Thursday, May 29, 2008

Hope Now: April peak for home rescues - May. 30, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Hope Now helped 183,000 at-risk borrowers stay in their homes during the month of April, according to numbers released by the coalition on Friday.

Hope Now, an alliance of mortgage lenders, servicers, investors and community advocacy groups, also said it has arranged a total of nearly 1.6 million loan workouts since the program began in July, 2007.

The April figure represents 23,000 more workouts than were completed in March, and the highest monthly total since Hope Now got started.

"These numbers clearly demonstrate that Hope Now is succeeding at helping homeowners avoid foreclosure and stay in their homes," said the organization's executive director, Faith Schwartz.

But most of the workouts - 105,000 - were repayment plans in which delinquent borrowers were simply given extra time to make up missed payments. About 77,000 of the workouts were actual mortgage modifications, which reduced a loan's balance or interest rate.

Modifications are usually considered more effective, long-term solutions for delinquent borrowers, since these workouts permanently lower a homeowner's monthly payments.

The report also revealed that there were more than 80,000 foreclosures in April, a pace that has accelerated this year and puts the country on track for nearly one million foreclosures this year.

No one wants that to happen, according to Schwartz.

"Foreclosure benefits no one: the borrower, community, lender and investor all lose," she said. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Wednesday, May 28, 2008

Trump sells Atlantic City casino for $316 million

ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. (AP) -- Atlantic City's Trump Marina Hotel Casino is being sold for $316 million to a New York company that plans to rename it "Margaritaville."

Coastal Marina LLC, an affiliate of Coastal Development LLC, said Thursday it is buying the casino from Trump Entertainment Resorts Inc., the casino company founded by real estate magnate Donald Trump.

After the sale, Trump Entertainment will have two remaining casinos in Atlantic City: The Trump Taj Mahal Casino Resort, and Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino.

"They are buying a wonderful building in a great location," Trump said in a statement. "It has been an important part of our company with a loyal customer base and a dedicated team."

Richard T. Fields, chairman of Coastal Marina, said the casino will take on a new identity once the sale closes. No timetable was given.

"Together with Jimmy Buffett's team at Margaritaville, our plans are to create an exciting new property that we believe will tap its full potential and make it one of the most successful destination gaming resorts in Atlantic City," Fields said.

Fields is the co-developer of the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel and Casino in Florida, and also owns a ranching company, Jackson Land and Cattle in Jackson Hole, Wyoming.

Trump Marina was the lowest performing of Trump's three Atlantic City properties. Located in the city's marina district, it was dwarfed by market leaders - and marina neighbors - the Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa, and Harrah's Atlantic City.

In the first quarter of this year, Trump Marina reported a 48% drop in gross operating profits to $4.8 million.

The sale marks the conclusion of an on-again, off-again courtship that Trump Entertainment Resorts has been conducting with potential suitors for the past year. At least two prior deals to sell all or part of the company fell through.

The company reported a wider quarterly loss in the first quarter of this year, blaming a general economic slowdown, competition from out-of-state slots parlors, and promotional costs associated with its new player loyalty program, TrumpONE, which tracks play and awards comps at all three Trump casinos. Each casino used to have its own player card.

The company reported a net loss of $18.6 million, or 59 cents per share, compared with a loss of $8.1 million, or 26 cents per share in the same period a year ago.

Mark Juliano, Trump Entertainment's chief executive officer, said cash from the sale will help it improve its two remaining properties, as well as look at potential opportunities outside Atlantic City.

"The execution of this transaction will provide us with additional financial flexibility to effectively master-plan the future path of our company in the midst of an overall transformation which has already been marked by many successes," he said.

The company's largest project is a new 782 room hotel tower at the Taj Mahal due to open in September.

Trump Marina covers 14 acres and includes a 27-story hotel with 728 guest rooms, including 153 suites. It has 79,000 square feet of casino floor space and approximately 58,000 square feet of convention, ballroom and meeting space.

It also has an 11-bay bus terminal and a roof-top helipad, as well as a nine story parking garage capable of accommodating approximately 3,000 cars. The property also includes the lease for the Senator Frank S. Farley State Marina.

Trump Entertainment Resorts (TRMP) shares rose 47 cents, or 16.3%, to $3.36 in morning trading Thursday. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Mortgage rates rise, topping 6%

(CNNMoney.com) -- Rates on 30-year mortgages were pushed up this week above 6 percent amid growing concerns about inflation, mortgage backer Freddie Mac said Thursday.

Freddie Mac said 30-year fixed-rate mortgages averaged 6.08% with an average of 0.6 point, up from 5.98% last week. Last year at this time, the 30-year loan averaged 6.42%.

"Mortgage rates drifted up this week over market concerns that the Federal Reserve Board may raise short-term rates later this year," said Frank Nothaft, Freddie Mac vice president and chief economist, in a statement.

"A recent working paper published by the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis suggested that the recent rate cuts run a risk of unhinging long-term market expectations for inflation," Nothaft added.

"Indeed, market inflation expectations increased over the last few weeks and the federal funds futures market now has a 25 basis point rate hike priced in by the end of the year."

Rates on five-year adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 5.62 percent this week, with an average 0.5 point, up slightly from last week when it averaged 5.61 percent. A year ago, the 5-year ARM averaged 6.19 percent.

The rate for one-year ARMs averaged 5.22 percent this week with an average 0.6 point, down slightly from last week when it was 5.24 percent. At this time last year, the 1-year ARM averaged 5.57 percent. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Tuesday, May 27, 2008

Mortgage applications fall as rates rise

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Mortgage application volume fell 4.6% during the week ended May 23, according to the trade group Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly application survey.

The MBA's application index fell to 593.3 during the week, from 621.6 the previous week.

Refinance volume declined 8.9%, pushing total volume lower. Refinance applications accounted for 46.1% of total applications, down from 48.2% a week earlier.

Purchase volume rose 0.1%.

The index peaked at 1,856.7 during the week ended May 30, 2003, at the height of the housing boom.

An index value of 100 is equal to the application volume on March 16, 1990, the first week the MBA tracked application volume. A reading of 593.3 means mortgage application activity is 5.933 times higher than it was when the MBA began tracking the data.

The survey provides a snapshot of mortgage lending activity among mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts. It covers about 50% of all residential retail mortgage originations each week.

Application volume declined as interest rates climbed. The average interest rate for traditional, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages increased to 5.96% from 5.90% a week earlier.

Rates for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages -- a popular option for refinancing a home -- averaged 5.49% during the week ended May 23, compared with 5.42% the previous week.

The average interest rate for one-year adjustable-rate mortgages rose to 6.92% from 6.71%. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Banks miss an easy housing fix

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Banks say they want to help troubled homeowners, but they are delaying deals that could save everyone - including the lenders themselves - a lot of time and money.

Lenders are taking much longer than necessary to approve short sales, according to Duane LeGate, of House Buyers Network, a short sale specialist.

In a short sale, a homeowner who cannot keep up with their loan asks the lender to take a dollar amount less than what is owed on a home's mortgage, and forgive the remainder of the unpaid debt.

So if a borrower has a mortgage balance of $100,000 and finds a seller who will pay $95,000 for the house, the lender agrees to accept that $95,000 and close out the loan.

"There was a much greater chance of success with these in the past," said LeGate

Ideally in a short sale, everyone wins. Borrowers avoid the ugly foreclosure process that destroys their credit, while lenders recoup more of their costs than they would by spending the time and money it takes to kick an owner out and resell the property.

Lenders typically lose about 19% of a mortgage's value in a short sale, according to Clayton Holdings, a Conn.-based, provider of loan analytics, while they lose an average of 40% on loans that go into foreclosure.

Coldwell Banker CEO Jim Gillespie agrees that short sales are taking too long to complete. And he speaks from firsthand experience; a short-sale offer he made on a house in Marin County, Calif. in late fall didn't win approval until April.

But most buyers can't, or won't, wait that long."That's been our biggest challenge - keeping the buyers interested long enough as we wait and wait for an answer," said Jeff Morrell, a Colorado Springs real estate agent who specializes in short sales.

Running out the clock

John Fitzmorris, a short-sale expediter in East Stroudsburg, Penn., was working with Robson and Laura Pereira, who were behind on their mortgage, to market their home before a foreclosure would take it away.

"She worked, but he had a construction business that went defunct," said Fitzmorris. "That put them in trouble."

Falling home prices in the area made a normal sale impossible; the couple was upside-down in their mortgage, owing more on the property than it was worth on the current market.

After they fell behind on their payments, Laura Pereira said, "the bank sent me a letter asking me to call for help. I called them four or five times and they never got back to me. We had three [short sale] offers on the house at the time."

Fitzmorris, who has been doing short sales for more than 20 years, contacted the bank about a short sale well before the foreclosure date.

"We sent an authorization letter listing us as the contact for a short sale, a sales agreement, a completed seller's information document as well as listing and marketing information to First American Loss Mitigation, which was handling the Pereira's foreclosure process, on January 24," he said. The buyer was very interested - enough to pay for a title search.

A month later, Fitzmorris sent another complete package, including a sales contract, to the bank and started to call daily for feedback on the short-sale offer.

Greystone didn't respond until March 10, when it said that it had the file and would process it.

But by March 27 the bank still hadn't approved the short sale, and the Pereira's property went to sheriff's sale. (The bank did not respond to several requests for comment.)

"The offer we sent to the bank was $129,500," said Fitzmorris. "But another investor, TM Builders, bought the property at the sheriff's sale for $100,265."

By the time the Pereira's lost their house, they owed a total of $160,000, including principal of $144,500 in addition to late fees, legal fees, and so forth. So in the end, the bank lost $60,000 on the loan, when it could have lost $30,000 by doing a short sale.

Ironically, TM Builders flipped the home to Fitzmorris's buyer for the $129,500 short-sale price, money the bank would have gotten had it acted more quickly.

"The sellers did what they could to mitigate the problem but the bank didn't respond, which hurt both the sellers - with an unnecessary foreclosure permanently impacting their credit - and the bank," said Fitzmorris.

Usual suspect

The difficulty in getting short sales approved stems from the same hurdles facing all the other foreclosure prevention efforts. The fact that the majority of mortgages are pooled and securitized makes it hard to get approval to change the terms of the mortgages.

"It has to do with who owns the loan," said LeGate. "If a mortgage is stuck in a pool somewhere, when something goes wrong, no one knows who the actual owner of the note is."

Additionally, the volume of troubled borrowers makes it hard for lenders to keep up. The housing crisis has put an enormous burden on mortgage servicers, the companies that manage loans for securities investors.

At many servicers, said LeGate, "There's no one really skilled at loss mitigation, and these guys have more work than they were prepared to do."

And with foreclosure filings breaking new records each month, there's no sign that this problem will ease any time soon.

Says Laura Pereira "I feel the bank really let us down." See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Monday, May 26, 2008

Blocking online home listings limits competition: Settlement - May. 27, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Justice Department gave online real estate brokers - and potentially their clients - a boost Tuesday by forcing a new industry policy opening access to home listings the agents were previously denied.

In a court settlement, government attorneys said the National Association of Realtors could no longer discriminate against Internet-based agents by blocking them from the group's multiple listing service, a database of for-sale properties.

Online agents often charge lower fees and allow consumers to review listings at their own pace.

"When there is unfettered competition from brokers with innovative and efficient approaches to the residential real estate market, consumers are likely to receive better services and pay lower commission rates," said Deborah A. Garza, deputy assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's antitrust division.

The National Association of Realtors eased some of its policies against online brokers when the Justice Department filed suit in September 2005. The group called Tuesday's settlement a "win-win" and noted that it will neither pay a fine nor admit any liability as part of the agreement.

"Today I can say with the clear knowledge - reinforced and underscored by DOJ's settlement compromise - that the real estate industry is dynamic, entrepreneurial and fiercely competitive," NAR President Richard F. Gaylord said in a statement. "Thanks to Realtors, consumers can access detailed information about millions of properties for sale across the country."

The Justice Department and Federal Trade Commission released a report last year that said limits on discount brokers' access to Web listings of for-sale properties has prevented consumers from receiving the cost savings and other benefits that online competition has brought to other industries.

The report found that more consumers use the Web when house hunting than rely on "For Sale" yard signs. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

New home sales rise unexpectedly but remain near 17-year low - May. 27, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- New home sales rose unexpectedly in April but remained near historically low levels, according to a key government report on the battered housing market.

April sales came in at a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 526,000, a Census Bureau report showed, up 3.3% from a revised 509,000 in March. The reading was above the consensus forecast of 520,000, according to economists surveyed by Briefing.com.

Home sales were down 42% from a year earlier. April's reading was the second-lowest annual rate since October 1991, behind March of this year. April's reading matched the initial number for March, but March's reading was revised down in the April report.

The median price of a new home sold in April was $246,100, up 1.5% from $242,500 a year earlier.

This slight bump probably doesn't accurately capture the weakness in prices for new homes, since about three out of four builders have reported having to pay buyers' closing costs or offer other incentives such as expensive features for free in order to maintain sales.

Prices have been driven down recently by the glut of new homes on the market.

The report showed 181,000 completed new homes available at the end of the month, bringing total inventory - including new homes under construction and not yet started - to 456,000, equal to a seasonally adjusted 10.6-month supply.

The report is the latest sign of trouble in the overall housing market.

Friday, the National Realtors Association reported existing home sales fell to near-record lows in April, and an Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight report said Thursday the prices of homes sold in the first quarter of 2008 posted a record declineSee Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Home prices plunge 14.1% in first quarter

NEW YORK (AP) -- U.S. home prices dropped at the sharpest rate in two decades during the first quarter, a closely watched index showed Tuesday. It's a somber indication that the housing slump continues to deepen.

Standard & Poor's/Case-Shiller said its national home price index fell 14.1% in the first quarter compared with a year earlier, to its lowest level since its inception in 1988. The quarterly index covers all nine U.S. Census divisions.

The narrower indices also set record declines. The 20-city index tumbled 14.4% during the quarter, the lowest since that index was started in 2001. The 10-city index plunged 15.3%, a record in its 20-year history.

"There are very few silver linings that one can see in the data. Most of the nation appears to remain on a downward path," said David Blitzer, chairman of S&P's index committee.

Nineteen of the 20 metro areas surveyed reported annual declines, with 15 of them posting record lows. Six metro areas lost more than 20%.

Las Vegas had the worst quarterly performance, falling 25.9%, followed by Miami and Phoenix. Only Charlotte, N.C., stayed above water, gaining less than 1% over the previous year. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Thursday, May 22, 2008

Housing relief: Help, but for how many?

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- When the Senate Banking Committee passed a housing bill intended to limit foreclosures, panel Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., said he expected the measure could help 500,000 borrowers stay in their homes.

While the bill could help a lot of people, it's unlikely to help 500,000.

The bill's key provision would allow the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) to insure up to $300 billion in new loans for at-risk borrowers if lenders agree to write down loan balances below the appraised value of borrowers' homes.

The Congressional Budget Office has not yet released its official estimates of the bill's FHA proposal.

But in analyzing the potential costs and reach of a similar proposal passed by the House in May, the CBO estimated that 500,000 borrowers may enter the program - and that 35% of them could still default. So the best estimate of the net number of borrowers who will stay in their homes under the program is 325,000.

That would reduce anticipated foreclosure filings by 8% over the next few years, according to an estimate from Goldman Sachs analyst Alec Phillips.

That's not the only factor that could reduce the number of homeowners helped by the Senate bill. In making its estimates, the CBO assumed a June 1 start date for the FHA program. But the Senate version of the legislation - considered more politically viable than the House bill - would start the program on Oct. 1.

That four-month difference is likely to flush from consideration a segment of the bill's immediate target group: the 1.5 million subprime borrowers with adjustable-rate mortgages (ARM) whose loans are scheduled to reset in 2008.

Come Oct. 1, many of those whose ARMs reset between January and May might have already had their homes repossessed or left them during the foreclosure process.

Typically foreclosure proceedings begin after a mortgage payment is 90 days past due. Homeowners who are unable to reach deals with their lenders for more affordable loans may lose their homes within three or four months after the 90-day delinquency period, said Rick Sharga, vice president of marketing for Realty Trac, which publishes foreclosure data.

So those whose rate reset on Jan. 1 could lose their home by June or July. Likewise, anyone whose rate reset in February, March, and April could lose their homes before the new FHA program would go into effect. Some portion of those whose rates reset in May - one of the peak months for subprime ARM resets - could be in the same boat.

"The people the bill will most likely help are those resetting in the third quarter and beyond." Sharga said. "The people who reset in the first quarter will almost certainly be beyond help."

In some states, however, it takes as long as a year to go through the whole foreclosure process, giving some borrowers whose loans reset early in the year a potential chance to use the Senate-proposed version of the FHA program should it become law.

A congressional plan to limit foreclosures would have been most effective if it caught more subprime borrowers before their rates reset. That's because the repossession rate on homes of borrowers with subprime ARMs rises dramatically after reset, according to First American CoreLogic LoanPerformance data from the past decade. The same holds true when considering foreclosure filings and repossessions combined.

Of course, choosing a start date for the FHA program isn't just a matter of figuring out how to limit the maximum number of foreclosures. "There's upfront planning that needs to occur for this to be successful," said Jaret Seiberg, an analyst with the Stanford Group, a Washington policy research firm.

And then there's the political calculus. The bill has been the source of heated wrangling between Democrats and Republicans, which has delayed its path to enactment.

"At the end of the day you compromise to get legislation enacted. But it's better to start the program later than have it lie dead in the Senate." See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Homes sales dip in April

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Sales of existing homes slowed in April, while inventory soared according to the latest reading of the sagging housing market by an industry trade group released Friday.

The National Association of Realtors reported that sales by homeowners dipped in April to an annual pace of 4.89 million, down 1% from the revised March reading of 4.94 million.

The existing home sales rate - including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops - is 17.5% below the 5.93 million units sold in April 2007.

The 4.89 million sales figure came in slightly ahead of the 4.85 million annual pace of home sales that was expected by economists surveyed by Briefing.com.

The median price of a home sold during the month fell 8% from a year ago to $202,300, down from $219,900. Prices are being pushed down by the growing number of existing homes on the market.

Total housing inventory at the end of April rose 10.5% to 4.55 million homes available for sale, which represents an 11.2-month supply at the current sales pace, up from a 10.0-month supply in March.

Before the start of the current housing slump, it had been 11 years since prices had fallen compared to a year earlier.

"Some markets like San Diego, Calif., and Fort Myers, Fla., are experiencing rising sales after sudden double-digit drops in local home prices, so lower prices and low interest rates are starting to generate results," said Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist in a report.

Single-family home sales slipped 0.5% to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 4.34 million in April from 4.36 million in March, which is 16.1% below the 5.17 million-unit level from one year ago.

The median existing single-family home price was $200,700 in April, down 8.5% from April 2007.

Regionally, existing-home sales in the West actually rose 6.4% in April from March to a level of 1 million, propping up the national average. However, even though sales in the West were up, they are still 15.3% below a year ago. The median price in the West was $285,700, which is 16.7% lower than April 2007.

Sales in the Northeast fell 4.4% to an annual pace of 870,000 in April, 14.7% below a year ago. The median price in the Northeast was $262,000, which is 7.7% below April 2007.

In the Midwest, existing-home sales were at an annual rate of 1.1 million in April, which is 6.0% below March and 19.7% lower than April 2007. The median price in the Midwest was $159,100, down 2.9% from April 2007. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Wednesday, May 21, 2008

Home prices see largest recorded fall. - May. 22, 2008

Washington, D.C. -- The prices of homes sold in the first quarter of 2008 posted a record decline, according to a new report from the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight.

Home prices fell 3.1% from the first quarter of 2007, the largest decline in the purchase-only index, which excludes refinancings, since the agency began keeping records 17 years ago.

First-quarter prices dropped 1.7% from the fourth quarter, the largest quarterly dip ever.

"It's not going to be the largest decline on record for long," said Peter Schiff, president and chief global strategist at Euro Pacific Capital."Prices are going to keep falling until we get to the equilibrium, which is much, much lower. This is only the beginning."

The inflation-adjusted price of homes fell 7.7% on a year-over-year basis. At the same time, the prices of other goods and services rose 4.6%, according to OFHEO.

"The nominal price declines aren't as spectacular as they would be if we didn't have so much inflation," Schiff said. "Houses are becoming a less valuable asset relative to the cost of living."

OFHEO reported that prices fell in 43 states, with eight states seeing quarterly price declines of more than 3%. California and Nevada were the biggest losers, with home prices falling more than 8% in both states.

Prices on all transactions, including homes sales and refinancings, fell 0.2%year-over-year and remained flat compared to the fourth quarter, OFHEO reported.

California, Nevada, Florida, Arizona and Michigan exhibited the greatest price depreciation in all transactions in the first quarter. Wyoming, Utah, Montana, Texas and Alabama saw prices for all transactions increase the most. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

New jumbo mortgages are slow to take off - May. 22, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- When the housing crisis hit last summer, it became very hard for borrowers to land the jumbo loans they needed to buy homes in high-priced areas, like California and New York.

So as part of the Economic Stimulus Act, Congress tried to get funds for jumbo loans flowing again by temporarily raising the dollar limits for mortgages that Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) can buy. The two government-sponsored entities had previously only been permitted to buy so-called conforming loans of up to $417,000, and then resell them on the secondary market.

The new limits raised that conforming loan cap to as much as $729,750 in some high-priced metro areas through December 31, in order to make home loans more readily available to help stabilize falling markets.

But the move hasn't worked well to juice the market, and so the House Financial Services Committee is holding a hearing Thursday to examine why that is.

"The liquidity crisis in mortgages has given added impetus to expanding the conforming loan limit in high-cost areas. As the correction took hold last fall and winter, jumbo and other non-conforming lending all but ground to a halt in many markets," said Thomas Lund, executive vice president for Fannie Mae in his testimony.

Higher prices persist

Despite the increased caps, these new 'conforming jumbo loans' - for anything between $417,000 and $729,750 - are still more expensive than the conforming loans below $417,000.

For months after the conforming jumbos were introduced, interest rates for them ranged between a point and a point and a half higher than on regular conforming loans. That made jumbo loan borrowing much more expensive; for a $600,000 mortgage, a borrower paid an extra $400 to $600 a month.

In the past, the spread between jumbo and conforming loans was much smaller, a quarter point or so.

"[The raised caps] produced less activity than I thought they would," said Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., in opening remarks at the hearing.

"Beneficial effects have be slow to materialize," added Spencer Baccus, ranking republican member from Alabama.

The problem: The investors who buy mortgages on the secondary market still consider these new conforming jumbo loans riskier than the original conforming loans, and put a higher risk premium on them.

"The ultimate investor was not comfortable with the prices of the new jumbos," said according to Rob McDonald, director with the global business advisory firm FTI Consulting. "The secondary market participants needed to accept the prices Fannie and Freddie were offering."

That reluctance comes despite the fact that buyers who use jumbo mortgages tend to be better credit risks and often put more money down, McDonald said.

Part of the problem is simply that fear is contagious.

"If there's a credit squeeze, despite the higher credit profiles of jumbo loans, there's hesitancy on the part of mortgage backed securities buyers," he said. "This gets to the correlation between subprime secondary mortgage markets and conforming secondary markets."

A different kind of security

Indeed, Fannie and Freddie don't actually package the conforming jumbos for sale to investors in the same way they treat the sub-$417,000 conforming loans. They are not what's called "TBA-eligible." These are "to-be-announced" transactions where the purchase price is settled at some future date.

The GSEs decided back in February to exclude jumbo conforming loans from TBA-eligible pools. But the TBA market is well established and understood by investors, according to Jay Brinkman, an economist with the Mortgage Bankers Association (MBA).

"Buyers of securities feel very secure about this market," he said. "They're accustomed to the pricing and they know how the securities perform."

The exclusion of conforming jumbos from that market makes them a somewhat unknown security. "No one is sure what their performance will be, so no one is sure how to price them," said said Keith Gumbinger, of HSH Associated, a publisher of mortgage market information.

The Mortgage Bankers Association argued that the new conforming jumbos should be issued as TBA products but there was resistance to this. Fannie and Freddie were hesitant to introduce any new element that might harm the conforming loan market.

"They said, 'The conforming market is the only one really functioning. Don't mess it up by adding jumbos to it,'" said Brinkman. Indeed, jumbos perform differently for investors than conforming loans.

Jumbo borrowers are more likely to pay off their loans early, which cuts off the revenue stream of their interest payments for investors, while those with $100,000 mortgages tend to keep making the same monthly payment year after year.

If jumbos were packaged with these in the same MBSs, investor would require higher interest rates to purchase them and borrowers of conforming loans would have to pony up the increased interest, in effect subsidizing more affluent, jumbo loan borrowers.

There are other risk factors that makes investors wary. Jumbos are, by definition, less diverse geographically; they're only available in about 70 metro areas - many of the most challenging markets in the nation.

"Look at the markets where these are offered," said Gumbinger. "It's where home prices are falling. An investor will say, 'I'll buy them but I have to get more yield out of them.'"

In early May, Fannie made a change in the way these loans are handled; instead of packaging them for sale on the open market, they are keeping them in their portfolios. Fannie can set the price itself and is doing so as if the loans were TBA-eligible.

As a result, the pipeline for the loans has opened up during the last couple of weeks, according to Fannie.

And Gumbinger says that spreads between conforming and jumbo conforming have narrowed down to below half a point, good news for home buyers in high-priced areas.

Meanwhile, however, interest rates for non-conforming jumbo loans have not improved much, according to Gene Choi, president of Commodore Mortgage Group in Jersey City. "In that market, the pricing is still much higher," he said.

"In January, I had a guy buying a $1.4 million home in New Jersey whose loan was going to be in the upper sevens, 7.875% or so," said Choi, "He was very surprised." See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Tuesday, May 20, 2008

Mortgage applications drop 7.8%

NEW YORK (AP) -- Mortgage application volume fell 7.8% during the week ending May 16, according to the trade group Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly application survey.

The MBA's application index fell to 621.6 from 674.4 the previous week as both refinance and purchase volume declined.

Refinance volume fell 8.7% during the week, while purchase application volume fell 6.9%.

Refinance applications accounted for 48.2% of all applications during the week, compared with 48.7% the previous week.

The index peaked at 1,856.7 during the week ending May 30, 2003, at the height of the housing boom.

An index value of 100 is equal to the application volume on March 16, 1990, the first week the MBA tracked application volume. A reading of 621.6 means mortgage application activity is 6.216 times higher than it was when the MBA began tracking the data.

The survey provides a snapshot of mortgage lending activity among mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts. It covers about 50% of all residential retail mortgage originations each week.

Application volume fell as interest rates moved higher. The average rate for traditional, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages rose to 5.9% from 5.82% a week earlier.

The average rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, a popular option for refinancing a home, rose to 5.42% from 5.38%.

Rates for a one-year adjustable-rate mortgage averaged 6.71% during the week, compared with 6.6% the previous week. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Reverse mortgages: Beware the come-ons

(MONEY Magazine) -- Last year, borrowers took out more than 132,000 reverse mortgages - 50% more than the year before and almost 10 times as many as five years ago. Such loans, as you may already know, allow you to draw down your home equity if you're 62 or older without repaying it as long as you stay in your house.

That's good news. Reverse mortgages can help cash-strapped retirees generate extra money for living expenses, pay for home improvements, lower other debts or fund the occasional splurge.

There's also a downside to reverse mortgages' growing popularity, however. Loan-origination fees that can top $7,000 on a $500,000 home are attracting aggressive salespeople intent on getting you to take out a reverse mortgage whether you need one or not. Some may try to persuade you to invest the proceeds in high-priced financial products, such as annuities, boosting their commissions even more.

No one can say how widespread such tactics are. But the Senate Special Committee on Aging was concerned enough to hold a hearing in December, while FINRA (the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority) issued an investor alert in March. Several lawsuits have also been filed, including a class-action alleging, among other things, that Financial Freedom, one of the largest reverse-mortgage lenders, encouraged brokers to steer seniors into the loans under the guise of providing financial planning services. Financial Freedom says the allegations "are baseless and without merit" and that the company "does not sell, require, promote or recommend annuities to reverse-mortgage borrowers."

So if you've been considering a reverse mortgage, how can you avoid making a misstep? Follow these three tips.

Make sure you really need it

A reverse mortgage can generate cash, but it's not the only way or necessarily the best. Up-front costs can exceed 10% of the loan, making a reverse mortgage a very expensive option if you're borrowing a small amount or you plan to move in a few years. In such cases, you might pay far less by taking out a home-equity line of credit. And hanging on to your home might not be a great idea. You may be able to generate more income by selling and moving to a less expensive place.

Look out for the product pitch

A 2006 AARP survey found that one in 10 reverse-mortgage borrowers had been pitched a financial product along with their loan, most often deferred annuities but also long-term-care policies. Buying an annuity with reverse-mortgage proceeds rarely makes sense though. As the example below shows, you're unlikely to earn more with an annuity than you are being charged in interest and fees on the reverse mortgage. Worse, you might have to pay surrender charges that are upwards of 20% to take money out in the first few years.

Using a reverse mortgage to pay for long-term-care insurance is tougher to evaluate since it depends on your assets and resources, the cost of the policy and the odds you'll end up in a nursing home for an extended period. "But as a general rule," says Donald Redfoot of AARP's Public Policy Institute, "if you've got to borrow to be able to pay for the cost of a long-term-care policy, then you're probably not a good candidate for one."

Get help from a financial planner

The federal government requires you to meet with a counselor before taking out a reverse mortgage. The quality of the counseling is uneven though. This spring, HUD will promulgate new standards for counseling and require a discussion of the implications of using loan proceeds to buy annuities. If you want a rigorous analysis of whether you're better off with a reverse mortgage or a less expensive home, however, you should consult a fee-only financial planner. (Don't let him sell you an annuity either!) After all, you want to be sure that the equity you took years to accumulate enriches your retirement rather than a salesman's wallet.

Sure loser

A salesperson might prod you to get a reverse mortgage so you can buy an annuity. But the annuity's value will never catch up to the mortgage debt.

Sign up for Updegrave's weekly e-mail newsletter at cnnmoney.com/expert.  See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

The high cost of a green dream

(MONEY Magazine) -- As a girl in South Korea, HyoJung Kim did her schoolwork on brownish-gray recycled paper and rarely threw things away because government-mandated garbage bags cost $1 apiece.

Arriving in the United States for graduate school, she was stunned to see trash piled high on city sidewalks and documents printed on a single side of white paper. In her home country, with 48 million people jammed into an area the size of Ohio, HyoJung says, "Our attitude is, 'How dare you waste that?' "

With such an upbringing, it's no surprise that HyoJung, now an urban designer in Washington, D.C., was "green" long before that term connoted "cool." She married fellow architect and conservation enthusiast Seth Garland last fall, and they bought a four-bedroom Capitol Hill townhouse that they decided to gut and make as green as green could get: from energy-saving light fixtures and appliances down to the framing, plumbing and insulation.

But going green, the couple are now discovering, can quickly land you in the red. Seth, 37, and HyoJung, 34, thought the job would take three months and cost $70,000, with them shouldering some of the work. Six months in, they now estimate it will cost twice that much in money and elbow grease.

Seth says he was "shocked" by the cost of some green upgrades. "I found a more efficient tank-less hot-water system for $1,500, but the contractor told me it would cost $6,000 to install it." They're working late into the night laying bathroom tile themselves to save money.

Meanwhile, they have drained most of their savings and can't afford to keep living in HyoJung's condo in Gallery Place and paying the mortgage on the new house too. They've even got a third place: a house Seth bought in nearby Silver Spring, Md. years ago that is now rented out.

All told, the couple hold three adjustable-rate mortgages that add up to more than $1 million on a combined salary of just under $120,000 - and in a real estate market that's only headed lower.

Plus, they're underfunded for retirement, with a mere $75,000 in tax-deferred accounts. "Their situation is very worrisome, absolutely," says Chuck Bender of the Financial Consulate in Lutherville, Md., who reviewed the couple's finances at Money's request. "They have very little margin for error."

The perfect place

HyoJung and Seth met three years ago at her architectural firm in Silver Spring, where he was a summer intern. He looked so young she was surprised to discover that he is almost four years her senior and already had a career as a litigator before studying architecture. Both were recovering from divorces and in no hurry to get involved again, but eventually Seth moved into her condo. Last spring, as they took an early Sunday morning walk near the Washington Monument, Seth dropped to one knee and pulled out a ring. It wasn't a complete surprise - knowing her strong tastes in design, he had already asked her to choose from several styles - but still, HyoJung burst into tears.

Hoping to start a family, they began looking for a larger home. In September, a few weeks before their wedding, they found a 1912 brick house with lovely bay windows and a basement they could convert into a rental apartment. At $550,000, it was about $75,000 more than they had planned to spend, but it had the advantage of being near several subway lines. They could get rid of their car. Seth, a big booster of mass transit, has helped design subway stations and light rail systems in Maryland and northern Virginia.

Taking on so much real estate debt came with risk, but Seth has had success renting out his house and HyoJung's family did well as property investors in Korea. And the new place offered a dream project. "From the very beginning," says HyoJung, "we said, 'Let's make it green.' "

Green takes a lot of green

The couple decided to turn one of the four upstairs bedrooms into a master bathroom. On the first floor they knocked down the walls to turn the living room, dining room and kitchen into one large, open space - both for aesthetic reasons and to allow cross-ventilation that will cut air-conditioning costs.

Some choices were obvious: They used studs from suppliers that employ sustainable timber-harvesting practices; applied spray-foam insulation on the underside of the roof to keep the attic cool in summer; installed energy-efficient compact fluorescent lighting; and sprang for argon-gas double-paned windows (at $400 each) for better insulation. For subflooring they opted for oriented strand board, made of wood scraps, instead of plywood. They sold their old doors, metal pipes and radiators to salvage yards and installed water-efficient toilets and faucets.

But they were dismayed to find out how much they couldn't afford. Seth had planned to install energy-efficient polyethylene tubing called PEX, but the plumbers who could work with the material would be too expensive. The couple had to settle for nonbiodegradable plastic pipes instead. They also had to give up radiant floor heating - tubes of hot water under the floor that can lower energy costs - because the insulation required would be too expensive.

Also scratched were a roof that would support a garden and keep the house cooler in summer, a $12,000 solar hot-water system and a solar electric system that would set them back at least $20,000 (costs only minimally off set by federal tax credits of $2,000 for each solar-powered system).

By April, Seth's $70,000 in savings from his days as a lawyer had evaporated, and the $25,000 it would cost to get the house into bare-bones living condition would just about wipe out the cash HyoJung had put away. Meanwhile, each month they couldn't move in and get a renter into her condo cost them another $2,000. The answer? Another loan. HyoJung took out a home-equity credit line on her condo.

With remodeling costs out of control, cherished green projects on hold plus an awful lot of mortgage debt, Seth and HyoJung sat down with a financial planner, an alternative-energy expert and a green remodeling consultant for advice about how they could become more green and more financially stable.

Sell Hyojung's condo

Being so highly leveraged has not only disrupted Seth and HyoJung's greening plans, it has also put them at serious financial risk, says Bender of the Financial Consulate. If one of their rental properties goes empty or unforeseen repairs crop up, they could easily slide into negative monthly cash flow.

The solution: sell HyoJung's condo - fast. A year ago it would probably have sold for $430,000, but its market value has dropped to $415,000 and is likely to continue falling, according to Tom Murphy of Long & Foster realtors. Selling Seth's house in Silver Spring makes less sense because it's rented and the couple may eventually move back to that family-oriented neighborhood and its good schools.

The condo sale should generate about $140,000 after HyoJung pays off her mortgage and credit line, and the proceeds could be used for several important purposes: They would allow the couple to diversify their holdings so they're not as dependent on real estate.

They can each fully fund Roth IRAs for this year ($10,000 total) and increase their combined 401(k) contributions for 2008 from $4,800 to $30,000. (With the condo expenses gone, that should be their goal in the future too.) Since they're young, Bender says, the couple can afford to be aggressive in their retirement accounts, with an all-stock-fund portfolio that includes international equities and natural resources.

At the same time, though, Bender wants them better protected in the short term. He suggests they pay off their $10,000 in credit-card debt, put $30,000 into an emergency fund and set aside another $20,000 that could be used to offset some of HyoJung's lost income if, as planned, she has a child and decides to stay home for a while.

Finally, they can put $25,000 toward completing the work that would make the house livable, which includes finishing the basement and master bathroom, as well as installing kitchen flooring and cabinets. That still leaves $20,000 for green renovations they had given up on.

Get greener

It's too late to do anything about the plastic plumbing and lack of radiant floor heating, but $20,000 would pay for several green improvements. Paul Wittemann, a solar power entrepreneur and certified energy auditor with Greenspring Energy of Towson, Md., suggests they start with a venting skylight ($2,000) over the second-floor landing, frequently a dark spot in older homes. That will create airflow to cool the house and will allow natural light into the second floor and staircase, reducing the need for electric lights during daytime.

Another $6,000 should go for a new boiler with an Energy Star rating. Seth and HyoJung had decided to save money by not replacing the existing boiler. But according to Bambi Tran, a green consultant with Sustainable Design Consulting of Silver Spring, that old boiler will end up costing them more in the long run. "The better Energy Star boilers could save them thousands of dollars in fuel consumption," she says, "and would be much better for the environment."

They would still have enough left over for a solar hot-water system. "That can produce 70% to 80% of their house's hot water, saving substantially on energy bills," says Wittemann.

Seth and HyoJung initially resisted the idea of a bunch of experts coming into their home and giving them advice about their area of expertise. But now they're glad they did. "And we thought we knew everything," says HyoJung.

The couple were also initially against selling the condo, hoping to weather the current downturn. Renting the place out proved harder than they thought, however, and HyoJung started getting nervous about covering all those mortgage payments. When an offer to buy the condo for $410,000 fell into their laps, they decided to take it. Bender was right, they realized, and it was a relief to know they could pay off their debts and fully fund their retirement accounts.

As for those green improvements they can now afford, "We're not running out today to buy all that stuff," says Seth. As of mid-April, the couple are still putting in long hours to make the house livable within a few weeks, when they expect the condo sale to close. "After we move in, we're going to take a little rest and regroup," Seth says with a chuckle. "Frankly, we're a little tired."  See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Monday, May 19, 2008

Fannie Mae: Housing prices to plummet as much as 25% - May. 20, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Fannie Mae's CEO told shareholders Tuesday that the housing market is "about halfway through" its crisis and home prices could fall as much as 25% before the worst is over.

The largest U.S. buyer and guarantor of home mortgages will be able to weather the downturn and expand its business, Fannie Mae's president and CEO, Daniel Mudd, said as he and other top executives faced shareholders at an annual meeting in New Orleans.

As Mudd spoke in New Orleans, a key Senate panel approved a $300 billion homeowner rescue plan to provide cheaper, government-backed mortgages to as many as 500,000 struggling borrowers. The legislation also includes tougher federal oversight of Fannie Mae and its smaller government-sponsored sibling, Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500).

Under a key concession to Republicans for backing the plan, the rescue would be financed with a share of the two companies' profits.

Fannie (FNM, Fortune 500) shares declined $1.20, or about 4%, to $27.75 in early afternoon trading Tuesday. Freddie's stock slipped 50 cents, or around 2%, to $26.51.

After posting a first-quarter loss of $2.2 billion amid rising mortgage defaults, Fannie Mae earlier this month cut its dividend and raised $7 billion in new capital by issuing new shares to shore up its finances. Federal regulators loosened the capital requirements of Fannie and Freddie, to enable them to play a bigger role to bolster the housing market.

Mudd said Tuesday the company expects U.S. home prices to fall as much as 25% from their highs of mid-2005. Losses for Washington-based Fannie Mae from defaulted mortgages are expected to worsen next year.

The housing market is in its most severe slump since the Depression, Mudd said, a crisis "which we're likely to be about halfway through right now." See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Housing affordability best in four years - May. 20, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- With prices crashing around the nation, home price affordability has improved dramatically in many U.S. cities.

As a result, 53.8% of all new and existing homes sold nationwide during the first three months of 2008 were affordable to families earning the median household income of $61,500, according to the latest Housing Opportunity Index released Tuesday by Wells Fargo and the National Association of Home Builders (NAHB).

That's up from 44% during the first three months of 2007 with home prices the most affordable they've been since the three month period that ended June 30, 2004.

"Three factors combined to substantially increase housing affordability," said NAHB president, Sandy Dunn, in a press release accompanying the report. "Mortgage rates returning to near the record low levels of a few years ago, a $2,500 rise in family income nationwide (from 2007 to 2008) and lower house prices."

Home prices dropped about 8% compared with a year ago, according to NAHB, but that doesn't mean that buyers are flocking back to the market.

"This measure can only take you so far in implications for the market," said Dave Seiders, NAHB's chief economist. "There're several factors that the index does not capture."

These include buyer expectations. Many are reluctant to act in falling markets. That sentiment can contribute to market overshoot, according to Seiders, in which prices fall lower than would be their logical bottom.

Richard DeKaser, who, as chief economist for national City Corp., runs his own affordability studies, pointed out that three main factors influence housing market trends: demographics, like more families moving into an area attracted by jobs; sentiment, the perception that the housing market is a good investment at any point in time; and affordability.

"While affordability is an important factor that will contribute to recovery of housing markets eventually," he said, "improved affordability is unlikely to lift markets out on its own."

Mortgage lenders playing hard to get

The index also fails to capture the tightening of lending standards, which has been quite dramatic during the past 12 months. The index presupposes constant lending standards.

But today, lenders are requiring much higher down payments, better financial documentation and higher credit scores than they did during the boom, cutting back on the number of potential buyers.

California has been particularly hard hit by a liquidity squeeze in jumbo loan markets. These mortgages of greater than the $417,000 cap limit that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae imposed (now temporarily raised to $729,250) are especially important to high-priced markets.

"Jumbo markets had essentially shut down, " said Seiders, "and many California markets depend on jumbo loans." These are getting a little easier to find but they still cost a full 1 to 1.5 percentage points higher than other loans.

That has helped make Los Angeles, the least affordable metro area in the United States, more affordable than last year. But still, despite much lower home prices, to a median $412,000 from $525,000, only a little more than 10% of homes sold during the first quarter of 2008 were priced low enough so that households earning the median income of $59,800 in the area could buy.

That, however, is a change from a year ago when only 3% of Los Angeles area homes sold were affordable to the average Joe.

The affordability improvement was even greater for Santa Ana in Orange County, Calif. Helped by a median price drop to $470,000 from $610,000 a year ago there, 17.4% of homes sold were affordable, up from 4.4% during the first three months of 2007.

In San Diego, home affordability rose to 25.2% from 9.4% as prices dropped to $368,000 from $460,000; in Riverside, Calif. affordability went to 26.9% from 9.7% as prices fell to $288,000 from $380,000; and in Stockton, Calif., it soared to 35.5% from 9.7% as prices cratered to $262,000 from 390,000.

Outside the Golden State

The least affordable big city outside California was the New York metro area. There, nearly flat prices - $490,000 this year compared with $500,000 last, led to an increase in affordability to 12.5% this year. Still, that's better than a year ago, when only 6% of homes sold were affordable. New York is the second least affordable area according to this survey.

As has held true for several years, most of the affordable big cities were in the Midwest with Indianapolis leading the way. Homes sold there during the first three months cost about $106,000, down from $116,000 last year and 90.1% of all households living there earned enough to buy a median priced home, up from 89% last year.

Other affordable big cities include Youngstown, Ohio, where a median home price of $75,000 (down from $78,000) makes 89.5% of homes sold affordable; Grand Rapids, Mich,. where 88.7% of homes sold were affordable (up from 84.5%) and Detroit, where 86.9% of homes were affordable, a statistic that actually fell from a year ago when 87.4% of homes sold were affordable.

Although home affordability improved to its best level since mid-2004, Seiders is not predicting a market turnaround anytime soon.

According to him, with job growth slowing, negative consumer sentiment and tight mortgage lending standards, it could be a while before real estate markets start climbing again.

He's predicting that housing starts won't turn upward until early 2009, that home sales will be flat through mid-2009 and that home prices will fall another 10% or so beginning to recover in late '09. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Senate panel to OK mortgage aid

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The Senate Banking Committee is poised Tuesday to pass a housing bill that the panel's leader believes will garner a strong bipartisan vote and be signed into law by July.

The bill would prevent foreclosures, create affordable housing and revamp oversight of two of the mortgage market's biggest players: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

The legislation that lawmakers will vote on is the result of weeks of heated negotiations between Banking Committee Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and the committee's top Republican, Ranking Member Richard Shelby, R-Ala.

"Everyone can claim a victory," Dodd said Monday evening. "I'm hopeful we'll see a strong vote."

The deal came as pressure has been building in Washington to respond to the huge increases in foreclosure filings.

A key measure in the bill would allow the Federal Housing Administration to insure $300 billion in new loans for at-risk borrowers if lenders agree to write down loan balances below the appraised value of borrowers' homes.

"This legislation is good news for both the markets and homeowners," Dodd said in a statement. "The bill addresses the root of our current economic problems - the foreclosure crisis - by creating a voluntary initiative at no estimated cost to taxpayers which will help Americans keep their homes."

A key sticking point has been Shelby's push to shield taxpayers if borrowers default on their payments after getting government-backed loans. He has said that he wants the FHA plan funded by redirecting money that Dodd's original bill earmarked for a new affordable housing trust fund. The funds would be paid by Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500).

"My primary consideration ... has been to protect the American taxpayer, and I believe we've made significant progress toward that goal," Shelby said in a statement.

Dodd said Monday that the compromise bill would still create a fund to spur affordable housing but would use the funding for that program in the first year to backstop the FHA mortgage program.

The new FHA program could benefit an estimated 500,000 people, according to Dodd. It could cost as much as $500 million, which would be paid for by Fannie and Freddie. If it turns out the costs fall below that level - that is, should few if any borrowers default on their new FHA loans - the funds from Fannie and Freddie would be redirected back to the affordable housing trust fund.

Regulating the big boys

Another big issue in the legislation is a measure that would provide for stricter oversight of Fannie and Freddie. The two government-sponsored enterprises guarantee the purchase and sale of home mortgages in the secondary market.

Shelby had been campaigning for more stringent safeguards than Dodd's original bill provided. Both Fannie and Freddie have experienced accounting scandals in the past and both saw steep first-quarter losses.

The Banking Committee is scheduled to debate and vote on the bill Tuesday. The measure is certain to pass at the committee level and Dodd said he is hopeful he can get the votes he needs to pass the bill through the full Senate in time to go to President Bush before the July 4 congressional recess.

It remains an open question whether Bush would support the bill. He has threatened to veto a similar bill sponsored by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and passed by the House on May 8 by a 266-154 vote. But Dodd said that while the White House hasn't endorsed his bill yet, "there's been some positive reaction out of the White House."

A spokesman for Frank said the congressman was pleased a compromise had been reached. "We look forward to working with them," he said.

- With additional reporting from CNN Producer Lesa Jansen See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Dodd, Shelby reach housing aid deal - May. 19, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Senate Banking Committee leaders said Monday that they have come to a deal on a housing bill that would prevent foreclosures, create affordable housing and revamp oversight of two of the mortgage market's biggest players: Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac.

A major part of the legislation would allow the Federal Housing Administration to insure $300 billion in new loans for at-risk borrowers if lenders agree to write down loan balances below the appraised value of borrowers' homes.

The deal was struck between the top Democrat and Republican on the Banking Committee: Chairman Christopher Dodd, D-Conn., and Ranking Member Richard Shelby, R-Ala.

"This legislation is good news for both the markets and homeowners," Dodd said in a statement. "The bill addresses the root of our current economic problems - the foreclosure crisis - by creating a voluntary initiative at no estimated cost to taxpayers which will help Americans keep their homes."

Dodd and Shelby had been in prolonged negotiations over the bill.

A key sticking point has been Shelby's push to shield taxpayers if borrowers default on their payments after getting government-backed loans. He has said that he wants the FHA plan funded by redirecting money that Dodd's original bill earmarked for a new affordable housing trust fund. The funds would be paid by Fannie Mae (FNM, Fortune 500) and Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500).

"My primary consideration ... has been to protect the American taxpayer, and I believe we've made significant progress toward that goal," Shelby said in a statement.

Dodd said Monday that the compromise bill would still create a fund to spur affordable housing but would use the funding for that program in the first year to backstop the FHA mortgage program.

The new FHA program could benefit an estimated 500,000 people. It could cost as much as $500 million, which would be paid for by Fannie and Freddie. If it turns out the costs fall below that level - that is, should few if any borrowers default on their new FHA loans - the funds from Fannie and Freddie would be redirected back to the affordable housing trust fund.

Regulating the big boys

Another big issue in the legislation is a measure that would provide for stricter oversight of Fannie and Freddie. The two government-sponsored enterprises guarantee the purchase and sale of home mortgages in the secondary market.

Shelby had been campaigning for more stringent safeguards than Dodd's original bill provided. Both Fannie and Freddie have experienced accounting scandals in the past and both saw steep first-quarter losses.

The Banking Committee is scheduled to debate and vote on the bill Tuesday. The measure is certain to pass at the committee level and Dodd said he is hopeful he can get the votes he needs to pass the bill through the full Senate in time to go to President Bush before the July 4 congressional recess.

It remains an open question whether Bush would support the bill. He has threatened to veto a similar bill sponsored by Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., and passed by the House several weeks ago. But Dodd said that while the White House hasn't endorsed his bill yet, "there's been some positive reaction out of the White House."

A spokesman for Frank said the congressman was pleased a compromise had been reached. "We look forward to working with them," he said.

- With additional reporting from CNN Producer Lesa Jansen See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Sunday, May 18, 2008

So. California home sales jump 22%

SAN DIEGO (AP) -- Home sales surged 22% in April in Southern California as bargain-hunters bought lower-end homes in areas hardest hit by foreclosures, a research firm said Monday.

Sales of new and resale homes and condos reached 15,615 in April, up from 12,808 in March and the highest monthly total since August, according to DataQuick Information Systems.

The monthly increase of 22% in the six-county region is well above the average gain of only 1.2% from March to April since DataQuick began keeping statistics in 1988.

Homes under $500,000 accounted for two-thirds of the monthly gain, DataQuick said. Riverside County, which the firm calls the "epicenter" of foreclosures and price declines in Southern California, posted the region's only annual sales increase, its first in two years.

"Quite a few more buyers stepped off the sidelines last month to snap up homes at substantial discounts relative to the market's short-lived peak," said DataQuick President Marshall Prentice.

Foreclosures drew buyers, according to DataQuick. Nearly 38% of homes resold in April were in foreclosure at some point during the previous 12 months, compared to 36% in March and only 5% in April 2007. In Riverside County, foreclosures accounted for 53% of resale homes sold.

April's median home price in Southern California was $385,000, down 24% from $505,000 in April 2007.

Despite the sales surge since March, April sales were down 19% from 19,269 in the same period last year, marking the weakest April tally since 1995, DataQuick said.

"We continue to look for evidence of a sales bounce in the mid-priced and higher-end markets along the coast," Prentice said. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Maguire directors oust founder

LOS ANGELES (AP) -- Maguire Properties Inc. directors voted to oust company founder Robert F. Maguire III as the real estate investment trust's chief executive and chairman, officials announced Monday.

Board members voted to name former Maguire executive Nelson Rising as its new chief executive and to install board member Walter Weisman as company chairman, company officials said in a news release.

Maguire Properties (MPG) owns the US Bank Tower in downtown Los Angeles, the tallest building on the West Coast, and dozens of other major properties in the region.

"I look forward to working with our team to navigate our near-term challenges and best position the company for the future," Rising, who gained prominence as chief executive of Denver-based developer Catellus Corp., said in the release.

The Maguire board also voted Saturday to suspend the quarterly dividend on its common stock, the company said.

Company shares were up 5 cents to $15.25 in morning trading Monday.

Maguire Properties also announced Monday that Maguire, who stepped down from the company's board and was named chairman emeritus, had withdrawn his proposal to acquire control of the company. The 73-year-old reportedly was pursuing a deal to buy part of his company as recently as late last week.

Maguire spokeswoman Peggy Moretti did not immediately return a call seeking comment.

The company describes itself the largest commercial real estate developer and owner in downtown Los Angeles.

But its poor performance in recent months has led to a power struggle, with some major investors disparaging the role played by Maguire and demanding better financial performance.

The company has long underperformed its office peers and lost many tenants in its Orange County properties that were involved in the subprime mortgage industry.

Maguire Properties also has been criticized for spending $2.8 billion to buy a portfolio of 24 office buildings in Los Angeles and Orange County in February 2007.

In December, the board of directors created a special committee chaired by Weisman to consider alternatives, including the sale of the company.

The company rebuffed an offer from Maguire in late April to buy three-quarters of the firm's assets. But he still reportedly was talking to his partner in the proposed deal, Brookfield Properties Corp., as recently as Thursday.

Brookfield spokeswoman Melissa Coley declined to comment Monday.

Maguire, who has been developing office buildings since 1966, welcomed Rising's return to the company in the news statement.

"He was a valued partner of mine before and is an exceptional executive," he said. "I am very enthused to have him taking over for me." See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Top 100 markets forecast: Where home prices are headed next - May. 7, 2008

The housing implosion is nowhere near over. In 75 of the 100 top U.S. cities, prices are expected to fall in the next 12 months according to Fiserv Lending Solutions.

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Home prices continue sharp descent - May. 13, 2008


NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Single-family home prices dropped 7.7% in the first quarter in the largest year-over-year decline since the National Association of Realtors began reporting prices in 1982.


The median sales price fell to $196,300, down 4.8% compared with the last three months of 2007.


Lawrence Yun, the chief economist of NAR, attributed much of the record decline to liquidity problems dragging down high-priced markets.


"These are highly unusual results because there were very few jumbo loan originations in the latest quarter," he said. "So sales are much slower in high-cost areas."


Jumbo mortgages skew results


That sales slowdown changed the mix of houses sold.


In California, according to Yun, homes bought with jumbo mortgages - more than $417,000 - accounted for 40% of all sales before liquidity for these loans dried up during the summer of 2007. Since then only 10% of sales in California involved jumbo loans.


In February, Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae, the government sponsored enterprises that guarantee a market for conforming loans, have raised the $417,000 cap to include mortgages of up to $729,750, but lenders were still charging much higher rates for these "conforming jumbos," between 1% and 1.5% more than ordinary conforming loans. The higher rates are discouraging sales in higher price ranges and so skewed NAR's median price results.


Many of these same markets were also among the hardest hit by the subprime implosion, which forced many lower priced homes back on the markets, again dragging down NAR's results.


That helped put many California and other Sun Belt cities, with their toxic combinations of both high prices and heavy proportions of subprime mortgages, among the biggest losers.


In California, Sacramento prices plummeted 29.2% to $258,500 compared with last year and Riverside prices fell 27.7% to $287,100. Prices in Las Vegas fell 20.2% to $247,600 and those in Phoenix dropped 15.4% to $222,200.


Some Midwestern cities, hard hit by factory closings, also suffered huge losses with Lansing, Mich., prices falling 26.9%. Saginaw, Mich., had the lowest median prices of any of the 150 markets studied; a median house in Saginaw sold for just $65,400.


"You have two themes: the weak industrial economies under increasing pressure by struggles of the Big Three automakers and the deflating of what were once the most prominent bubble markets," said Michael Youngblood, an analyst with FBR Investment Management.


About of a third of the markets did show gains. The best performer in the nation was Binghamton, N.Y., where prices rose 11.8% to $109,700. Then came Peoria, Ill., up 10.4% to $119,000 and Spartanburg, S.C., where prices rose 10.2% to $130,300.


Regionally, in the Northeast, single-family home prices rose slightly, 3.2% to $280,000. But prices in the South dropped 7.5% to $164,200, in the Midwest they fell 7.9% to $142,700 and in the West they plunged 12.3% to $296,300.


Foreclosures put more homes in play


Hurting home prices were big rises in foreclosure rates over the past 12 months, which threaten to get even worse. Delinquencies more than doubled over that time and more than 155,000 lost their homes in bank repossessions during the first three months of the year. With many adjustable rate mortgages (ARMs) poised to reset this year to higher interest rates, defaults could go even higher.


"Yes, but I hasten to say it's not merely the ARMs," said Youngblood. "Fixed rate loans are performing poorly as well."


All that foreclosure activity added to the glut of homes on the market. The total inventory has risen to an average of 10 months worth of unsold homes. In addition, a record number - 2.9 million - of vacant homes are up for sale, according to the Census Bureau.


The big inventory has led to aggressive price slashing and increased incentives by builders looking to sell homes. They've also cut way back on housing starts, which are at a 17-year low.


The pace of existing home sales, at about 492,000 a month, is about a third less than its peak during the summer of 2005.


Condo prices fared a bit better than single-family homes. The median price fell just 3% since early 2007. The worst hit market was the Sarasota area, where condos dropped 35% over the past 12 months to $268,500. Sacramento condo price cratered 33.4% to $147,200. In Miami, prices fell 26.4% to $176,100.


The best performing condo market was about as far from the madding crowds of South Beach as one can get: Bismarck, N.D., condo prices soared 36.4% compared with 12 months ago, to $124,900.


The price declines in falling markets may not have run their course. Some analysts point to low home prices in many Midwestern cities and assert there's not much room for prices to fall but Youngblood disagrees.


"If we'd had this discussion a year ago, we would have said the same thing - how much further can they fall?" he said. "But jobs are declining and people are moving out and you're getting sharper home price declines than you ordinarily would."


Also, according to Youngblood, the sheer volume of foreclosures takes a toll. "Recent studies report that foreclosed properties sell for an average of 20% less than comparable properties that have not been foreclosed on," he said.


As for the bubble markets that have already lost 30% of their values, Youngblood thinks their declines are not over. He expects some to drop another 20% or so through February 2009. 


See Also:


[Via Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News]