supply at the current sales pace. That's down from a 11.2-month supply in April, according to the report.


The large supply of homes on the market favors buyers but it should take several more months to draw the inventory down, said Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist.


"Stabilization in home prices can only occur with buyers returning to the market, so we are encouraged by rising home sales, particularly in distressed markets," Yun said.


The housing market remains mixed around the country. But the report showed that highly overbuilt markets - including Sacramento, the San Fernando Valley and Monterey County in California, Sarasota, Fla. and Battle Creek, Mich. - all experienced sales increases versus last year.


Thursday's number comes on the heels of two other dour reports on the housing market.


The Census Bureau said Wednesday that May sales of new single-family homes fell 2.5% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 512,000 from April's revised reading of 525,000.


That report was preceded by the release of the S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city Home Price Index on Tuesday, which fell a record 15.3% on a year-over-year basis, and was down 1.4% from March. The 10-city index was down 16.3% year-over-year and 1.6% for the month.  


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Lennar's quarterly loss narrows - Jun. 26, 2008


MIAMI (AP) -- Lennar, one of the nation's largest homebuilders, said Thursday its second-quarter loss narrowed but the company also said it sees housing market conditions deteriorating even more this year.


Miami-based Lennar Corp. (LEN, Fortune 500) said losses shrank to $120.9 million, or 76 cents per share, from $244.2 million, or $1.55 per share, a year ago. The latest results include charges of 60 cents per share to write off land values and deposits.


Revenue fell 61% to $1.13 billion from $2.88 billion.


Analysts surveyed by Thomson Financial expected a loss of 55 cents per share on revenue of $1.09 billion.


Backlog fell 56% to $1.3 billion. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Tuesday, June 24, 2008

Going solar in the Sunshine State - Jun. 25, 2008


MIAMI (CNN American Morning) -- Jessie Prado sees himself as a bit of a trailblazer. His house in Boca Raton, Florida is easy to pick out. It's the only one with solar panels - and solar power. He, as well as his power company, Florida Power and Light, are making an investment in solar power in the Sunshine State.


"I think by me doing it, other people will see, and will learn," said Prado.


But believe it or not, Florida has never been considered a great place for solar power. Why? Too much moisture and rain.


"We do have moisture in the air and it scatters the light as it comes through the atmosphere," said Robert Reedy, the Director of the Florida Solar Energy Center at the University of Central Florida. "If you spend money on a piece of equipment that can capture the sun's energy - it's an investment," he said.


But big utilities like Florida Power and Light (FPL, Fortune 500) have historically been hesitant to build solar in the Sunshine State.


"We looked into solar, but for a long time we thought the technology and the pricing wasn't feasible to deploy it here," said Eric Silagy of FPL.


FPL has already built the largest solar power plant in the Mojave Desert, in California, and now it has just gained approval to build the nation's second largest solar plant in Martin County, Florida, northwest of West Palm Beach.


180,000 solar mirrors will span about 500 acres, and produce steam to help power up FPL's adjacent power plant, which is run off natural gas. It will produce enough electricity to power up about 11,000 homes.


And that is where solar energy's deficiencies lie. Solar panels are not efficient enough to provide all of our power. For example, FPL's Martin County plant is the largest fossil-fueled power plant in the country. To take it off line, and to provide totally solar power, you'd have solar-ray farms on nearly half the state of Florida.


And, what do you do for power when night falls? The sun doesn't shine 24-hours a day. Collecting the sun's rays in a battery system is not yet available.


"Right now, it's very expensive. The only way to efficiently store it is through batteries, large batteries," said Silagy. "But to do so on a large scale is just not technically feasible and very, very expensive," he said.


Prado has a small battery system to run a handful of appliances at night. His two dozen roof top panels are part of another form of solar power, called photovoltaic. His system immediately converts sunlight into electricity, but it's not nearly strong enough to keep his whole house running at the same time. His central air conditioning system, a must in Florida, uses far too much electricity to run on this system. He is saving about $75 a month off his electric bill.


Roger Messenger works for Vergona Bowersox, one of about 20 solar companies operating in Florida. "His house uses whatever it needs and anything left over, it goes back into the utility line and the utility pays him for what he sells back," said Messenger.


So, by using solar and by being frugal, Prado's electric bill is $6.86 this month, after he sold $27.93, in power, back to FPL.


An average home will cost, on average, just over $40,000 to equip it with a photovoltaic system, like Prado's. With state and federal rebates, the out-of-pocket cost is about $20,000.


"You always have to think long term on this kind of investment," said Prado. "It will pay itself off, probably in 7 years - 7 to 12 years depending on how much you invested into it, but then after that you don't have to pay for power anymore," he said.


And as the price of oil continues to rise, the out-of-pocket cost may not look so bad to folks anymore because the difference in price has narrowed. Right now, less than 1% of the United States is powered by solar. But, experts say, that can quickly change.


"It's all about volume," said Reedy. "We've seen it over and over. Cell phones, computers, calculators."


Reedy believes the market is getting serious. People, they say, are furious with the oil and gas situation. For instance, 24,000 FPL customers pay a monthly surcharge of $9.75 for this type of green energy to be built. Funds from the Sunshine Energy Renewable program funded a photovoltaic solar plant, in Sarasota, Florida. These customers don't get anything for their money except knowing that they helped their environment, in a very green way.


Jessie Prado thinks green too, and he looks forward to the day when his electric bill will be a thing of the past - and he'll be prepared if oil prices reach crisis levels.


"When I'm older, power won't be an issue for me," he said. "I don't have to worry, can I pay the electric bill? Because I know this will generate at least the minimal I will need to survive." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


California: Home sales soar but prices way down - Jun. 25, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- On Wednesday there was some good news for California, which has been one of the hardest hit states in the housing crisis, when a local realtor group said that sales there jumped 18% in May compared to May 2007.


But the hard times are far from over: Prices took a beating, plummeting 35% during the same period, according to a report from the California Association of Realtors (CAR).


"Home sales exceeded 400,000 (on an annualized adjusted rate) last month for the first time since early 2007," said CAR President William E. Brown. "While this is a welcome sign for the market, it was due in part to the large share of distressed homes for sale in many parts of the state."


May was the second straight month of increased sales volume in California, but that followed a disastrous string of 30 consecutive months of steady decline.


"What you're seeing in some of the hardest hit markets, like California and Florida, is that Americans still love bargains," said Mick Larson, a real estate analyst for Weiss Research. "And when the price is right people will buy."


Foreclosures spike

The state-wide median price for a home sold during the month was $384,840, down from $594,530 last May. That severe drop probably reflects the fact that there are so many distressed sales and low-priced homes on the market, according to CAR.


"[It reflects] the effect of a large number of short sales and foreclosures in the market," said CAR Vice President and Chief Economist Leslie Appleton-Young.


The Santa Barbara County area has been particularly hard-hit by falling prices; the median home sold there in May for $400,000, 24% below April prices, and 55% below May 2007.


Monterey County, down 49% since last May, and the Riverside-San Bernardino area, off 35%, also suffered steep losses.


Los Angeles prices fell 21% from a year ago, while San Francisco prices dropped 20%, and San Diego was down 27%.


The increased sales volume helped reduce the inventory of homes on the market to 8.4 months at the present rate of sales. That's down from 10.7 months of inventory that was on the market a year ago.


Additionally, far fewer new homes are being built.


"Builders have aggressively slashed housing starts," said Weiss. "That is working inventory levels down."


Most industry analysts agree that the big inventory overhang will have to be whittled down substantially more before home prices can begin to recover.


California had experienced some of the biggest run-up in prices during the bubble years, and the state has been hit hard in the slump.


Foreclosures have become a major problem. California recorded 72,000 foreclosure filings in May, the most of any state and its rate - one for every 183 households - trailed only Nevada. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Senate likely to move forward on housing bill - Jun. 25, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- An omnibus housing rescue package, some elements of which have been debated in Congress for years, was on track Wednesday to finally move toward enactment.


The Senate voted overwhelmingly on Tuesday to limit the hours of debate on the bill. But much of that debate got pushed due to procedural issues and the start of consideration of more than 40 amendments to the legislation.


In a press conference Wednesday morning, Senate minority leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., said he and the Senate majority leader, Harry Reid, D-Nev., have a general agreement that the "most pressing amendments" will likely be voted on and the bill "is likely to pass this week."


And on the Senate floor, Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said lawmakers were within a few hours of getting passage on the bill. "Within a couple of hours we could vote on it and send it to the House if only we can get it to the floor."


The package would create a new government-backed program to help at-risk borrowers. It also would change how two of the biggest players in the mortgage market are regulated and alter key rules in how they may operate. And it proposes measures intended to spur activity in the housing market.


Dodd said he and other leading senators were engaged in talks with House Financial Services Chairman Barney Frank, D-Mass., and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., to iron out differences between the Senate version of the housing package and the foreclosure-prevention bill that the House passed in May.


Once those differences are worked out, the bill the Senate votes on would likely pass the House as well. What remains unclear is whether lawmakers can get a bill to President Bush on July 4, the deadline Dodd and Shelby have pushed for.


The White House has signaled President Bush would veto the Senate bill in its current form. As a result, one element lawmakers are likely to discard is a provision that would give $4 billion in aid to states to buy up foreclosed properties - a measure the White House contends would do more to aid lenders than homeowners.


Major provisions

Even with amendments, the key measures likely to appear in the final bill are intended to prevent foreclosures, spur the housing market and increase oversight of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


The provision that has garnered the most attention is one that would allow the Federal Housing Administration to insure up to $300 billion in new loans for at-risk borrowers if lenders agree to write down loan balances below the appraised value of borrowers' homes.


The program, which would be voluntary for both lenders and borrowers, would be paid for in the Senate bill by the premiums borrowers pay and by fees from Fannie (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie (FRE, Fortune 500), the two government-sponsored enterprises that guarantee the purchase and trade of mortgages.


Critics of the plan say lenders are more likely to saddle the program with their worst loans - those most likely to foreclose. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that the program would end up guaranteeing 400,000 loans worth $68 billion, and of those, about a third would result in default. The CBO estimates the net loss from those defaults would be $680 million, or 1% of the total loan amounts guaranteed.


Another provision would raise the cap on the size of mortgages guaranteed by Fannie and Freddie to $625,000 from $417,000. The House version raises the limit to nearly $730,000.


The bill also calls for an independent regulator to oversee Fannie and Freddie, but Democrats are trying to amend the bill so that the regulator would not be put in place until the next president takes office.


Among the tax breaks in the legislation is a one-year tax credit for first-time buyers that would be worth up to $8,000. But in effect, the credit would work as an interest-free loan that the home buyer would eventually need to repay.


-- CNN producer Ted Barrett contributed to this article. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Home sales edge higher in May - Jun. 25, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- New home sales in May remained near historically low levels, according to a government report out Wednesday.


The Census Bureau reported that May sales of new one-family homes came in at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 512,000, down 2.5% from April's revised reading of 525,000.


The reading was higher than the consensus forecast of 510,000, according to estimates compiled by Briefing.com. But home sales are down more than 40% from May of last year.


The report also showed that the median sales price of new homes sold in May was $231,000 while the average sales price was $331,300.


The seasonally adjusted estimate of new houses for sale at the end of May was 453,000, according to the report. This represents a supply of 10.9 months at the current sales rate.


Wednesday's report follows the release of a closely watched index of home prices on Tuesday that showed a record decline in April.


The S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city Home Price Index fell to a record low of 15.3% on a year-over-year basis, and was down 1.4% from March. The 10-city index was down 16.3% year-over-year and 1.6% for the month. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Mortgage application volume falls 9.3 percent




NEW YORK (Associated Press) - Mortgage application volume fell 9.3 percent during the week ended June 20, according to the trade group Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly application survey.


The MBA's application index hit its lowest point of the year, falling to 461.3, down from 508.4 a week earlier.


Refinance volume fell 12.1 percent during the week, while purchase volume declined 7.4 percent. Refinance applications accounted for 36.3 percent of total mortgage applications, compared with 37.4 percent the previous week.


The index peaked at 1,856.7 during the week ending May 30, 2003, at the height of the housing boom.


An index value of 100 is equal to the application volume on March 16, 1990, the first week the MBA tracked application volume. A reading of 461.3 means mortgage application activity is 4.613 times higher than it was when the MBA began tracking the data.


The survey provides a snapshot of mortgage lending activity among mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts. It covers about 50 percent of all residential retail mortgage originations each week.


Application volume fell despite a drop in interest rates. The average rate for traditional 30-year fixed-rate mortgages fell to 6.39 percent from 6.57 percent a week earlier.


The average rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, often a popular option for refinancing a home, fell to 5.95 percent from 6.14 percent.


Rates for one-year adjustable-rate mortgages fell to 7.09 percent from 7.22 percent. Top of page


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Monday, June 23, 2008

Closing the book on Countrywide - Jun. 24, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Time will tell if Bank of America's purchase of Countrywide Financial Corp. winds up being a bargain or a boondoggle.


Shareholders of the troubled mortgage lender are widely expected to approve Bank of America's (BAC, Fortune 500) all-stock offer at a meeting this Wednesday, effectively removing the final hurdle to the deal and ending Countrywide's days as an independent. Bank of America has said a deal is likely to close in the third quarter, which begins next Tuesday.


But lately, some analysts have suggested that Bank of America may suffer a classic case of buyer's remorse once it absorbs Countrywide's (CFC, Fortune 500) $95 billion loan portfolio.


Last week, equity analysts at Standard & Poor's slashed their rating of Bank of America stock to "sell" from "hold." They fear the Charlotte, N.C.-based bank may be underestimating the impact of rising consumer defaults and delinquencies at Countrywide, especially with option adjustable rate mortgages (ARM).


Last month, Paul Miller, an analyst with Friedman, Billings, Ramsey & Co., warned that Bank of America's purchase could prompt it to take anywhere between $20 billion to $30 billion in writedowns.


"BAC [Bank of America] should completely walk away from the CFC [Countrywide] deal, as CFC's loan portfolio will prove a drag on earnings and could force BAC to raise additional capital," Miller wrote in a note.


Countrywide, the nation's largest mortgage lender, clearly is struggling. The company has reported losses in its last three quarters due to soaring mortgage delinquencies and defaults by borrowers. The stock plunged from about $30 per share last August to less than $6 a share just before BofA announced the deal.


Bank of America's concerns, however, don't just end at Countrywide's balance sheet.


The Senate Ethics Committee is looking into charges that top lawmakers including Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn. and Sen. Kent Conrad, D-N.D. got deals on their mortgages through a program for friends of Countrywide CEO and co-founder Angelo Mozilo.


Mozilo, who grew Countrywide from its modest beginnings, will leave the company but will still receive $10 million in stock from Bank of America. That's on top of the $115 million he stood to gain after the deal was announced. He later forfeited $37.5 million in payments tied to the deal.


Countrywide has also become the target of numerous government investigations so far this year, including the state of Florida and the U.S. Trustee's office, a division of the Justice Department. Both are looking into the company's lending practices. And that's not to mention the glut of lawsuits brought by borrowers.


Some analysts think Bank of America most likely took litigation expenses into account when it drafted its offer for Countrywide though.


Still, Bank of America is also going to need to drastically cut back its combined mortgage operations once the deal is done.


To that end, the company has hinted that job cuts lay ahead, saying in January that it planned to trim 11% of the combined mortgage companies' expenses.


"It will be a long time before they need people on the servicing side and they probably will cut a substantial amount on the mortgage origination side," said Malcolm Polley, president and chief investment officer at Stewart Capital Advisors in Pittsburgh, which owns approximately 23,000 shares of Bank of America.


Long-term benefits

When Bank of America first proposed the deal back in January, Wall Street was evenly split about its merits.


Some analysts speculated that the company offered too high an asking price -- the deal originally valued Countrywide at just over $4 billion and is now worth about $2.8 billion as BofA shares have fallen along with the broader financial sector in the past few months.


In addition, the deal would mean that Bank of America, which had largely avoided the subprime mess unlike many of its peers, would now be exposed to Countrywide's risky mortgage portfolio.


Others cheered the tie-up, noting it put Bank of America in a position to expand its already vast footprint in the financial services sector, by making it the nation's biggest mortgage lender and loan servicer.


And some large institutional shareholders in Countrywide, such as the Monaco-based hedge fund SRM Global went so far as to attack top Countrywide management, claiming that the buyout price of $4 billion was not high enough.


So is Bank of America getting Countrywide on the cheap?


Despite all the doubts regarding the deal, Bank of America's management has stood firmly by the transaction since it was first announced.


"I think it could be a combination that really turns out to be very good strategically," said Bank of America chairman and CEO Kenneth Lewis earlier this month at an investor conference.


Lewis added that if his company correctly estimated the number of markdowns they would have to take, the acquisition "could be a very compelling financial transaction."


But if Bank of America expects any payoff from the Countrywide deal, it should be patient, noted David George, senior research analyst at Robert W. Baird & Co. Inc.


When the housing market finally turns around -- and most analysts expect it will at some point -- Bank of America will have a nice head start with Countrywide's well-trained sales staff and mortgage lending technology platform.


"Over the near term, I think the Countrywide deal adds increased credit risk to BofA's balance sheet," said George. "Longer term, it could be a positive transaction." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Home prices in another steep drop - Jun. 24, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- U.S. home prices posted record declines in April, continuing a long losing streak for U.S. home prices.


The S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city Home Price Index fell to a record low of 15.3% on a year-over-year basis, and was down 1.4% from March. The 10-city index was down 16.3% year-over-year and 1.6% for the month.


The 20 city index is based on data going back 19 years, while the 10 city index is 21 years old.


"There might be some regional pockets of improvement, but on an annual basis the overall numbers continue to decline," said David Blitzer, Chairman of the Index Committee at Standard & Poor's.


The declines have been remarkably consistent through the past two years with prices on the 20-city index dropping for 21 straight months, since July 2006. The 10-city index has fallen every month since June 2006.


What's more, recent drops have been particularly steep. The 20-city index fell 3.5% in March, 2.6% in February and 2.3% in January, and now it has gone down another 1.4%.


Plummeting prices could derail some of the foreclosure prevention efforts underway across the nation. As home prices fall, they wipe out home equity, often leaving homeowners owing more on their mortgages than their homes are worth.


Some 10 million homeowners are now underwater, according to Moody's Economy.com, and more are added every month through home-price declines.


Underwater borrowers have higher rates of foreclosure than those who retain some home equity. Should they run into financial problems, borrowers can't use their homes as a source of cash. And some owners will simply walk away from a home that has lost much of its value rather than keep making expensive payments every month.


Foreclosed homes go back on the market, often at distressed sale prices, pulling down home values further, and adding to the downward spiral of prices. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Plan to aid distressed homeowners faces key test in Senate - Jun. 24, 2008


WASHINGTON (AP) -- A plan to help hundreds of thousands of homeowners avoid foreclosure is drawing bipartisan support in the Senate, setting the stage for high-stakes negotiations among congressional Democrats.


The far-reaching housing plan faces a Senate test-vote Tuesday, when it could also come to a final vote. The disputes among Democrats over key details, however, as well as a veto threat from the White House, will almost certainly push any final agreement into July.


Conservative "Blue Dog" Democrats are concerned about how to pay for the measure, while members of the Congressional Black Caucus - most of them liberal - call it "unacceptable," arguing it doesn't do enough to address the needs of African Americans.


The centerpiece of the package is a foreclosure rescue program in which the Federal Housing Administration would provide $300 billion in new, cheaper mortgages for distressed homeowners who otherwise would be considered too financially risky to qualify for government-insured, fixed-rate loans.


Borrowers would be eligible if their mortgage holders were willing to take a substantial loss and allow them to refinance, and would ultimately have to share with the government a portion of any profits they made from selling or refinancing their properties.


The bill would tighten controls and create a new regulator for Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500), which provide huge amounts of cash flow to the mortgage market by buying home loans from banks.


It also would provide a $14.5 billion array of tax breaks, including a credit of up to $8,000 for first-time homebuyers who buy a home in the next year and boosts in low-income tax credits and mortgage revenue bonds.


In a letter to Democratic leaders last week, the 42 House members of the Black Caucus said the bill is plagued with "glaring omissions," including affordable housing funds for states affected by Hurricane Katrina and grants for states and localities to buy and fix up foreclosed properties.


To draw GOP support, Senate Democrats diverted the affordable housing money to pay for the foreclosure aid program.


The Senate bill provides $3.9 billion in grants to deal with foreclosed properties -- compared with a House plan providing $15 billion - but the White House singled out the funds in its veto threat, and Blue Dogs are demanding that the money be offset with cuts elsewhere.


Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the Financial Services Committee chairman, said he'd be willing to yank the money and add it to a separate measure in the interests of a deal. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Love the home you're stuck with - Jun. 24, 2008


(Money Magazine) -- When prices were soaring, credit was flowing and selling was as easy as jamming a FOR SALE sign into your front lawn, the simplest way to upgrade your home was to sell and get the heck out of it. In other words, move to a bigger and better one.


True, some homeowners spent hundreds of billions of dollars renovating their digs during the boom times. But many saw those renos simply as a necessary step to get their homes ready to trade in.


Well, here's a crazy idea. Rather than tackling improvements as a way to move on up, why not do them to make yourself happier staying put for a while? You might not have a choice. With home sales down nearly 18% over the past year, it's a spectacularly lousy time to put your place on the market.


"It was a lot easier to justify trading up when prices kept going higher," says Daniel McGinn, author of "House Lust," a book chronicling America's fascination and obsession with homes. "But now that they're stagnating or going down, people are being forced to find ways to turn their homes into places where they want to live."


So if you can't be with the one you love, love the one you're with. Give your house the features you've been wanting the next one to have, from a luxe breakfast bar to a spa bathroom.


Don't fixate on each improvement's immediate payback. When you get around to selling after the market improves, you'll probably recoup most (though not all) of the costs - and maybe you'll find you've been liking the place so much that you don't want to move after all.


We recently surveyed dozens of realtors around the country to find out what homeowners are looking for in their next house. The same three answers kept popping up: more space, more modern conveniences and a few touches of luxury. Here are the smartest ways to get them - right now.


What you want: More space

Despite all the talk of how homes in the future will be smaller, today Americans still crave elbow room. Homeowners who bought recently or plan to buy soon say that they want their next house to have around 30% more square footage, on average, according to a 2007-08 survey by the National Association of Home Builders.


So what are your options if your house feels tighter than Carrie Bradshaw's closet?


Create the illusion of size. If you're saddled with the claustrophobic rooms (and overabundant doors) of the typical Cape or other starter home, begin with this simple and cheap fix: Take unneeded doors off their hinges and stow them away. Either live without them or install glass French doors in their place (they run about $400 each). The interior of your home will immediately feel lighter and more spacious, designers say.


If that's not enough, get out the sledgehammer. Surveys show that 40% of homeowners want only a half wall separating the kitchen from the family room; another 38% want no wall at all. Removal costs vary ($1,500 to $4,500), with load-bearing walls at the high end of the range.


Convert wasted space into living space. There may be no need to add to your current floor plan. Just finish your basement or another underused area, suggests Heather Harrison, a realtor in White Plains, N.Y.


A project like this can easily run $15,000 to $25,000, depending on how fancy you make it - but there's no cheaper way to expand your living space. By doing so, you can create a home office, playroom, or guest room. Even better: You can expect to recoup about 75% of your costs when you sell.


Add an outdoor room. In the past few years there's been a surge of interest in creating outdoor living space, according to surveys of architects. The good news: It doesn't take much to change your existing porches, decks and patios into "outdoor rooms."


To give a sense of enclosure, for instance, add hedges, fences or stone walls ($1,000 to $6,000). For shade, think about installing a retractable awning ($2,000 to $4,000; see durasol.com and sunsetter.com) or a vine-covered pergola ($3,000 to $5,000).


Or enclose your porch and turn it into a sunroom. It might cost $10,000 to $20,000, but sunroom additions pay you back nearly 60% of the costs at sale.


What you want: More modern conveniences

In a starter home you might be willing to put up with little annoyances like hauling window air conditioners around at the change of seasons or lugging laundry baskets up and down the basement stairs. But you don't need a change of address to eliminate these hassles.


Add a second sink. You can make a master bath - or any shared bathroom - more efficient by adding his-and-hers sinks. It can be a simple fix (estimated cost: $3,000 to $4,000 for a double sink vanity plus installation), but one that can pay huge happiness dividends (read: fewer early-morning spats between you and your spouse).


"There's certainly no worry that dual sinks are going to go out of style," says Minneapolis realtor Jesse Grumdahl. "Not as long as we all continue to lead such busy lives."


Build a laundry room. Most homeowners think of a separate laundry room as a "must have," according to a recent survey. But the vast majority don't want to have to trek to a dark, dingy basement to get to it.


The most popular option: Add a laundry area near your master bedroom. You can do this as part of a bathroom remodel ($6,500 to $8,500) or by putting stacking units and a floor drain in a former linen closet ($2,500 to $3,500).


Add central air. Except in those few blissful regions where the mercury hovers around 75°F all year, a whole-house cooling system ($6,000 to $16,000, depending on the size of the house and whether you already have ducts) is a no-brainer. There's a health bonus too: It'll dehumidify, which discourages mold growth, and filter out allergens.


What you want: A bit more luxury

Go ahead: Pamper yourself a little. "As long as you keep the improvements in line with the scale of the house, harmonious with its styling, and no more than a baby step fancier than the other houses on your block, you'll get your money back once the market stabilizes," says Leslie Sellers of the Appraisal Institute. That's especially true if your idea of luxury centers around the bath or kitchen.


Turn the master bath into a spa. "Make it spacious and uncluttered and give it a calming color, stone and wood surfaces, and a big soaking tub," says New York City realtor Deanna Kory.


If square footage permits, plan a shower stall plus a freestanding separate tub ($4,000 to $6,000 for a standard tub and shower; $8,000 to $12,000 for high-end fixtures).


Another popular "everyday luxury": a multihead or "car wash" shower ($2,000 to $4,000) that envelops your body with jets of water in all directions. Think what you'll save on massages!


Upgrade the kitchen. Nothing says luxury like a great-looking kitchen. A gourmet chef might crave commercial-grade appliances ($5,000 to $10,000 and up), but surveys say they're becoming less important to the rest of us.


Don't spend tens of thousands just to keep up with the Joneses. If your family uses the kitchen mostly for eating takeout or doing homework, skip the high-end gear and focus on a breakfast bar on the island or peninsula ($2,500 to $6,000).


Try to avoid trendier surfaces like concrete and stainless steel. "Who knows if granite will still be the In surface in 10 years, but it certainly won't be passé," says Schaumburg, Ill. realtor Joe Stacy. One thing he guarantees: The Formica you've got now will not be back in style. Ever. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Sunday, June 22, 2008

Dodd repeats denial of mortgage wrongdoing - Jun. 23, 2008


DANBURY, Conn. (AP) -- Sen. Chris Dodd said Monday that the controversy over two loans he received will not compromise his ability to lead Congress' efforts to ease the subprime mortgage meltdown.


Dodd, D-Conn., chairman of the Senate Banking Committee, also repeated that he received no special treatment from Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC, Fortune 500) His comments came before a speech to the Greater Danbury Chamber of Commerce.


"No. I don't think so at all," Dodd told The Associated Press, when asked if the mortgages he received would affect his high-profile role in seeking to stem the nation's housing foreclosure crisis.


Conde Nast Portfolio's Web site first reported more than a week ago that Countrywide made two loans at special rates to Dodd in 2003 to refinance homes in Washington and East Haddam, Conn.


The loans were reportedly part of a "V.I.P." program that gave preferential rates to "friends" of the company's chairman and chief executive, Angelo Mozilo. Several other notable politicians were participants in the program, the magazine said.


Dodd said on Monday that he and his wife refinanced their homes like millions of Americans did at the time and got a "market rate."


Dodd said he would have "walked away from it in a New York minute" if he had believed he was getting a special deal from Countrywide, a leading subprime lender at the center of the mortgage meltdown.


Portfolio, however, reported that the mortgage program participants got deals that were better than those available to ordinary borrowers.


The magazine said Dodd got a 4.25% interest rate on a $506,000 refinancing loan for his Washington town house, and a 4.5% rate on the $275,000 loan on his East Haddam home.


A large bipartisan coalition in the Senate last week beat back Republican efforts to gut legislation drafted by Dodd's Banking Committee calling for a massive foreclosure rescue.


The package includes $4 billion to help states buy and rehabilitate foreclosed properties, and would have government-sponsored mortgage giants Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) pay for the rescue.


House and Senate Republicans voiced reservations about the bill in light of the mortgage allegations against Dodd and others.


Dodd told the Chamber of Commerce on Monday that the housing crises, particularly increasing foreclosures, are at the heart of the nation's economic problems.


"This cannot go on," he said. "We've got to step up to do something to stem this hemorrhaging." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Study: Real estate market will grow long-term - Jun. 23, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The current housing market is bleak: home prices and sales are plummeting, foreclosure proceedings are skyrocketing and mortgage rates are on the rise.


When will things start to turn around?


A new study from the Joint Center for Housing Studies of Harvard University, "The State of the Nation's Housing 2008," finds the country poised to see an increase in housing demand over the next decade.


"The good news is that we still have a growing population," said Nicolas Retsinas, director of the Joint Center for Housing Studies and one of the study's authors. "As long as you have more households, more people are going to need places to live."


Social trends - people getting married later and divorced more often - are making single-person households the fastest growing household type, the study finds. In addition, a long-term net increase in potential home buyers will be driven by demographic factors: the aging of "echo boomers" into adulthood, an increased life expectancy for baby boomers and projected annual immigration of 1.2 million.


From 2010 to 2020, the number of households in the United States will grow by an average of more than 1.4 million per year, the study finds.


Unsold homes block growth


Still, before the housing market can turn around, it must first work off the record numbers of unsold homes on the market. From 2005 to 2007, the number of new and existing vacant homes for sale rose 46% to 2.12 million.


The nationwide glut of unsold homes has hit the real estate market hard, forcing down sale prices, stemming new construction and leaving millions of homeowners with properties worth less than the value of their mortgage.


In early 2008, the nation had an 11-month supply of unsold new homes and a 10.7-month supply of existing single-family homes, according to the Harvard study. A six-month supply of existing homes is considered a buyers' market. Reducing the current supply will require price declines, a decrease in interest rates, employment growth, a return of consumer confidence and the revival of accessible mortgage credit.


A reduction in new home construction is another key to decreasing inventory, Retsinas said. Privately owned housing starts fell 3.3% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 975,000 in May from 1 million in April, according to the Commerce Department.


A sharp drop-off in housing starts has precipitated housing turnarounds in previous bubble-bust cycles, said Karl Case, a Wellesley College economics professor and a co-founder of real estate consulting firm Fiserv CSW. Case also sees long-term growth in the housing market and agrees that immigration and other demographic trends will help fuel a long-term recovery.


"If household formation continues at pace, prices will recover and starts will rise again," Case said.


In the housing bust of the early 1990s, cities with big immigrant populations, like Los Angeles, recovered more quickly than other metropolitan areas, like Boston, with lower foreign-born, said Case.


"Not all immigrants buy houses, but many immigrants buy houses," Case said. "That has a positive effect on the prices in a market."


Regional recoveries


Retsinas said parts of the country, such as the Northeast, with fewer vacant homes could see signs of a recovery in spring 2009. He was less sanguine about markets like the Southwest, where excessive overbuilding at the height of the market means it could take two years or more to sell off excess inventory.


Recovery in the Midwest represents that biggest challenge, because the housing downturn there stems from regional economic problems beyond overbuilding.


"They're not reacting to an overheated housing market there," Retsinas said. "They live in an economy that is shedding jobs." 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Saturday, June 21, 2008

Bush, Congress may make deal on housing - Jun. 21, 2008


WASHINGTON (AP) -- President Bush and Congress have settled their differences on terrorist surveillance and Iraq war money. Now attention turns to a potential housing rescue, probably the last major initiative with any chance of passing before lawmakers scatter to campaign for re-election.


Bush has threatened a veto. But lawmakers in both parties say the housing legislation is a political imperative, and negotiators see the makings of a summertime bargain.


For one, the measure contains elements that Bush long has demanded. They include modernizing the Depression-era Federal Housing Administration and creating a new regulator for the government-sponsored mortgage companies Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.


Then there is the political reality for the president: Many Republicans are facing a darkening re-election outlook amid tough economic times and are reluctant to oppose a measure intended to address the crux of the financial crisis.


Sen. Richard Shelby of Alabama, the top Republican on the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Committee, says he hopes Bush will reconsider his veto threat. Insiders said the tepid wording of the threat, combined with intense behind-the-scenes negotiating by Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson to reach a deal, suggest the White House may be doing just that.


"The American people expect us to provide effective and timely solutions the best we can," Shelby said.


Democratic Sen. Charles Schumer, head of his party's Senate campaign committee, said the veto threat was "weird and wild" in light of Bush's demands for specific proposals that are in the legislation.


But Schumer, D-N.Y., said Democrats would be more than happy to bash Republicans for the demise of the housing rescue.


"This president is further and further removed from the economic realities of this nation. To veto this bill at a time when housing is at the nub of our economic crisis, at a time when housing prices are declining, at a time when foreclosures are increasing, makes no sense whatsoever," Schumer said.


Senate vote on Tuesday a key test


The bill would allow the FHA to insure $300 billion in new loans so homeowners who cannot afford their house payments could refinance into cheaper, fixed-rate mortgages.


An important test vote comes Tuesday, with a final Senate vote expected soon after. That probably will open a new phase of talks to work out differences with the House in hopes of sending the bill to Bush in July.


The housing crisis has ensnared many borrowers who had questionable credit histories and who obtained risky subprime loans. Such loans have reset to higher rates and home values have plummeted.


The housing plan is designed to respond to the crisis. Mortgage holders would have to agree to take a substantial loss on the original loans, bringing them more in line with the depressed value of the homes.


Some Republicans, including House Minority Leader John Boehner of Ohio, say that approach amounts to a bailout for reckless homeowners who borrowed more than they could afford and for banks that exploited foolish consumers with too-good-to-be-true loans.


"Don't have FHA set up to take the fall with the worst of the worst loans from lenders, some of whom may have been ones who really put us in the problem," said Sen. Kit Bond, R-Mo.


Bond's attempt to kill the housing bill this past week failed by an overwhelming bipartisan margin that demonstrated the Senate could enact the measure over Bush's veto.


When lawmakers are going home, "they're hearing about this problem, not just from their constituents, but also from their county officials, their mayors, business and community leaders, so it's not OK to just say, 'We'll let the market correct itself,"' said Josh Nasar of the Center for Responsible Lending. "They've got to run for re-election."


Key House lawmaker optimistic


Bush does not have to face voters in November. But his bargaining with Democratic leaders over terrorist surveillance and war spending last week showed he is ready to deal on issues that both parties want to neutralize before the elections.


"There really is no general good will about doing things together. It's more a question of taking things off the table that make both sides uncomfortable," said John Fortier, an analyst at the conservative American Enterprise Institute.


The housing measure could be the last such item.


Rep. Barney Frank, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, has offered to jettison $3.9 billion in grants for states and cities to buy and fix up foreclosed properties in the interests of a deal. The White House has said those grants would lead to a veto.


Other points of disagreement, such as limits on the size of loans that the FHA can back and that Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac can buy, probably will be the subject of intense negotiations.


"I think we're pretty close," said Frank, D-Mass. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Thursday, June 19, 2008

Foreclosure prevention: The states are where the action is - Jun. 20, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- While Congress has talked for a year about a federal response to the foreclosure crisis, attorneys general have been busy helping troubled homeowners at the state level.


AGs are filing lawsuits, lobbying legislatures for tougher mortgage lender laws, and partnering with mortgage servicers and community development groups to help rescue homeowners from foreclosures.


Their efforts have paid off. While the Mortgage Bankers Association says a million homes were in foreclosure in the first three months of 2008, one community advocate says that number would have been larger if the AGs weren't involved.


"When the highest law enforcement officer in the state starts demanding action, mortgage servicers are going to pay attention" said John Taylor, CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Corp., a non-profit redevelopment group.


In Illinois, Attorney General Lisa Madigan is going after mortgage brokers and lenders she claims used abusive lending practices.


She filed suit in November against Chicago-based mortgage broker One Source Mortgage, alleging the outfit drew in hundreds of clients by advertising low rates on option adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) but failed to inform borrowers that those rates would adjust upward, often very quickly.


One Source allegedly told one borrower his interest rate of 0.95% would last the entire first year of the loan. But it jumped to 7.5% after one month.


"The vast majority of people with these loans didn't understand them and were lied to by brokers," said Madigan.


The suit is still working its way through the courts. One Source's phone service has been disconnected and the attorney who represented it said One Source is no longer a client.


Madigan helped initiate a bill, now before the state legislature, requiring foreclosure notices to include an explanation of options that borrowers have to help them retain their houses. And she has used her influence with lenders and servicers to step up their foreclosure relief efforts and work closer with community groups offering counseling to at-risk borrowers.


Representing the client


Lori Swanson, attorney general for Minnesota, was a force behind a new state law requiring mortgage brokers to act in the best financial interests of their clients, much as attorneys do for clients or CEOs do for their companies.


"Instead of selling a mortgage like a car, the law requires that mortgage brokers take on the duty of agency, to act in the borrower's behalf," Swanson said.


That means brokers can't stick a borrower with a subprime loan just because it pays them more in fees and commissions. And it also means brokers are obliged to make sure borrowers understand exactly what kinds of costs and obligations they're signing up for.


"All loan originators should have fiduciary responsibility to clients," said Austin King, the director of the Financial Justice Center for Acorn, the non-profit advocate for low- and moderate income households.


Swanson is also going after companies that are bilking desperate homeowners by charging fees upwards of $2,000 and promising to save their homes from foreclosure.


"They say, 'I can save your home,' then they take the money and don't deliver any service at all," said Swanson, who brought lawsuits in April against National Foreclosure Relief, American Foreclosure Specialists and four other companies.


Massachusetts' Attorney General Martha Coakley went after a particularly invidious form of this crime called "equity stripping" in which scamsters persuade borrowers to temporarily assign them title to their homes so the foreclosure can't proceed. The crooks promise to make payments while homeowners repair their finances and get back in a position to pay their mortgages again.


But instead, the home rescuer works with a crooked appraiser to inflate the value of the home. They resell the house at a big price to a straw buyer who obtains a mortgage based on the inflated appraisal. The crew disappears with the cash from the sale and the one-time owner loses the house.


Coakley got state regulations changed to ban for-profit foreclosure rescue companies.


In March, New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo reached agreement with Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the government sponsored enterprises (GSEs) created to keep funds flowing in home mortgage markets. They agreed to buy mortgage loans only from lenders who used independent appraisers to value real estate.


Appraisers often inflate home values to ensure that sales go through. If an appraisal comes in low, underwriters won't approve the deal because it means the loan is not fully secured by the value of the asset. Inflated appraisals contributed to the overheated prices of the bubble years.


The vast majority of loans now trade through the GSEs, so the pact has the effect of preventing all loan originators from using anything but independent appraisers, not only in New York but all over the nation.


But there has been some pushback from federal bank regulators. The Office of the Comptroller of the Currency has charged that states have no authority over the nationally chartered banks that may be making these loans.


The Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight, which helps regulate Fannie and Freddie, is still talking with the GSEs about how they will respond.


The act of persuasion


State AGs have banded together in the State Foreclosure Prevention Working Group, under the leadership of Tom Miller of Iowa, to encourage lenders to offer more workouts to borrowers.


The group has pushed for better reporting of mortgage workouts from lenders and servicers so everyone can understand the kind of progress being made in avoiding foreclosures.


The working group released a report in April that found fully half the people asking servicers for help were not getting it.


That is a tragic number, according to Acorn's King. "So many foreclosures are fundamentally avoidable and unnecessary," he said. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


3 things to know about buying a foreclosed home - Jun. 20, 2008


(Money Magazine) -- Meet the latest desperate home seller: the bank. According to RealtyTrac, lenders repossessed 197,800 homes in the first four months of 2008 vs. 90,800 in that period last year.


Banks don't want to be in the real estate business, so sometimes they'll accept much less than you might think to get the darn things off their books - especially in markets having lots of trouble. But buying such properties has drawbacks. Here's what you need to know.


1. Websites can help you find foreclosed homes. On Redfin.com, you can do a free search for so-called real estate owned (REO) properties - those for which the bank holds the deed - in Baltimore, Boston, Los Angeles, San Diego, San Francisco, Seattle and Washington, D.C. (and soon, Chicago). Or you can locate them nationwide on Foreclosures.com or RealtyTrac.com for a subscription fee of $49.95 a month.


2. It's smart to go through a real estate broker. Forget buying directly from the bank (lenders typically deal only with pros) or at auction (you may wind up bidding more than you should). Work with brokers; banks use them to sell most homes. Once you've identified which properties are REO, you'll know those are the ones for which a low-ball offer is more likely to be accepted. Look for houses that have been on the market for more than 90 days and offer 10% to 30% less than asking.


3. Repair costs may be steep. Bank-owned houses typically need a lot of work: People facing foreclosure often neglect maintenance and may have swiped fixtures and appliances on their way out. Never buy an REO property without an inspection, and be sure to factor repair and remodeling work into your offering price. According to a recent survey by Remodeling Online, replacing a bathroom alone costs nearly $16,000, on average.  


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]


Wednesday, June 18, 2008

White House threatens veto of foreclosure rescue - Jun. 19, 2008


WASHINGTON (AP) -- A broad bipartisan coalition supporting a massive foreclosure rescue beat back GOP efforts to gut it Thursday, defying a White House veto threat and quashing a bid to make it victim to revelations about two senators' VIP mortgages.


Administration officials said they oppose the inclusion of $4 billion in the measure to help states buy and rehabilitate foreclosed properties, and a plan to have government-sponsored mortgage giants Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) pay for the rescue.


They announced those and other objections as two GOP senators said they would try to block the package until a committee can investigate how much Countrywide Financial Corp. (CFC, Fortune 500) and other lenders stand to gain from it.


House and Senate Republicans are voicing reservations about the bill in light of allegations that Senate Banking Committee Chairman Christopher J. Dodd, D-Conn., one of its architects, and Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., got cut-rate home loans through a VIP program at Countrywide, a leading subprime lender at the center of the mortgage meltdown.


Both said they neither sought nor knew about the special treatment.


"This bill has come together in such a way as to raise questions all over this country that we need to answer before we move ahead," Sen. Jim DeMint, R-S.C., said.


The Senate rejected, 70-11, the move by DeMint and Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky., to send the housing package back to Dodd's panel which would have essentially killed the measure.


Bipartisan backing

The election-year bill, which could help hundreds of thousands of struggling homeowners, appeared to be drawing wide bipartisan backing.


The Senate overwhelmingly defeated two amendments by Sen. Christopher S. "Kit" Bond, R-Mo., that would have derailed the measure. Both failed on margins large enough to override a promised veto, suggesting the plan could survive a showdown with President Bush.


Dodd and Sen. Richard C. Shelby of Alabama, the senior Banking Republican, said the veto threat was "disappointing," given that their compromise plan includes several elements Bush has demanded, and said they hoped the White House would reconsider.


"It's baffling why the White House would oppose a bill that would help so many American families at risk of losing their homes on the same day hundreds of mortgage fraud arrests were announced," said Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee.


One of Bond's proposals, which failed on a 69-21 vote, would have killed the foreclosure rescue. The other, defeated 77-11, would have essentially doomed an affordable housing fund financed by Fannie and Freddie, leaving it - and the mortgage aid plan - without a source of money.


Democrats and many Republicans consider the measure a political imperative amid rising foreclosures and growing public anxiety about the sagging economy.


Foreclosure rescue

Its centerpiece is a foreclosure rescue program in which the Federal Housing Administration would provide $300 billion in new, cheaper mortgages for distressed homeowners who otherwise would be considered too financially risky to qualify for government-insured, fixed-rate loans.


Borrowers would be eligible if their mortgage holders were willing to take a substantial loss and allow them to refinance, and would ultimately have to share with the government a portion of any profits they made from selling or refinancing their properties.


The measure is designed to help hundreds of thousands of borrowers in danger of losing their homes, but it also would benefit mortgage holders by allowing them to avoid costly foreclosures and reclaim some of what they're owed by people facing financial ruin.


The bill would tighten controls on Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac - which provide huge amounts of cash flow to the mortgage market by buying home loans from banks - creating a new regulator for the firms.


It also would provide a $14.5 billion array of housing and other tax breaks, including a credit of up to $8,000 for first-time homebuyers who buy a home in the next year, and boosts in low-income tax credits and mortgage revenue bonds.


VIP loan outrage

A group of 28 House Republicans wrote to Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., on Thursday demanding an investigation - with open hearings - on the Countrywide allegations.


"At a time when millions of Americans are struggling to repay their mortgage debts while coping with $4 per gallon gasoline and soaring foods prices, they will be outraged to learn that some members of Congress may have personally profited from their official positions through secret sweetheart deals on their mortgages," said the letter, signed by House leaders.


They called the revelations "extremely troubling" in light of upcoming votes on the housing package.


Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., the House Financial Services chairman, said his panel won't look into the Countrywide case, given the panel's already full schedule and a pending Senate Ethics Committee probe of the matter.


He defended Dodd in a statement, saying, "At no point in any of our joint efforts has Senator Dodd shown even the slightest indication that he was in any way influenced by considerations other than what was best for the economy and the American people."


Still, Frank and other Democrats have serious concerns about the Senate housing measure that could frustrate leaders' desire to send it to Bush before Congress breaks for a weeklong July 4 vacation. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]