Thursday, January 31, 2008

Construction spending drops by record 2.6%

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Construction spending fell by a record 2.6% in 2007 - mostly reflecting record cutbacks in home-building projects by private companies.

Private companies last year slashed residential projects by 18.3%, the largest drop on records dating back to 1993, the Commerce Department reported Friday. Such spending was flat in 2006 and was up by 13.5% in 2005.

The new figures were the latest evidence of the damage wrought by the housing bust.

The 2.6% drop in total construction spending by both private builders and government last year came after a 5.3 % increase in 2006 and a 10.6% jump in 2005, the department said.

The previous record drop in total construction spending was 1% in 2002. The previous record decline in spending by private builders on housing projects was 4.3% in 1994.

For the month of December, construction spending dropped 1.1%, the most in 15 months.


The decline was twice as big as the 0.5 % drop economists were forecasting. The 1.1 % decline followed a 0.4% decrease in November.

The weakness was led by a 2.8% decline in spending by private builders on housing projects. That came after a 3% decline in November and marked the 22nd consecutive monthly decline in such spending, underscoring the problems builders are facing.

The housing bust has led to sagging sales and weak home prices. Harder-to-get credit has thwarted some would-be home buyers, adding to a pileup of unsold homes. Builders have cut back on new building projects as they try to get rid of the backlog. They also have sweetened the pot, offering various incentives to lure buyers.

Government reduced spending on a range of building projects in December, slicing spending on public works projects by 1.5% in December. That compared with a 1.3 % rise in November.

There was a bit of a bright spot in the December report: Spending by private builders on commercial projects, such as office buildings, rose 1.3% after a 1.8% increase in November. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Construction spending drop largest since at least 1994 - Feb. 1, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Construction spending fell by a record 2.6% in 2007 - mostly reflecting record cutbacks in home-building projects by private companies.

Private companies last year slashed residential projects by 18.3%, the largest drop on records dating back to 1993, the Commerce Department reported Friday. Such spending was flat in 2006 and was up by 13.5% in 2005.

The new figures were the latest evidence of the damage wrought by the housing bust.

The 2.6% drop in total construction spending by both private builders and government last year came after a 5.3 % increase in 2006 and a 10.6% jump in 2005, the department said.

The previous record drop in total construction spending was 1% in 2002. The previous record decline in spending by private builders on housing projects was 4.3% in 1994.

For the month of December, construction spending dropped 1.1%, the most in 15 months.


The decline was twice as big as the 0.5 % drop economists were forecasting. The 1.1 % decline followed a 0.4% decrease in November.

The weakness was led by a 2.8% decline in spending by private builders on housing projects. That came after a 3% decline in November and marked the 22nd consecutive monthly decline in such spending, underscoring the problems builders are facing.

The housing bust has led to sagging sales and weak home prices. Harder-to-get credit has thwarted some would-be home buyers, adding to a pileup of unsold homes. Builders have cut back on new building projects as they try to get rid of the backlog. They also have sweetened the pot, offering various incentives to lure buyers.

Government reduced spending on a range of building projects in December, slicing spending on public works projects by 1.5% in December. That compared with a 1.3 % rise in November.

There was a bit of a bright spot in the December report: Spending by private builders on commercial projects, such as office buildings, rose 1.3% after a 1.8% increase in November. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Beazer closing doors on mortgage business

ATLANTA (AP) -- Homebuilder Beazer Homes USA Inc. said Friday it will no longer originate mortgages and will offer its buyers mortgage services through Countrywide Financial Corp.

The Atlanta-based company also released preliminary first quarter operating data, and it said it will stop building homes in several communities.

Mortgage origination services through Beazer Mortgage Corp. will end immediately and the company said it has ended a related mortgage services relationship with Homebuilders Financial Network, LLC.

The company will instead market Countrywide as the preferred mortgage provider to customers.

Beazer will pull out of Charlotte, N.C.; areas around Cincinnati, Columbus and Dayton, Ohio; Columbia, S.C.; and Lexington, Ky. A timetable for the exit in those markets was not specified.


As of June 30, 2007, roughly 5% of the company's homebuilding assets were invested in those markets.

As for its financials, Beazer Homes said it currently expects its results for the first quarter of fiscal 2008 to include material charges to abandon land option contracts and to recognize inventory impairments. It did not quantify the amounts because of plans to restate results from prior years.

The company also reiterated that home closings for its quarter ended Dec. 31 totaled 2,010, a 24% decline from the same period in the prior fiscal year. Net new home orders totaled 1,260, a decline of 29% from the prior fiscal year. The company saw a 46% cancellation rate in the quarter.

The company has said it would restate financials for a three-year period after an internal probe found employees in its mortgage origination unit violated federal lending rules. The company has said it received a subpoena from the United States Attorney's office in the Western District of North Carolina seeking documents related to the mortgage service.

Beazer previously disclosed that its former chief accounting officer may have inflated reserves and other accrued liabilities in earlier periods.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has launched a formal investigation of Beazer to determine whether any person or entity related to the company violated federal securities laws.

A shareholder advisory group has since urged Beazer's board to fire Chief Executive Ian McCarthy. The board has not complied.

Beazer has been beset by turmoil in the housing industry that has caused its number of home closings to plunge. It cut 650 jobs, or 25% of its work force, in October, and suspended its quarterly dividend.

Beazer (BZH, Fortune 500) shares lost 3% in morning trading Friday. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

New $20B subprime bailout on the table

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A proposal to bail out subprime mortgage borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure was floated at a Senate Banking Committee hearing Thursday.

Senator Chris Dodd, the committee chair, said he is working to create a Home Ownership Preservation Corporation, which would purchase mortgage securities that are backed by at-risk, subprime loans from lenders and investors.

This corporation would give these lenders and investors a better price for the securities than they would get if the properties backing them were put through foreclosure.

Additionally the loans on these properties would be restructured so that borrowers could afford the new payments and remain in their homes.

Lesser of two evils

Although economists believe that the mortgage backed securities would sell at a steep discount to their original values, they contend that the investors would still recoup more of their outlay this way, rather than going through the expensive foreclosure process.

Borrowers could see their monthly costs drop dramatically.

According to today's testimony, the fund might require $20 -$25 billion in seed money from taxpayers and, after that, it should self-fund.

Dodd said his proposal is supported by both ends of the ideological spectrum. He pointed out that two of the witnesses testifying on Thursday in support of this bailout - Michael Barr, from the progressive Center for American Progress, and Alex Pollack, with the conservative American Enterprise Institute - are usually on the opposite side of economic issues.

But there was dissent from members of the Banking Committee. Senator Bunning, R-Ky., said "Government meddling could make matters worse."

Senator Bob Corker, R-Tenn., was concerned about the "moral hazard" of rewarding borrowers' risky behavior.

A big step

Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, suggested a plan similar to Dodd's in early December, and agrees that it's a big and very complicated step. "But we have to prepare for the possibility that something like this will be necessary," he said.

And he contended that any bailout must be made with taxpayer money. "It has to have the triple A credit of the United States backing it," he said.

The biggest problem facing housing currently is that the market is frozen, according to Zandi, because investors who buy mortgage-backed securities have abandoned that market. That's created a liquidity squeeze which has made it difficult for even well-qualified borrowers to obtain a loan.

Zandi thinks the fund should buy existing moorage-backed securities in an auction-type process, which would immediately establish what those securities are really worth.

"As soon as there's a price [for the securities], there's a market," Zandi said. "Everyone can then start appropriately valuing what's on their books."

Jared Bernstein, an economist with the Economic Policy Institute, a progressive, Washington-based think-tank, agrees.

"Auctioning the debt to discover its true price might be ugly but it's the way to go," he said. "You can't hit bottom until transparency is back in the system and this will help bring it back."

Bernstein added that such a plan is not unprecedented. "There's a long history of the government providing precisely this kind of help for people facing foreclosure," he said.

There are currently several government-backed efforts underway to combat the housing crisis.

The stimulus package now before Congress would raise the caps on loans that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae can purchase in the secondary markets to create more liquidity, while a hike in FHA caps would do the same. Meanwhile,Federal Reserve has moved swiftly to cut interest rates, which will also put more money into credit markets.

"All these efforts may not be enough," said Zandi. "[But this bailout] will cost taxpayers a lot less money than leaving the market in a deep freeze." See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

New subprime bailout on the table - Jan. 31, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A proposal to bail out subprime mortgage borrowers who are at risk of foreclosure was floated at a Senate Banking Committee hearing Thursday.

Senator Chris Dodd, the committee chair, said he is working to create a Home Ownership Preservation Corporation, which would purchase mortgage securities that are backed by at-risk, subprime loans from lenders and investors.

This corporation would give these lenders and investors a better price for the securities than they would get if the properties backing them were put through foreclosure.

Additionally the loans on these properties would be restructured so that borrowers could afford the new payments and remain in their homes.

Lesser of two evils

Although economists believe that the mortgage backed securities would sell at a steep discount to their original values, they contend that the investors would still recoup more of their outlay this way, rather than going through the expensive foreclosure process.

Borrowers could see their monthly costs drop dramatically.

According to today's testimony, the fund might require $20 -$25 billion in seed money from taxpayers and, after that, it should self-fund.

Dodd said his proposal is supported by both ends of the ideological spectrum. He pointed out that two of the witnesses testifying on Thursday in support of this bailout - Michael Barr, from the progressive Center for American Progress, and Alex Pollack, with the conservative American Enterprise Institute - are usually on the opposite side of economic issues.

But there was dissent from members of the Banking Committee. Senator Bunning, R-Ky., said "Government meddling could make matters worse."

Senator Bob Corker, R-Tenn., was concerned about the "moral hazard" of rewarding borrowers' risky behavior.

A big step

Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, suggested a plan similar to Dodd's in early December, and agrees that it's a big and very complicated step. "But we have to prepare for the possibility that something like this will be necessary," he said.

And he contended that any bailout must be made with taxpayer money. "It has to have the triple A credit of the United States backing it," he said.

The biggest problem facing housing currently is that the market is frozen, according to Zandi, because investors who buy mortgage-backed securities have abandoned that market. That's created a liquidity squeeze which has made it difficult for even well-qualified borrowers to obtain a loan.

Zandi thinks the fund should buy existing moorage-backed securities in an auction-type process, which would immediately establish what those securities are really worth.

"As soon as there's a price [for the securities], there's a market," Zandi said. "Everyone can then start appropriately valuing what's on their books."

Jared Bernstein, an economist with the Economic Policy Institute, a progressive, Washington-based think-tank, agrees.

"Auctioning the debt to discover its true price might be ugly but it's the way to go," he said. "You can't hit bottom until transparency is back in the system and this will help bring it back."

Bernstein added that such a plan is not unprecedented. "There's a long history of the government providing precisely this kind of help for people facing foreclosure," he said.

There are currently several government-backed efforts underway to combat the housing crisis.

The stimulus package now before Congress would raise the caps on loans that Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae can purchase in the secondary markets to create more liquidity, while a hike in FHA caps would do the same. Meanwhile,Federal Reserve has moved swiftly to cut interest rates, which will also put more money into credit markets.

"All these efforts may not be enough," said Zandi. "[But this bailout] will cost taxpayers a lot less money than leaving the market in a deep freeze." See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Florida investigates Countrywide

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) -- Florida's attorney general is investigating Countrywide Financial, a beleaguered California-based mortgage lender, for possible unfair and deceptive business practices related to its home loans.

The subpoena, dated Jan. 17, directs Countrywide to provide documents and other information describing procedures used to determine whether borrowers qualify for subprime loans, those for people with shaky credit.

The state also wants information on how Countrywide credited borrowers' payments any time after January 2005. It also asks for documents that track applications of borrowers' payments to bankruptcy debt and a description of fees charged to mortgage holders during the same period.

"We've had a number of complaints about Countrywide, as well as other mortgage companies in the subprime arena," Attorney General Bill McCollum told reporters Thursday. "[The complaints involve] how some of their business was conducted in terms of marketing and in terms of advertising."


McCollum is also interested in how Countrywide conducts itself with borrowers who find themselves in trouble. He said he was interested in comments made by several bankruptcy judges concerning how the company treats people seeking relief.

The attorney general's office started a mortgage fraud hot line last year. It has received about 150 complaints on Countrywide.

Countrywide, based in Calabasas, Calif., has until Feb. 11 to provide the information. Countrywide officials did not immediately return a phone call Thursday.

Attorneys general in Illinois and California are conducting similar investigations.

McCollum said he is also investigating other mortgage companies but has not filed any other subpoenas yet.

Countrywide, like many in the mortgage industry, has suffered under the weight of the subprime fallout as thousands of customers default on home loans. Many experts criticize companies like Countrywide for relaxing lending standards and contributing to the meltdown.

Earlier this month, Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) agreed to pay $4.1 billion in stock for Countrywide.

Countrywide (CFC, Fortune 500) shares were up 30 cents at $6.77 in midday trading Thursday. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Florida investigates Countrywide subprime lending practices - Jan. 31, 2008

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. (AP) -- Florida's attorney general is investigating Countrywide Financial, a beleaguered California-based mortgage lender, for possible unfair and deceptive business practices related to its home loans.

The subpoena, dated Jan. 17, directs Countrywide to provide documents and other information describing procedures used to determine whether borrowers qualify for subprime loans, those for people with shaky credit.

The state also wants information on how Countrywide credited borrowers' payments any time after January 2005. It also asks for documents that track applications of borrowers' payments to bankruptcy debt and a description of fees charged to mortgage holders during the same period.

"We've had a number of complaints about Countrywide, as well as other mortgage companies in the subprime arena," Attorney General Bill McCollum told reporters Thursday. "[The complaints involve] how some of their business was conducted in terms of marketing and in terms of advertising."


McCollum is also interested in how Countrywide conducts itself with borrowers who find themselves in trouble. He said he was interested in comments made by several bankruptcy judges concerning how the company treats people seeking relief.

The attorney general's office started a mortgage fraud hot line last year. It has received about 150 complaints on Countrywide.

Countrywide, based in Calabasas, Calif., has until Feb. 11 to provide the information. Countrywide officials did not immediately return a phone call Thursday.

Attorneys general in Illinois and California are conducting similar investigations.

McCollum said he is also investigating other mortgage companies but has not filed any other subpoenas yet.

Countrywide, like many in the mortgage industry, has suffered under the weight of the subprime fallout as thousands of customers default on home loans. Many experts criticize companies like Countrywide for relaxing lending standards and contributing to the meltdown.

Earlier this month, Bank of America (BAC, Fortune 500) agreed to pay $4.1 billion in stock for Countrywide.

Countrywide (CFC, Fortune 500) shares were up 30 cents at $6.77 in midday trading Thursday. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Many unaware of mortgage help: Freddie Mac

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- More than half of borrowers who have missed mortgage payment deadlines are still in the dark about ways to avoid foreclosure, but that percentage is falling, said a survey released Thursday.

Research from government mortgage buyer Freddie Mac and marketing research firm Roper Public Affairs and Media said that 57% of late-paying borrowers are unaware of foreclosure alternatives offered by their lenders.

That percentage was down from the 61% reported in the first Freddie Mac/Roper survey in 2005.

"Efforts to get borrowers to call lenders and counselors are starting to work," said Ingrid Beckles, Freddie Mac's VP of Servicing and Asset Management.

But, she added, "Too many at-risk borrowers are still unaware their servicers routinely provide alternatives."

Both the percentage of delinquent borrowers who contacted their lenders and the percentage who said their lenders had contacted them have increased since 2005, Freddie Mac said. But while 59% said their communication was helpful, nearly a fourth said the contact was "intimidating" or "confusing."

Beckles pointed out that delinquent borrowers should proactively call their servicers, firms that collect payments for firms such as Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500), to learn what they can do to avoid foreclosure.

The survey also found increased awareness of foreclosure avoidance strategies such as repayment plans, adjustable to fixed rate mortgage conversions, and lump sum payments.

Borrowers are less likely to turn to lenders and financial institutions for foreclosure information, and increasingly go to friends, family, and the Internet, said the report.

More than half of those surveyed still talk to their bank or mortgage lender first, a statistic unchanged since 2005, but a large percentage said those institutions are a pain to deal with. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Freddie Mac survey: Awareness of foreclosure help still dim - Jan. 31, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- More than half of borrowers who have missed mortgage payment deadlines are still in the dark about ways to avoid foreclosure, but that percentage is falling, said a survey released Thursday.

Research from government mortgage buyer Freddie Mac and marketing research firm Roper Public Affairs and Media said that 57% of late-paying borrowers are unaware of foreclosure alternatives offered by their lenders.

That percentage was down from the 61% reported in the first Freddie Mac/Roper survey in 2005.

"Efforts to get borrowers to call lenders and counselors are starting to work," said Ingrid Beckles, Freddie Mac's VP of Servicing and Asset Management.

But, she added, "Too many at-risk borrowers are still unaware their servicers routinely provide alternatives."

Both the percentage of delinquent borrowers who contacted their lenders and the percentage who said their lenders had contacted them have increased since 2005, Freddie Mac said. But while 59% said their communication was helpful, nearly a fourth said the contact was "intimidating" or "confusing."

Beckles pointed out that delinquent borrowers should proactively call their servicers, firms that collect payments for firms such as Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500), to learn what they can do to avoid foreclosure.

The survey also found increased awareness of foreclosure avoidance strategies such as repayment plans, adjustable to fixed rate mortgage conversions, and lump sum payments.

Borrowers are less likely to turn to lenders and financial institutions for foreclosure information, and increasingly go to friends, family, and the Internet, said the report.

More than half of those surveyed still talk to their bank or mortgage lender first, a statistic unchanged since 2005, but a large percentage said those institutions are a pain to deal with. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Wednesday, January 30, 2008

Mortgage rates end five-week descent

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Mortgage rates ended their five-week descent following the Fed's decision to cut its federal funds rate by half of a percentage point, Freddie Mac reported Thursday.

The government-sponsored loan buyer said the rate on a 30-year fixed-rate loan averaged 5.68% for the week ending Thursday, up from 5.48% last week, but still well below its historical average Freddie Mac noted.

At this time last year, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 6.34%, Freddie Mac said.

"Reinforcing the Fed's resolution to thwart a recession, the Federal Open Market Committee announced another cut in the target federal funds rate by half of a percentage point in their most recent scheduled meeting," said Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) vice president and chief economist Frank Nothaft in statement Thursday.

"This came on the heels of the Fed's rate cut of three-quarters of a percentage point the previous week, and the shaping-up of a fiscal stimulus package by Congress and the White House. This cut was in line with market expectations." he added.


Freddie Mac said 15-year fixed-rate loans averaged 5.17%, up from 4.95% last week. A year ago, the 15-year rate averaged 6.06%.

Rates on five-year adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 5.32%, up from 5.13% last week. The 5-year rate averaged 6.04% at this time last year.

One-year Treasury-indexed ARMs averaged 5.05%, up from 4.99% last week. At this time a year ago, the 1-year ARM averaged 5.54%.  See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Mortgage rates ended their five-week descent - Jan. 31, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Mortgage rates ended their five-week descent following the Fed's decision to cut its federal funds rate by half of a percentage point, Freddie Mac reported Thursday.

The government-sponsored loan buyer said the rate on a 30-year fixed-rate loan averaged 5.68% for the week ending Thursday, up from 5.48% last week, but still well below its historical average Freddie Mac noted.

At this time last year, the 30-year fixed-rate mortgage averaged 6.34%, Freddie Mac said.

"Reinforcing the Fed's resolution to thwart a recession, the Federal Open Market Committee announced another cut in the target federal funds rate by half of a percentage point in their most recent scheduled meeting," said Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) vice president and chief economist Frank Nothaft in statement Thursday.

"This came on the heels of the Fed's rate cut of three-quarters of a percentage point the previous week, and the shaping-up of a fiscal stimulus package by Congress and the White House. This cut was in line with market expectations." he added.


Freddie Mac said 15-year fixed-rate loans averaged 5.17%, up from 4.95% last week. A year ago, the 15-year rate averaged 6.06%.

Rates on five-year adjustable-rate mortgages (ARMs) averaged 5.32%, up from 5.13% last week. The 5-year rate averaged 6.04% at this time last year.

One-year Treasury-indexed ARMs averaged 5.05%, up from 4.99% last week. At this time a year ago, the 1-year ARM averaged 5.54%.  See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

How Congress set up the subprime mess - Jan. 31, 2008

(Fortune) -- Executives in Houston high-rises can rest easy. The mortgage industry has officially replaced Big Oil as Washington's favorite political punching bag.

But before our elected officials in Congress get too preachy about the lousy lending practices that led to today's mortgage mess, first they ought to consider Congress's own role in laying the groundwork.

The fact is, neither the expansion of the subprime market nor the proliferation of exotic interest-only or option-ARM mortgages would have been possible without federal laws passed in the 1980s.

Says Patricia McCoy, a law professor at the University of Connecticut: "Congress never likes to blame themselves, but in this case there's no question they bear some of the responsibility." Indeed, only now is Congress talking about enacting some tougher regulations that they could and should have pushed through 10 or 20 years ago.


McCoy points to two key pieces of legislation that are at the root of the current mortgage crisis: the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (DIDMCA) and the Alternative Mortgage Transactions Parity Act of 1982 (AMTPA).

The former abolished state usury caps that had limited the interest rates banks could charge on primary mortgages - and, in the process, gave banks more incentive to make home loans to folks with less-than-perfect credit.

Though DIDMCA did eventually open the door to some predatory lending in low-income communities, McCoy thinks that, on balance, the 1980 legislation was valuable in the way it deregulated the mortgage market and made home loans more available. It is AMTPA, the 1982 law, that McCoy sees as most problematic.

Prior to the passage of AMTPA, banks were barred from making anything but the conventional fixed-rate, amortizing mortgages. AMPTA lifted those restrictions, giving birth to all the new and exotic mortgages that have so many borrowers in hot water today. For instance:

  • Adjustable-rate mortgages, in which the interest rate becomes floating after a number of years.
  • Balloon-payment mortgages, which have an outsized payment when the loan comes due.
  • Interest-only mortgages, which require only repayment of interest (not principal too) during the first few years of the loan, only to hit borrowers with crushing monthly-payment resets once the new monthly payment kicks in.
  • And worst of all, the option-ARM, which allows borrowers to underpay by as much as they want during the first few years. The awful upshot is the unpaid monthly interest gets tacked onto the size of the loan. So your $300,000 mortgage can turn into a $350,000 loan in a hurry, destroying any equity you have in your home.

"One of the problems was that there were no substitute regulations to make sure these new mortgages didn't turn out to be exploitative," says McCoy.

Much of the grief being visited upon borrowers and lenders right now could have been avoided, she contends, if Congress had required that the underwriting standards on the new, adjustable-rate loans be applied not to the teaser rates but to the maximum rates.

"All of these adjustable rate mortgages have rate caps, so you figure out what the maximum the rate could be, and you underwrite to that number," she says. Had such rules been in effect a few years ago, far fewer people would have been allowed to take out mortgages they couldn't afford.

McCoy gives a bit of a pass to the 1982 Congress, as it would have been difficult for them to anticipate the growth of the subprime market (in 1982, it was hard for low-income people to get any mortgage) or the willingness of lenders to give interest-only mortgages to the borrowers in the worst position to afford such a loan. However, all the problems that are rampant today existed on a smaller scale in the 1990s, which is why McCoy faults the 1990s Congress for not acting at that time.

"Certainly by the late 1990s, Congress knew of the problems," says McCoy. "It had plenty of time over the past 10 years to do something, and it did nothing."

While it's too late for some borrowers and lenders, Congress does seem to understand what fixes are needed. An October, 2007 report put out by the Senate and House's Joint Economic Committee (which is chaired by U.S. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-NY), recommended that underwriting standards be tightened on adjustable-rate mortgages.

"At a minimum," reads the report, "the federal government should require lenders to determine that the borrower has the ability to repay a loan at the fully-indexed rate and assume fully amortized payments."

The House passed "The Mortgage Reform and Anti-Predatory Lending Act of 2007" in November, and the topic is now before the Senate. The House bill would require that mortgages be underwritten to standards that measure the borrowers' ability to pay at the fully-indexed rate.

Senate banking Committee chairman Chris Dodd introduced a Senate bill in December that includes a similar requirement. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Fired Worker Sues KB Home, Countrywide



NEW YORK (Associated Press) - A former employee of Countrywide KB Home Loans has filed a lawsuit claiming he was wrongly fired after he reported fraudulent lending practices to superiors and refused to approve mortgages for unqualified applicants.

The federal lawsuit was brought by Mark Zachary, a regional vice president and manager of the Countrywide KB Home Loans division in Houston.

He seeks unspecified compensatory and punitive damages against the joint venture of mortgage lender Countrywide Financial Corp. and builder KB Home.

The lending practices of Countrywide Financial and other mortgage companies have come under scrutiny amid a surge in home loan defaults among borrowers with poor credit histories. On Tuesday, Countrywide reported a fourth-quarter loss of $422 million after losing $1.2 billion in 2007's third quarter.

In the suit, Zachary contended he was given an excellent performance review last February then fired three months later after he blew the whistle on fellow employees and outlined instances in which appraisers were "being strongly encouraged to inflate homes' appraised value by as much as 6 percent."

That resulted in buyers owing more than their home was worth, Zachary claimed in the lawsuit filed Jan. 17 in U.S. District Court in the Southern District of Texas.

Los Angeles-based KB Home declined to comment because the litigation is pending.

Calabasas based Countrywide Financial said in a statement that it investigated each of Zachary's claims and found them to be meritless.

"Countrywide has policies and procedures in place that aim to prevent the type of activities Mr. Zachary is alleging," the company said.

The lender also denied that Zachary was fired due to the allegations he made in his lawsuit.

Among other allegations, Zachary claims Countrywide loan officers would advise applicants who were denied a prime-rate loan about what income level they should report so they could be approved for no-documentation or stated-income subprime loans.

Zachary said he was fired after he failed to meet a quota for new loan approvals because he refused to clear unqualified applicants, according to the complaint.

Countrywide shares rose 16 cents, or 2.5 percent, to $6.47 Wednesday. Shares of KB fell $1, or 3.8 percent, to 5.18. Top of page

See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Report: Housing affordability hasn't improved much - Jan. 30, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Despite the housing slump, most middle income workers still don't earn enough to buy a median-priced home in their hometowns, according to the Center for Housing Policy.

The center, an arm of the affordable housing advocacy group the National Housing Conference (NHC), compared housing costs in 201 metro areas with the median wages in those areas for 60 major vocations, like police, fireman and teachers.

Although home prices fell in 161 of those markets in the 12 months ending September 30, 2007 according to the study, home costs were still too high for typical working people in most markets.

In Chicago, for example, the median home sold for $262,000. Assuming that a buyer would put 10 percent down and had a spending ceiling of 28 percent of gross income for housing, they'd have to earn $85,589 to buy a home.

But registered nurses earned a median of only $63,938 in Chicago. Customer service representatives grossed a median of $39,876, office clerks $42,441, retail salespeople $23,056 and food service workers $21,786. For these people, home ownership remains far out of reach.

Home ownership in record drop

"We hear a lot about the 'information economy,' but most working families are still employed in traditional service occupations. In many metro areas, these families continue to face home prices and rents that are beyond their means, and as a result, employers have a difficult time attracting a quality workforce," said Jeffrey Lubell, executive director of the Center.

Nurses earning the profession's median wage could afford to buy a home in only 93 out of the 201 markets, according to the study That was an improvement over 2006 when they could afford to buy in only 87 markets.

Customer reps could afford median priced homes in 16 markets (up four from 2006) and office workers five (up three). Food prep workers and retail salespeople count afford to buy in any market.

To be sure, if the NHC study had covered the last three months of 2007, when prices fell even more, the affordability findings would have improved.

At the same time, mortgage interest rates have declined. In July, the 30-year fixed rate averaged 6.7 percent, according to Freddie Mac. Last week, it hit 5.48 percent, slashing mortgage payments by about $160 a month on a $200,000 loan.

"All the affordability components are moving in the right direction," said Walter Molony, spokesman for the National Association of Realtors. Indeed, NAR's own affordability index climbed to 122 in December from 103.6 in July.

Richard DeKaser, chief economist for National City Corp (NCC, Fortune 500)., who compiles his own statistics on home affordability would not dispute the findings that many housing markets remain unaffordable, but he asserted that, outside of 1994 through 2004, which he called the most affordable period for home prices in decades, housing today is relatively reasonable.

In the late 1970s and early 1980s, for example, when interest rates were sky high, it was a much harder to buy a home, according to DeKaser.

But Maya Brennan, a spokeswoman for the Center. said, "A drop in prices is not going to close the gap for most workers. Prices are not dropping that much." She adds that places where they are cratering, such as California, the drops are coming off very high peaks.

Even when possible, And even when home ownership is possible, Brennan said, it is still often very difficult for workers. "People are having to stretch their wages from paycheck to paycheck, make sacrifices or move farther out [from their jobs] to afford housing."

Davenport, Iowa saw the the biggest improvement in affordability. The median home price there plummeted from $124,900 to $87,000, according to data provided by the National Association of Home Builders. House price drop was the biggest ever

Other dramatic swings occurred in Merced, Calif., where median prices dropped 26.2 percent, nearby Stockton, which dipped 23.5 percent less and,Modesto down 23.1 percent.

The study also looked at rental affordability and the picture here was more positive. Nurses can afford the rent on a median-priced, two-bedroom apartment in every metro area; customer service reps could do so in all but 41 markets and office workers could rent in nearly half the areas surveyed.

Unfortunately, neither food service workers nor retail clerks who earned median salaries could afford the median rent for a two-bedroom in any of the 201 markets surveyed. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Mortgage application index rose last week - Jan. 30, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) -- Mortgage application volume rose 7.5% during the week ended Jan. 25, according to the trade group Mortgage Bankers Association's weekly application survey.

The MBA's application index rose to 1,054.9 from 981.5 the previous week.

Application volume was pushed higher by a jump in refinance volume. Refinance application volume increased 22.1%, while purchase volume tumbled 17.7%. Refinance applications accounted for 73% of total applications.

The index peaked at 1,856.7 during the week ending May 30, 2003, at the height of the housing boom.

An index value of 100 is equal to the application volume on March 16, 1990, the first week the MBA tracked application volume. A reading of 1,054.9 means mortgage application activity is 10.549 times higher than it was when the MBA began tracking the data.

The survey provides a snapshot of mortgage lending activity among mortgage bankers, commercial banks and thrifts. It covers about 50% of all residential retail mortgage originations each week.

Application volume rose despite an increase in interest rates. The average rate for traditional, 30-year fixed-rate mortgages rose to 5.6% from 5.49%. The average rate for 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, which are often used to refinance, rose to 5.04% from 4.95%.

Average rates for one-year adjustable rate mortgages increased to 5.7% from 5.51%. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Monday, January 28, 2008

Home ownership rate posts biggest annual drop on record - Jan. 29, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The housing and mortgage meltdown caused the biggest one-year drop in the rate of homeownership on record, according to government figures released Tuesday.

The Census Bureau report showed that home owners accounted for 67.8% of occupied homes in the fourth quarter, down 1.1 points from a year earlier. It's the largest year-over-year drop recorded in the report. The ownership rate was also well below the 68.2% ownership rate in the third quarter of 2007.

Homeownership rates, which have been tracked since 1965, hit a record high of 69.2% at the end of 2004.

The report also also showed a record 2.18 million homes vacant and available for sale in the fourth quarter, up from the 2.07 million in the third quarter and the 2.1 million a year earlier. The fourth-quarter reading on vacant homes for sale matched the previous record set in the first three months of 2007.

The report comes the same day that RealtyTrac, an online seller of foreclosure properties, reported that total foreclosure filings grew 75% in 2007 and S&P Case/Shiller, which tracks home values in the nation's largest markets, posted the biggest price decline on record its November reading.

The glut of vacant homes is a sign the evaporation of demand for home sales, which has hammered housing values. It also signals bad news for homebuilders, who were stuck with a record inventory of 195,000 completed homes at the end of December. A separate Census Bureau report Monday showed the biggest drop in new home sales on record in 2007.

Lennar (LEN, Fortune 500), the nation's largest builder by revenue, reported a company record $1.25 billion fourth-quarter loss on Thursday, as it was hit by both lower sales price, weak sales volume and hefty charges to write down land values. It had previously agreed to sell 11,000 properties to the real estate arm of Morgan Stanley (MS, Fortune 500) for only 40 percent of their previously estimated value.

Other top builders, including KB Home (KBH, Fortune 500) Centex (CTX, Fortune 500), D.R. Horton (DHI, Fortune 500) Pulte Homes (PHM, Fortune 500) and Hovnanian Enterprises (HOV, Fortune 500), are all expected to post losses through much of 2008. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Home price drop hits new record low

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The housing market is only getting worse, according to the latest report from S&P Case/Shiller released Tuesday.

Home prices were down 8.4 percent in November compared with last year in its 10-city index, a record low. The 20-city index also fell 7.7 percent.

The Case/Shiller report compares same-home sale prices. The industry considers it to be one of the most accurate snapshots of housing prices.

Previously, the largest year-over-year decline on record was 6.3 percent in April 1991. The November report marked the 11th consecutive month of negative returns for the index, and twenty-four months of decelerating returns.

"We reached another grim milestone in the housing market in November," said Robert Shiller, Chief Economist at MacroMarkets LLC and co-creator the index in a statement.

"Not only did the 10-city composite index post another record low in its annual growth rate, but 13 of the 20 metro areas, each with data back to 1991, did the same."

The worst hit market of the 20 metro areas covered was Miami, where the median home fell a whopping 15.1 percent in value. San Diego prices also fell steeply, down 13.4 percent. Las Vegas was off 13.2 percent and Detroit by 13 percent.

Three cities did emerge with higher prices compared with 12 months ago: Prices rose 2.9 percent in Charlotte, N.C., 1.8 percent in Seattle and 1.3 percent in Portland, Ore. But even these markets have turned down over the last three months. Indeed, every city in the index recorded at least three consecutive months of falling prices through November.

The three biggest U.S. cities also recorded year-over-year declines; New York was down 4.8 percent, Los Angeles 11.9 percent and Chicago 3.9 percent. The losses in Los Angeles accelerated in November; that city recorded the largest month-over-month drop of any index city, 3.6 percent.

Tuesday's report came in the wake of many other surveys indicating that the housing market is getting worse. Foreclosure filings and the risks of future foreclosures were both up sharply; the number of new homes sold plunged more steeply than any year on record; and the pace of existing home sales fell to their lowest level in 27 years. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Foreclosures up 75% in 2007

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The number of foreclosures soared in 2007, with 405,000 households losing their home, according to a report released Tuesday.

Total foreclosure filings soared 97% in December alone compared with December of 2006, according to RealtyTrac, an online seller of foreclosure properties. For the year, total filings - which include default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions - grew 75%.

More than 1 percent of all U.S. households were in some stage of foreclosure during 2007, up from 0.58 percent the year before.

"There are parts of the country where we're seeing many more bank repossessions," said Rick Sharga, a spokesman for RealtyTrac. "People are flat out losing their homes."

In California alone, nearly 66,000 people lost their homes last year. In Michigan, 47,000 families went through foreclosure. Also hard hit was Nevada, where 10,0000 people had their homes repossessed, a per-capita rate more than twice as high as California.

California had a total of 250,000 foreclosure filings, the highest number of of any state. Florida was second with more than 165,000 total filings.

Other hard-hit states include Michigan, which has been battered by job losses in the auto industry and had over 87,000 filings, Ohio, with more than 89,000 filings, and Colorado, with 39,000.

Nevada had 3.376 filings for every 100 households - a foreclosure rate of more than three times the national average, and the highest of any state.


According to Gail Burks, the CEO of the Nevada Fair Housing Center, a community advocacy group that aids home owners facing foreclosure, some communities in Las Vegas, Nevada's biggest city, have as many as 40 percent of homes in foreclosure.

"It's having a huge impact," she said. "Some zip codes here are recording 22 foreclosures a month."

The rise nationally has confounded some community advocates. "Last December, we thought the national numbers were bad, and now they're up almost 100 percent," said John Taylor, CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. "It just shows we need a comprehensive approach to solve the problem."

The increase in foreclosures has come about despite very low interest rates, as well as government, private enterprise and community advocate efforts to forestall the worst of the problems.

That's because sales are very slow in many housing markets and prices are down, leaving many troubled borrowers unable to sell in order to repay their mortgage debts.

Still, some states have avoided problems. Maine had just 286 properties with foreclosure filings on their records, Vermont had 29 and South Dakota just 24. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Foreclosures continue to soar - Jan. 29, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The number of foreclosures soared in 2007, with 405,000 households losing their home, according to a report released Tuesday.

Total foreclosure filings soared 97% in December alone compared with December of 2006, according to RealtyTrac, an online seller of foreclosure properties. For the year, total filings - which include default notices, auction sale notices and bank repossessions - grew 75%.

More than 1 percent of all U.S. households were in some stage of foreclosure during 2007, up from 0.58 percent the year before.

"There are parts of the country where we're seeing many more bank repossessions," said Rick Sharga, a spokesman for RealtyTrac. "People are flat out losing their homes."

In California alone, nearly 66,000 people lost their homes last year. In Michigan, 47,000 families went through foreclosure. Also hard hit was Nevada, where 10,0000 people had their homes repossessed, a per-capita rate more than twice as high as California.

California had a total of 250,000 foreclosure filings, the highest number of of any state. Florida was second with more than 165,000 total filings.

Other hard-hit states include Michigan, which has been battered by job losses in the auto industry and had over 87,000 filings, Ohio, with more than 89,000 filings, and Colorado, with 39,000.

Nevada had 3.376 filings for every 100 households - a foreclosure rate of more than three times the national average, and the highest of any state.


According to Gail Burks, the CEO of the Nevada Fair Housing Center, a community advocacy group that aids home owners facing foreclosure, some communities in Las Vegas, Nevada's biggest city, have as many as 40 percent of homes in foreclosure.

"It's having a huge impact," she said. "Some zip codes here are recording 22 foreclosures a month."

The rise nationally has confounded some community advocates. "Last December, we thought the national numbers were bad, and now they're up almost 100 percent," said John Taylor, CEO of the National Community Reinvestment Coalition. "It just shows we need a comprehensive approach to solve the problem."

The increase in foreclosures has come about despite very low interest rates, as well as government, private enterprise and community advocate efforts to forestall the worst of the problems.

That's because sales are very slow in many housing markets and prices are down, leaving many troubled borrowers unable to sell in order to repay their mortgage debts.

Still, some states have avoided problems. Maine had just 286 properties with foreclosure filings on their records, Vermont had 29 and South Dakota just 24. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Foreclosures spike - and will get much worse

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The risk of foreclosure is on a rapid rise nationally and, with a possible recession at hand, this spike in mortgage-defaults could last for years.

A report released Monday by First American Core Logic rates foreclosure risk for 381 metropolitan areas, and found that the risk of foreclosure has jumped 22 percent from January, 2007, and 9 percent from three months ago.

The risk scores are calculated based on economic factors such as job growth or loss, as well as incidences of fraud and other collateral risks. Home price trends are specially important.

"Before, it was all about the economy. Now, price drops are overcoming economic conditions [in driving up foreclosures]," said Marl Fleming, Core Logic's chief economist.

The Core Logic report speculated that foreclosure risks may get a lot worse, and stay that way for a long time.

In the wake of recent speculation that the United States economy may be entering a recession -- or is already in one - the report stressed that defaults continued rising for almost 2 years after the end of the last recession in 2001.

Based on that history, Core Logic expects that foreclosure risk will continue to increase over the next 18 months, at least.

Key to that finding is the added risk caused by the recent up-tick in job losses. Low unemployment had been a big factor in keeping foreclosure risk in check the past few years, according to Fleming.

The price declines are biting hardest in California, especially the Central Valley cities that had recorded outsized price gains during the boom. Of the top 10 large cities facing the highest risk of foreclosure over the next six months, five are in California. Of the 36 markets nationwide undergoing double-digit price declines, 22 are in California.

Bakersfield, Calif., was rated the highest risk market among the 100 largest metro areas. Home prices there are in steep decline, falling 16.9 percent during the past year, according to First American Loan Performance. Fleming pointed out that Bakersfield is a good example of a trend that is playing out in many markets.

Bakersfield acts like a satellite city for Los Angeles, where population density makes further housing development expensive. Supply of developable land in Los Angeles is scarce, which props up prices there, even in down years.

During the boom, home buyers priced out of L.A. purchased in far-flung markets like Bakersfield, where plentiful agricultural land was cheaply converted to housing. Many of the new residents continued to work in the Los Angeles area, a long but doable commute.

When demand slackened and prices slumped in Los Angeles, more people could afford to buy closer to the city, and demand dropped disproportionately in Bakersfield as well as in other nearby cities like Riverside and San Bernardino, sending prices plunging.

"Volatility in these places is high, especially on the down side," said Fleming.

And that goes a long way in explaining why foreclosure prospects are on the rise in Bakersfield, Stockton, Calif. (number 2 on the Core Logic list), Fresno, Calif. (number 3) and Riverside-San Bernardino (number 6).

The National Realtors Association reported last week that 2007 recorded the steepest drop in existing single-family home sales in 27 years. It was the first year on record that existing home prices posted declines. And the Census Bureau also reported recently that housing starts posted their biggest drop in 27 years.

After price drops, many mortgage borrowers find themselves underwater, owing more on their mortgages than their homes are worth. That makes it difficult for them to maintain their house payments if they run into any problems; they have one less asset (their home) to borrow against

The other main factor causing the heightened foreclosure risk is systemic economic problems. Cities such as Detroit (number 8 on the top 10 list), Warren, Mich. (number 4) and Youngstown, Ohio (number 10) are dependent on the auto and other heavy industry for jobs, and these industries have been laying off workers.

Midwestern markets ranked even higher up on the list in the recent past. Their present rankings don't represent any improvement on their part, but instead the rapid deterioration in the Sun Belt.  See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Foreign investors favor New York real estate

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Big Apple and the nation's capital edged out other world cities as the top spots for foreign commercial real estate dollars, according to a trade group survey released Monday.

The Association of Foreign Investors in Real Estate said foreign investors named New York as the No. 1 city for commercial real estate investment, up from No. 2 the prior year. Washington, D.C., and London tied for second, while Paris followed at fourth and Shanghai at fifth.

The results marked the first time U.S. cities have taken the top two spots since the category was added to the annual survey.

The survey also showed that foreign investors overwhelmingly believe the U.S. offers the most stable and secure real estate investments despite recent credit market disruptions and a slowing economy.

The U.S. market also offers the best opportunity for capital appreciation, investors said, followed by China, India, Russia and Mexico.

On average, investors said U.S. assets will make up more than 50 percent of their real estate acquisitions this year, roughly the same as last year. The weak dollar has not yet prompted any increase in U.S. allocation, 85 percent of respondents said.

U.S. retail ranked as the most preferred property type among foreign investors. Hotels came in second, followed by industrial, multifamily and office.

The survey was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2007 among the group's 200 members. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Foreign investors favor New York real estate - Jan. 28, 2008

WASHINGTON (AP) -- The Big Apple and the nation's capital edged out other world cities as the top spots for foreign commercial real estate dollars, according to a trade group survey released Monday.

The Association of Foreign Investors in Real Estate said foreign investors named New York as the No. 1 city for commercial real estate investment, up from No. 2 the prior year. Washington, D.C., and London tied for second, while Paris followed at fourth and Shanghai at fifth.

The results marked the first time U.S. cities have taken the top two spots since the category was added to the annual survey.

The survey also showed that foreign investors overwhelmingly believe the U.S. offers the most stable and secure real estate investments despite recent credit market disruptions and a slowing economy.

The U.S. market also offers the best opportunity for capital appreciation, investors said, followed by China, India, Russia and Mexico.

On average, investors said U.S. assets will make up more than 50 percent of their real estate acquisitions this year, roughly the same as last year. The weak dollar has not yet prompted any increase in U.S. allocation, 85 percent of respondents said.

U.S. retail ranked as the most preferred property type among foreign investors. Hotels came in second, followed by industrial, multifamily and office.

The survey was conducted in the fourth quarter of 2007 among the group's 200 members. See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Friday, January 25, 2008

Regulator opposes stimulus plan's mortgage fix

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A government agency with regulatory power over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae opposes lifting the loan caps for the two agencies, part of the economic stimulus package announced Thursday.

The stimulus package includes a proposal that temporarily raises loan limits for the government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That could kick start sluggish residential real estate markets in high cost areas that have suffered through the liquidity squeeze that started last summer.

The director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), James Lockhart, came out in opposition to the measure, releasing a statement on Thursday saying, "We are very disappointed in the proposal to increase the conforming loan limit as we believe it is a mistake to do so in the absence of comprehensive GSE regulatory reform."

The agency is likely concerned that if Fannie and Freddie take on even more debt, their financial health of could be imperiled.

"No one should be shocked by OFHEO's opposition," said Jaret Seiberg, an analyst at the policy research firm Stanford Group. "Director Lockhart has been extremely consistent in his demand that any change in conforming-loan limits be paired with legislation creating a stronger regulator."

According to Seiberg, Lockhart believes OFHEO lacks sufficient power to police the two GSEs. He believes that Lockhart wants to see many of the provisions included in the GSE reform bill, which would give OFHEO more authority over the GSEs, enabling it to establish stricter standards for lending and capital management. The bill has been languishing in Congress for about a year.

On Friday, Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., who chairs the Senate Banking Committee, pledged a renewed effort to get that bill through the Senate. That should be easier now that he's off the presidential campaign trail. One industry insider, speaking on background, said that when Dodd was running for president, nothing moved out of committee

The GSEs were created to ensure liquidity in mortgage markets. Lifting the caps on the size of mortgages that the GSEs purchase in secondary markets would advance that mission, and enable more buyers to procure financing.

But, increasing the dollar value of loans the GSEs are permitted to buy -- possibly to as much as $729,000 in some high cost areas, up from a maximum of $417,000 -- also increases the risk the agencies take on.

Many of these new, larger loans would be issued in expensive California markets where home prices have been in free fall. Plunging home values add to default rates by robbing home owners of equity they can tap when they hit a rough patch.

If a substantial proportion of the new, high-value loans default, the GSEs could take huge hits, on top of already substantial losses over the past few years.

That's where OFHEO's opposition stems from; it's main goal in advocating GSE reform, according to a speech Lockhart made this past December, is to promote safety and soundness in the enterprises.

Already, the GSEs have shown themselves to be vulnerable. Just six weeks ago, Freddie CEO Richard Syron forecast losses of at least $5.5 billion over the next couple of years from bad loans -- but they have already amassed huge obligations.

According to OFHEO, Fannie and Freddie together have debt of more than $1.5 trillion, and have guaranteed mortgage backed securities of more than $3.3 trillion, a total debt of nearly $4.9 trillion.

And this debt isn't backed by a lot of cash. Both Fannie and Freddie have minimum capital requirements of just 3.25 percent of assets - considerably lower than the 4 percent required for private lenders - making the agencies, at least potentially, very vulnerable.

"OFHEO," said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, "wants to make sure the GSEs are following sound procedures and have sufficient capital."

And, according to Zandi, OFHEO's position has long been backed by the administration - until recently. But the mortgage meltdown, the stock market slump, job weakness and a looming recession, have overrun that position. Easier mortgage financing became part of the stimulus package; at least for now.

"What's particularly interesting," said Seiberg, "is that the word is that we could have opposition from Senate Republicans to including the GSE provisions in the stimulus package."

According to him, a spokesman for Senator Richard Shelby (Ala.) has already come out against it, as has Senator Mel Martinez (Fla.).

"There's a lot of clear momentum to get the package done," said Seiberg, "but it's not a slam dunk getting the GSE provisions included."  See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Regulator opposes stimulus plan's mortgage fix - Jan. 26, 2008

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- A government agency with regulatory power over Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae opposes lifting the loan caps for the two agencies, part of the economic stimulus package announced Thursday.

The stimulus package includes a proposal that temporarily raises loan limits for the government sponsored enterprises (GSEs), Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. That could kick start sluggish residential real estate markets in high cost areas that have suffered through the liquidity squeeze that started last summer.

The director of the Office of Federal Housing Enterprise Oversight (OFHEO), James Lockhart, came out in opposition to the measure, releasing a statement on Thursday saying, "We are very disappointed in the proposal to increase the conforming loan limit as we believe it is a mistake to do so in the absence of comprehensive GSE regulatory reform."

The agency is likely concerned that if Fannie and Freddie take on even more debt, their financial health of could be imperiled.

"No one should be shocked by OFHEO's opposition," said Jaret Seiberg, an analyst at the policy research firm Stanford Group. "Director Lockhart has been extremely consistent in his demand that any change in conforming-loan limits be paired with legislation creating a stronger regulator."

According to Seiberg, Lockhart believes OFHEO lacks sufficient power to police the two GSEs. He believes that Lockhart wants to see many of the provisions included in the GSE reform bill, which would give OFHEO more authority over the GSEs, enabling it to establish stricter standards for lending and capital management. The bill has been languishing in Congress for about a year.

On Friday, Senator Chris Dodd, D-Conn., who chairs the Senate Banking Committee, pledged a renewed effort to get that bill through the Senate. That should be easier now that he's off the presidential campaign trail. One industry insider, speaking on background, said that when Dodd was running for president, nothing moved out of committee

The GSEs were created to ensure liquidity in mortgage markets. Lifting the caps on the size of mortgages that the GSEs purchase in secondary markets would advance that mission, and enable more buyers to procure financing.

But, increasing the dollar value of loans the GSEs are permitted to buy -- possibly to as much as $729,000 in some high cost areas, up from a maximum of $417,000 -- also increases the risk the agencies take on.

Many of these new, larger loans would be issued in expensive California markets where home prices have been in free fall. Plunging home values add to default rates by robbing home owners of equity they can tap when they hit a rough patch.

If a substantial proportion of the new, high-value loans default, the GSEs could take huge hits, on top of already substantial losses over the past few years.

That's where OFHEO's opposition stems from; it's main goal in advocating GSE reform, according to a speech Lockhart made this past December, is to promote safety and soundness in the enterprises.

Already, the GSEs have shown themselves to be vulnerable. Just six weeks ago, Freddie CEO Richard Syron forecast losses of at least $5.5 billion over the next couple of years from bad loans -- but they have already amassed huge obligations.

According to OFHEO, Fannie and Freddie together have debt of more than $1.5 trillion, and have guaranteed mortgage backed securities of more than $3.3 trillion, a total debt of nearly $4.9 trillion.

And this debt isn't backed by a lot of cash. Both Fannie and Freddie have minimum capital requirements of just 3.25 percent of assets - considerably lower than the 4 percent required for private lenders - making the agencies, at least potentially, very vulnerable.

"OFHEO," said Mark Zandi, chief economist for Moody's Economy.com, "wants to make sure the GSEs are following sound procedures and have sufficient capital."

And, according to Zandi, OFHEO's position has long been backed by the administration - until recently. But the mortgage meltdown, the stock market slump, job weakness and a looming recession, have overrun that position. Easier mortgage financing became part of the stimulus package; at least for now.

"What's particularly interesting," said Seiberg, "is that the word is that we could have opposition from Senate Republicans to including the GSE provisions in the stimulus package."

According to him, a spokesman for Senator Richard Shelby (Ala.) has already come out against it, as has Senator Mel Martinez (Fla.).

"There's a lot of clear momentum to get the package done," said Seiberg, "but it's not a slam dunk getting the GSE provisions included."  See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News

Thursday, January 24, 2008

Stimulus plan also sparks housing market

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- The economic stimulus plan announced Thursday by Congress and the Bush administration includes provisions that specifically address the mortgage crisis. It aims to make getting a mortgage easier and cheaper in high-cost markets, to facilitate refinancing and to prevent foreclosures.

The package proposes lifting the dollar amount of loans that are eligible for purchase by Freddie Mac (FRE, Fortune 500) and Fannie Mae (FNM).

These government sponsored enterprises currently guarantee a secondary market for loans of less than $417,000, which makes lenders more willing to issue them. The stimulus package proposes raising that cap to $625,000 for twelve months in order to make it easier for buyers to get or refinance mortgages - especially in high-cost regions like California.

"It's about time," said Richard DeKaser, chief economist for banking giant National City Corp. "The idea has rattled around Congress for a year. Most analysts agree the market for "jumbo" loans [which exceed the cap limits] has been hurt by lender flight."

The increased cap should give a boost to some of the most sluggish markets in the nation, like Florida, where high home prices typically mean that mortgages exceed the $417,000 loan limits. When credit markets contracted last summer, jumbo loans over that amount became much harder to get and, as a result, home sales in pricey markets took a hit.

"This will have a big, immediate impact, especially in California where sales have been down most significantly," said Lawrence Yun, chief economist for the National Association of Realtors.

Homeowners with jumbo mortgages also pay higher interest rates because, with no guaranteed secondary market for the loans, lenders take on more risk, and charge borrowers more for doing so.

For instance, the interest rate difference between loans that fall within the cap limit and jumbo loans was more than 1 percent on Thursday -- 6.39 percent compared with 5.30 percent, according to Bankrate.com. On a $500,000 mortgage, the difference is about $350 a month.

Pain relief for mortgage fare-ups

"The 1 percent drop is a huge factor," said Yun. "In California, it could create a mini-boom."

Before the stimulus package was announced, analysts including Merrill Lynch had come out with dire forecasts for housing markets over the next couple of years.

But, said Mike Larson, a real estate analyst with Weiss Research. "[the raise in loan limits] could remove some of the inventory overhang and alter the buyer psychology a bit. Right now they're still waiting for prices to fall."

Yun added, "There's a lot of pent-up demand in the market. This will boost confidence among these potential buyers, and some of the people on the fence will start buying."

The National Association of Realtors recently projected that a higher loan limit, which the organization and other industry trade groups have been lobbying for, would boost home sales by nearly 350,000 a year.

It would also reduce the average period of time a home sits on the market by a month and a half, and lift prices by two or three percentage points.

Home price increases could help keep foreclosures in check by increasing a distressed owner's home equity, making it easier for them to refinance.  See Also

Source: Home Mortgage Rates and Real Estate News